在资源有限的医疗机构中,白蛋白治疗失代偿期肝硬化的成本效益

Irsan Hasan, Ignatia Sinta Murti, P. Bayupurnama, K. Kalista, Christina Hill-Zabala, Dennis Kananda, Elisabet Viayna
{"title":"在资源有限的医疗机构中,白蛋白治疗失代偿期肝硬化的成本效益","authors":"Irsan Hasan, Ignatia Sinta Murti, P. Bayupurnama, K. Kalista, Christina Hill-Zabala, Dennis Kananda, Elisabet Viayna","doi":"10.7573/dic.2024-1-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Human albumin (HA) is an effective adjuvant treatment for patients with cirrhosis developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and ascites requiring large-volume paracentesis (LVP). However, cost remains a barrier to use, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of HA in patients with cirrhosis with SBP, HRS or ascites requiring LVP in the Indonesian healthcare system as a representative of a resource-limited setting. Methods: Three decision-tree models were developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) antibiotics and HA versus antibiotics alone in patients with SBP, (2) terlipressin and HA versus terlipressin alone in patients with HRS, and (3) LVP and HA versus LVP and gelatine for patients with ascites. Clinical utility and economic inputs were pooled from the available literature. Time horizon was 3 months. Outcomes were expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) reported as 2021 IDR per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (exchange rate June 30, 2021: 1 EUR = 17,245 IDR). Willingness-to-pay thresholds considered were: three times the GDP per capita (199,355,561 IDR/QALY; 11,560 EUR/QALY) and one time the GDP per capita (66,451,854 IDR/QALY; 3853 EUR/QALY). Results: The ICER for antibiotics and HA ( versus antibiotics alone) for SBP was 80,562,652 IDR per QALY gained (4672 EUR/QALY). The ICER for terlipressin and HA ( versus terli-pressin) for HRS was 23,085,004 IDR per QALY gained (1339 EUR/QALY). The ICER for LVP and HA versus LVP and gela-tine was 24,569,827 IDR per QALY gained (1425 EUR/QALY). Conclusion: Adjunctive HA may be a cost-effective treat-ment for SBP, HRS and LVP in resource-limited settings.","PeriodicalId":502654,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"69 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in resource-limited healthcare settings\",\"authors\":\"Irsan Hasan, Ignatia Sinta Murti, P. Bayupurnama, K. Kalista, Christina Hill-Zabala, Dennis Kananda, Elisabet Viayna\",\"doi\":\"10.7573/dic.2024-1-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Human albumin (HA) is an effective adjuvant treatment for patients with cirrhosis developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and ascites requiring large-volume paracentesis (LVP). However, cost remains a barrier to use, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of HA in patients with cirrhosis with SBP, HRS or ascites requiring LVP in the Indonesian healthcare system as a representative of a resource-limited setting. Methods: Three decision-tree models were developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) antibiotics and HA versus antibiotics alone in patients with SBP, (2) terlipressin and HA versus terlipressin alone in patients with HRS, and (3) LVP and HA versus LVP and gelatine for patients with ascites. Clinical utility and economic inputs were pooled from the available literature. Time horizon was 3 months. Outcomes were expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) reported as 2021 IDR per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (exchange rate June 30, 2021: 1 EUR = 17,245 IDR). Willingness-to-pay thresholds considered were: three times the GDP per capita (199,355,561 IDR/QALY; 11,560 EUR/QALY) and one time the GDP per capita (66,451,854 IDR/QALY; 3853 EUR/QALY). Results: The ICER for antibiotics and HA ( versus antibiotics alone) for SBP was 80,562,652 IDR per QALY gained (4672 EUR/QALY). The ICER for terlipressin and HA ( versus terli-pressin) for HRS was 23,085,004 IDR per QALY gained (1339 EUR/QALY). The ICER for LVP and HA versus LVP and gela-tine was 24,569,827 IDR per QALY gained (1425 EUR/QALY). Conclusion: Adjunctive HA may be a cost-effective treat-ment for SBP, HRS and LVP in resource-limited settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"volume\":\"69 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Context\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2024-1-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2024-1-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人血白蛋白(HA对于发生自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)、肝肾综合征(HRS)和需要大容量腹腔穿刺术(LVP)的腹水的肝硬化患者来说,人血白蛋白(HA)是一种有效的辅助治疗方法。然而,成本仍然是使用的障碍,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。本研究旨在评估在资源有限的环境下,在印尼医疗系统中对患有 SBP、HRS 或需要大容量腹腔穿刺术的腹水的肝硬化患者使用 HA 的成本效益。方法:建立了三个决策树模型,以评估 (1) SBP 患者使用抗生素和 HA 与仅使用抗生素的成本效益;(2) HRS 患者使用特利加压素和 HA 与仅使用特利加压素的成本效益;(3) 腹水患者使用 LVP 和 HA 与 LVP 和明胶的成本效益。临床效用和经济投入均来自现有文献。时间跨度为 3 个月。结果以每质量调整生命年(QALY)2021 IDR(2021 年 6 月 30 日汇率:1 欧元 = 17,245 IDR)的增量成本效益比(ICER)表示。考虑的支付意愿阈值为:人均 GDP 的三倍(199,355,561 IDR/QALY;11,560 欧元/QALY)和人均 GDP 的一倍(66,451,854 IDR/QALY;3853 欧元/QALY)。结果:抗生素和 HA(与单独使用抗生素相比)治疗 SBP 的 ICER 为 80,562,652 IDR/QALY(4672 欧元/QALY)。特利加压素和 HA(与特利加压素相比)治疗 HRS 的 ICER 为每 QALY 收益 23,085,004 IDR(1339 欧元/QALY)。LVP和HA与LVP和格拉替尼相比,每QALY收益的ICER为24,569,827IDR(1425欧元/QALY)。结论:在资源有限的情况下,辅助 HA 治疗 SBP、HRS 和 LVP 可能具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in resource-limited healthcare settings
Background: Human albumin (HA) is an effective adjuvant treatment for patients with cirrhosis developing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and ascites requiring large-volume paracentesis (LVP). However, cost remains a barrier to use, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of HA in patients with cirrhosis with SBP, HRS or ascites requiring LVP in the Indonesian healthcare system as a representative of a resource-limited setting. Methods: Three decision-tree models were developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) antibiotics and HA versus antibiotics alone in patients with SBP, (2) terlipressin and HA versus terlipressin alone in patients with HRS, and (3) LVP and HA versus LVP and gelatine for patients with ascites. Clinical utility and economic inputs were pooled from the available literature. Time horizon was 3 months. Outcomes were expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) reported as 2021 IDR per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (exchange rate June 30, 2021: 1 EUR = 17,245 IDR). Willingness-to-pay thresholds considered were: three times the GDP per capita (199,355,561 IDR/QALY; 11,560 EUR/QALY) and one time the GDP per capita (66,451,854 IDR/QALY; 3853 EUR/QALY). Results: The ICER for antibiotics and HA ( versus antibiotics alone) for SBP was 80,562,652 IDR per QALY gained (4672 EUR/QALY). The ICER for terlipressin and HA ( versus terli-pressin) for HRS was 23,085,004 IDR per QALY gained (1339 EUR/QALY). The ICER for LVP and HA versus LVP and gela-tine was 24,569,827 IDR per QALY gained (1425 EUR/QALY). Conclusion: Adjunctive HA may be a cost-effective treat-ment for SBP, HRS and LVP in resource-limited settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信