评估佛罗里达州东南部城市废水处理方案的相对风险。

F. Bloetscher, D. Meeroff, Kelley Conboy, C. Sham, R. Fergen, Richard Gallant, James Hart, T. Shibata, M. E. Tuccillo, J. Englehardt
{"title":"评估佛罗里达州东南部城市废水处理方案的相对风险。","authors":"F. Bloetscher, D. Meeroff, Kelley Conboy, C. Sham, R. Fergen, Richard Gallant, James Hart, T. Shibata, M. E. Tuccillo, J. Englehardt","doi":"10.1111/risa.14301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative assessment of the risks of the three current wastewater effluent disposal options and three other potential options was conducted for Southeast Florida communities. The question was how the risk to humans from the use of potable reuse compares to the other five available wastewater disposal alternatives. The need for this type of risk assessment is due to the potential to use potable reuse as a water supply and the potential resistance from the public as a result of such a proposal. Water quality data relevant to disposal of wastewater treatment plant effluent from South Florida utilities along with water quality data on the receiving waters and drinking water standards were obtained for the project. The comparison of the public health risks associated with these disposal alternatives indicated that health risks associated with deep wells and direct potable reuse were generally lower than those of the other alternatives.","PeriodicalId":517072,"journal":{"name":"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing relative risks of municipal wastewater disposal options for Southeast Florida.\",\"authors\":\"F. Bloetscher, D. Meeroff, Kelley Conboy, C. Sham, R. Fergen, Richard Gallant, James Hart, T. Shibata, M. E. Tuccillo, J. Englehardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/risa.14301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparative assessment of the risks of the three current wastewater effluent disposal options and three other potential options was conducted for Southeast Florida communities. The question was how the risk to humans from the use of potable reuse compares to the other five available wastewater disposal alternatives. The need for this type of risk assessment is due to the potential to use potable reuse as a water supply and the potential resistance from the public as a result of such a proposal. Water quality data relevant to disposal of wastewater treatment plant effluent from South Florida utilities along with water quality data on the receiving waters and drinking water standards were obtained for the project. The comparison of the public health risks associated with these disposal alternatives indicated that health risks associated with deep wells and direct potable reuse were generally lower than those of the other alternatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对佛罗里达州东南部社区,对三种现有废水处理方案和其他三种潜在方案的风险进行了比较评估。问题是,与其他五种可用的废水处理替代方案相比,使用饮用水回用对人类造成的风险如何。之所以需要进行此类风险评估,是因为有可能将饮用水回用作为一种供水方式,而且这种提议可能会遭到公众的抵制。该项目获得了南佛罗里达公用事业公司提供的与污水处理厂污水处理相关的水质数据,以及受纳水体的水质数据和饮用水标准。对与这些处置替代方案相关的公众健康风险进行的比较表明,与深井和直接饮用水回用相关的健康风险总体上低于其他替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing relative risks of municipal wastewater disposal options for Southeast Florida.
A comparative assessment of the risks of the three current wastewater effluent disposal options and three other potential options was conducted for Southeast Florida communities. The question was how the risk to humans from the use of potable reuse compares to the other five available wastewater disposal alternatives. The need for this type of risk assessment is due to the potential to use potable reuse as a water supply and the potential resistance from the public as a result of such a proposal. Water quality data relevant to disposal of wastewater treatment plant effluent from South Florida utilities along with water quality data on the receiving waters and drinking water standards were obtained for the project. The comparison of the public health risks associated with these disposal alternatives indicated that health risks associated with deep wells and direct potable reuse were generally lower than those of the other alternatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信