超声波评估深筋膜厚度:可靠性以及与临床评估变化之间的联系

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Shir Schadmy Levy, Kobi Weiss, Leonid Kalichman
{"title":"超声波评估深筋膜厚度:可靠性以及与临床评估变化之间的联系","authors":"Shir Schadmy Levy,&nbsp;Kobi Weiss,&nbsp;Leonid Kalichman","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is growing evidence of fascial involvement in musculoskeletal pathologies; thus, measuring the fascia's properties is clinically essential.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>1) to evaluate intra- and inter-tester reliability of sonographic measurements of deep fascia thickness in healthy individuals; 2) to assess whether fascial thickness in areas of fascial movement restriction (fascial densification in Stecco's Fascial Manipulation method), differs from contralateral areas with normal fascia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Part 1 (reliability study): Fascial thickness was sonographically measured in 10 sites (5 on each side), twice by a single examiner to assess intra-rater reliability and once by a second examiner to evaluate inter-rater reliability.</p><p>Part 2 (cross-sectional study): Unilateral fascial movement restrictions were detected in 5 bilateral sites by palpation. The fascial thickness on the ultrasound image was measured at the restriction site and its normal contralateral side by a blinded assessor.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>21 healthy individuals were evaluated in part 1, 15 healthy individuals in part 2. Intra-tester reliability (Interclass correlation – ICC) values ranged from 0.677 to 0.975; inter-tester ICC values ranged from 0.473 to 0.966. No significant differences in fascia thickness between the right and left body sides were observed in most sites. Significant differences were found between the fascial thickness of the site of fascial movement restrictions vs. normal counterpart.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intra- and inter-rater reliability of sonographic measuring fascial thickness was high, and fascial thickness of the site of fascial movement restrictions was greater than in the normal counterpart. Ultrasonography may be used as a reliable method to evaluate fascial alterations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound evaluation of deep fascia thickness: Reliability and association with clinically evaluated changes\",\"authors\":\"Shir Schadmy Levy,&nbsp;Kobi Weiss,&nbsp;Leonid Kalichman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is growing evidence of fascial involvement in musculoskeletal pathologies; thus, measuring the fascia's properties is clinically essential.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>1) to evaluate intra- and inter-tester reliability of sonographic measurements of deep fascia thickness in healthy individuals; 2) to assess whether fascial thickness in areas of fascial movement restriction (fascial densification in Stecco's Fascial Manipulation method), differs from contralateral areas with normal fascia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Part 1 (reliability study): Fascial thickness was sonographically measured in 10 sites (5 on each side), twice by a single examiner to assess intra-rater reliability and once by a second examiner to evaluate inter-rater reliability.</p><p>Part 2 (cross-sectional study): Unilateral fascial movement restrictions were detected in 5 bilateral sites by palpation. The fascial thickness on the ultrasound image was measured at the restriction site and its normal contralateral side by a blinded assessor.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>21 healthy individuals were evaluated in part 1, 15 healthy individuals in part 2. Intra-tester reliability (Interclass correlation – ICC) values ranged from 0.677 to 0.975; inter-tester ICC values ranged from 0.473 to 0.966. No significant differences in fascia thickness between the right and left body sides were observed in most sites. Significant differences were found between the fascial thickness of the site of fascial movement restrictions vs. normal counterpart.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Intra- and inter-rater reliability of sonographic measuring fascial thickness was high, and fascial thickness of the site of fascial movement restrictions was greater than in the normal counterpart. Ultrasonography may be used as a reliable method to evaluate fascial alterations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224001992\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224001992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景越来越多的证据表明,筋膜参与了肌肉骨骼病变;因此,测量筋膜的特性在临床上至关重要。目的1)评估健康人深筋膜厚度声像图测量的测试者内部和测试者之间的可靠性;2)评估筋膜活动受限区域(Stecco筋膜操作法中的筋膜致密化)的筋膜厚度是否与对侧正常筋膜区域不同:对 10 个部位(每侧 5 个)的筋膜厚度进行声学测量,由一名检查者测量两次以评估评分者内部的可靠性,由另一名检查者测量一次以评估评分者之间的可靠性:第 2 部分(横断面研究):通过触诊发现 5 个双侧部位存在单侧筋膜活动受限。结果 第 1 部分评估了 21 名健康人,第 2 部分评估了 15 名健康人。测试仪内部的可靠性(类间相关性 - ICC)值在 0.677 到 0.975 之间;测试仪之间的 ICC 值在 0.473 到 0.966 之间。在大多数部位,身体左右两侧的筋膜厚度没有明显差异。结论超声波测量筋膜厚度的内部和评分者之间的可靠性很高,筋膜活动受限部位的筋膜厚度大于正常部位。超声波检查可作为评估筋膜改变的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound evaluation of deep fascia thickness: Reliability and association with clinically evaluated changes

Background

There is growing evidence of fascial involvement in musculoskeletal pathologies; thus, measuring the fascia's properties is clinically essential.

Objectives

1) to evaluate intra- and inter-tester reliability of sonographic measurements of deep fascia thickness in healthy individuals; 2) to assess whether fascial thickness in areas of fascial movement restriction (fascial densification in Stecco's Fascial Manipulation method), differs from contralateral areas with normal fascia.

Methods

Part 1 (reliability study): Fascial thickness was sonographically measured in 10 sites (5 on each side), twice by a single examiner to assess intra-rater reliability and once by a second examiner to evaluate inter-rater reliability.

Part 2 (cross-sectional study): Unilateral fascial movement restrictions were detected in 5 bilateral sites by palpation. The fascial thickness on the ultrasound image was measured at the restriction site and its normal contralateral side by a blinded assessor.

Results

21 healthy individuals were evaluated in part 1, 15 healthy individuals in part 2. Intra-tester reliability (Interclass correlation – ICC) values ranged from 0.677 to 0.975; inter-tester ICC values ranged from 0.473 to 0.966. No significant differences in fascia thickness between the right and left body sides were observed in most sites. Significant differences were found between the fascial thickness of the site of fascial movement restrictions vs. normal counterpart.

Conclusions

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of sonographic measuring fascial thickness was high, and fascial thickness of the site of fascial movement restrictions was greater than in the normal counterpart. Ultrasonography may be used as a reliable method to evaluate fascial alterations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信