作为记忆基础结构的法律:罗马尼亚的档案法律话语与记忆之争

Mihaela Şerban
{"title":"作为记忆基础结构的法律:罗马尼亚的档案法律话语与记忆之争","authors":"Mihaela Şerban","doi":"10.1177/17438721241245616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines law as mnemonic infrastructure, tracing how archival laws and policies in Romania shape the construction of its collective memory of communism and fascism. The four layers analyzed here—archival institutions, norms, processes, and practices—help produce a memory regime characterized by nationalism, the securitization of historical memory, and a selectively amnesic collective memory. Focusing on law as mnemonic infrastructure highlights indirect and structural pathways in the construction of memory regimes, with distinctive, if not always obvious, knowledge and truth effects that help clarify the role of law in promoting or undermining hegemonic memory regimes.","PeriodicalId":514759,"journal":{"name":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","volume":"80 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law as Mnemonic Infrastructure: Archival Legal Discourses and Memory Battles in Romania\",\"authors\":\"Mihaela Şerban\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17438721241245616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines law as mnemonic infrastructure, tracing how archival laws and policies in Romania shape the construction of its collective memory of communism and fascism. The four layers analyzed here—archival institutions, norms, processes, and practices—help produce a memory regime characterized by nationalism, the securitization of historical memory, and a selectively amnesic collective memory. Focusing on law as mnemonic infrastructure highlights indirect and structural pathways in the construction of memory regimes, with distinctive, if not always obvious, knowledge and truth effects that help clarify the role of law in promoting or undermining hegemonic memory regimes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Culture and the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"80 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Culture and the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721241245616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721241245616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了作为记忆基础设施的法律,追溯了罗马尼亚的档案法律和政策是如何塑造其对共产主义和法西斯主义的集体记忆的。本文分析的四个层面--档案机构、规范、流程和实践--有助于形成以民族主义、历史记忆安全化和选择性遗忘的集体记忆为特征的记忆机制。将重点放在作为记忆基础结构的法律上,可以突出记忆制度构建过程中的间接和结构性途径,这些途径具有独特的知识和真理效应,尽管这些效应并不总是显而易见的,但却有助于阐明法律在促进或破坏霸权记忆制度中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law as Mnemonic Infrastructure: Archival Legal Discourses and Memory Battles in Romania
This article examines law as mnemonic infrastructure, tracing how archival laws and policies in Romania shape the construction of its collective memory of communism and fascism. The four layers analyzed here—archival institutions, norms, processes, and practices—help produce a memory regime characterized by nationalism, the securitization of historical memory, and a selectively amnesic collective memory. Focusing on law as mnemonic infrastructure highlights indirect and structural pathways in the construction of memory regimes, with distinctive, if not always obvious, knowledge and truth effects that help clarify the role of law in promoting or undermining hegemonic memory regimes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信