治疗局部晚期喉癌和下咽癌的喉切除术加术后放射(系统)治疗与主要放射(系统)治疗的比较--雷根斯堡大学临床癌症登记处的结果。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Julia Maurer, Julian Kuenzel, Christopher Bohr, Oliver Koelbl, Karolina Mueller, Michael Koller, Oreste-Konrad Concato, Veronika Vielsmeier, Christoph Suess
{"title":"治疗局部晚期喉癌和下咽癌的喉切除术加术后放射(系统)治疗与主要放射(系统)治疗的比较--雷根斯堡大学临床癌症登记处的结果。","authors":"Julia Maurer, Julian Kuenzel, Christopher Bohr, Oliver Koelbl, Karolina Mueller, Michael Koller, Oreste-Konrad Concato, Veronika Vielsmeier, Christoph Suess","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2340086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere are few adequate randomized clinical trials directly comparing the therapeutic options of primary laryngectomy (pLE) vs. primary radio(system)therapy (pR(S)T) in patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma and thus little clear scientific evidence to decide which patients will benefit most from which procedure.\n\n\nAIMS/OBJECTIVES\nAim was to compare survival between the therapeutic options and to learn from the limitations of this study, especially in the context of improved clinical assessment.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nThe clinical data of patients treated between January 2010 and February 2022 were obtained from the electronic database of the University Hospital Regensburg. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the treatment groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe study included 193 patients (pLE n = 68, pR(S)T, n = 125). Median OS was 31.2 months and median PFS was 24.7 months with no significant difference between the treatment groups (p > .050). Patients who did not receive complete treatment as recommended by the tumor conference (n = 47, 24.4%) had a higher risk of death (p = .024).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE\nThe results of our study are consistent with the survival data reported in the literature. More detailed systematic data in clinical routine (e.g. relevant comorbidities) are required to ensure guideline-based recommended therapy.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laryngectomy plus postoperative radio(system)therapy versus primary radio(system) therapy for the treatment of locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer - results from the University Clinical Cancer Registry Regensburg.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Maurer, Julian Kuenzel, Christopher Bohr, Oliver Koelbl, Karolina Mueller, Michael Koller, Oreste-Konrad Concato, Veronika Vielsmeier, Christoph Suess\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2024.2340086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThere are few adequate randomized clinical trials directly comparing the therapeutic options of primary laryngectomy (pLE) vs. primary radio(system)therapy (pR(S)T) in patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma and thus little clear scientific evidence to decide which patients will benefit most from which procedure.\\n\\n\\nAIMS/OBJECTIVES\\nAim was to compare survival between the therapeutic options and to learn from the limitations of this study, especially in the context of improved clinical assessment.\\n\\n\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\nThe clinical data of patients treated between January 2010 and February 2022 were obtained from the electronic database of the University Hospital Regensburg. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the treatment groups.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe study included 193 patients (pLE n = 68, pR(S)T, n = 125). Median OS was 31.2 months and median PFS was 24.7 months with no significant difference between the treatment groups (p > .050). Patients who did not receive complete treatment as recommended by the tumor conference (n = 47, 24.4%) had a higher risk of death (p = .024).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE\\nThe results of our study are consistent with the survival data reported in the literature. More detailed systematic data in clinical routine (e.g. relevant comorbidities) are required to ensure guideline-based recommended therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2340086\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2340086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景在局部晚期喉癌和下咽癌患者中,很少有充分的随机临床试验直接比较原发性喉切除术(pLE)与原发性放射(系统)治疗(pR(S)T)的治疗方案,因此很少有明确的科学证据来决定哪种手术对患者的益处最大。材料与方法从雷根斯堡大学医院的电子数据库中获取了2010年1月至2022年2月期间接受治疗的患者的临床数据。结果研究共纳入 193 例患者(pLE 68 例,pR(S)T 125 例)。中位 OS 为 31.2 个月,中位 PFS 为 24.7 个月,治疗组间无显著差异(P > 0.050)。未按照肿瘤会议建议接受完整治疗的患者(n = 47,24.4%)死亡风险较高(p = .024)。结论和意义我们的研究结果与文献报道的生存数据一致。临床常规中需要更详细的系统数据(如相关合并症),以确保基于指南推荐的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laryngectomy plus postoperative radio(system)therapy versus primary radio(system) therapy for the treatment of locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer - results from the University Clinical Cancer Registry Regensburg.
BACKGROUND There are few adequate randomized clinical trials directly comparing the therapeutic options of primary laryngectomy (pLE) vs. primary radio(system)therapy (pR(S)T) in patients with locally advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma and thus little clear scientific evidence to decide which patients will benefit most from which procedure. AIMS/OBJECTIVES Aim was to compare survival between the therapeutic options and to learn from the limitations of this study, especially in the context of improved clinical assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS The clinical data of patients treated between January 2010 and February 2022 were obtained from the electronic database of the University Hospital Regensburg. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the treatment groups. RESULTS The study included 193 patients (pLE n = 68, pR(S)T, n = 125). Median OS was 31.2 months and median PFS was 24.7 months with no significant difference between the treatment groups (p > .050). Patients who did not receive complete treatment as recommended by the tumor conference (n = 47, 24.4%) had a higher risk of death (p = .024). CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE The results of our study are consistent with the survival data reported in the literature. More detailed systematic data in clinical routine (e.g. relevant comorbidities) are required to ensure guideline-based recommended therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信