{"title":"关于精神科医生使用精神损伤评定量表进行评定的报告：澳大利亚的一些数据","authors":"James Athanasou","doi":"10.32388/wcwn91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The _Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale _has been used in Australia for over 20 years to determine a compensable proportion for patients with a personal injury. This study examined the records of the ratings of 30 psychiatrists on the scale. Psychological injury versus other injury was distinguished by the_ PIRS_. Correlations between the aggregate score, the median class and the overall percentage impairment rating were all high (.819 to.960). The distribution of ratings on each of the six sub-functions varied markedly. There was a preponderance of category 3 ratings and the distribution of overall percentage impairment was skewed negatively. The coefficient alpha based on the aggregate score was.731. Independent ratings (N=15) of the same patients, however, showed substantial concurrent stability of judgements.\n","PeriodicalId":503632,"journal":{"name":"Qeios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Report on the Ratings of Psychiatrists Using the Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale: Some Australian Data\",\"authors\":\"James Athanasou\",\"doi\":\"10.32388/wcwn91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The _Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale _has been used in Australia for over 20 years to determine a compensable proportion for patients with a personal injury. This study examined the records of the ratings of 30 psychiatrists on the scale. Psychological injury versus other injury was distinguished by the_ PIRS_. Correlations between the aggregate score, the median class and the overall percentage impairment rating were all high (.819 to.960). The distribution of ratings on each of the six sub-functions varied markedly. There was a preponderance of category 3 ratings and the distribution of overall percentage impairment was skewed negatively. The coefficient alpha based on the aggregate score was.731. Independent ratings (N=15) of the same patients, however, showed substantial concurrent stability of judgements.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qeios\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qeios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32388/wcwn91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qeios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32388/wcwn91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Report on the Ratings of Psychiatrists Using the Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale: Some Australian Data
The _Psychiatric Impairment Rating Scale _has been used in Australia for over 20 years to determine a compensable proportion for patients with a personal injury. This study examined the records of the ratings of 30 psychiatrists on the scale. Psychological injury versus other injury was distinguished by the_ PIRS_. Correlations between the aggregate score, the median class and the overall percentage impairment rating were all high (.819 to.960). The distribution of ratings on each of the six sub-functions varied markedly. There was a preponderance of category 3 ratings and the distribution of overall percentage impairment was skewed negatively. The coefficient alpha based on the aggregate score was.731. Independent ratings (N=15) of the same patients, however, showed substantial concurrent stability of judgements.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
