{"title":"不切实际的目标的价值:为何一些气候活动家不愿放弃 1.5 ℃ 目标","authors":"Jennifer Hadden, Aseem Prakash","doi":"10.1038/s44168-024-00118-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence is mounting that the 1.5 °C goal of the Paris Agreement is unrealistic. But, contrary to many in the scientific community, major NGOs have remained steadfast in their support for this target. We argue that this is because “unrealistic” or aspirational targets can serve important political objectives, including becoming focal points for coalition-building and broad-based mobilization and allowing for effective naming and shaming.","PeriodicalId":186004,"journal":{"name":"npj Climate Action","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00118-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of unrealistic targets: why some climate activists are unwilling to abandon the 1.5 °C target\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Hadden, Aseem Prakash\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44168-024-00118-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evidence is mounting that the 1.5 °C goal of the Paris Agreement is unrealistic. But, contrary to many in the scientific community, major NGOs have remained steadfast in their support for this target. We argue that this is because “unrealistic” or aspirational targets can serve important political objectives, including becoming focal points for coalition-building and broad-based mobilization and allowing for effective naming and shaming.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Climate Action\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00118-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Climate Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00118-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Climate Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44168-024-00118-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
越来越多的证据表明,《巴黎协定》中 1.5 °C 的目标是不现实的。但是,与科学界的许多人相反,主要的非政府组织仍然坚定地支持这一目标。我们认为,这是因为 "不现实 "或有抱负的目标可以达到重要的政治目的,包括成为建立联盟和广泛动员的焦点,并允许有效的点名和羞辱。
The value of unrealistic targets: why some climate activists are unwilling to abandon the 1.5 °C target
Evidence is mounting that the 1.5 °C goal of the Paris Agreement is unrealistic. But, contrary to many in the scientific community, major NGOs have remained steadfast in their support for this target. We argue that this is because “unrealistic” or aspirational targets can serve important political objectives, including becoming focal points for coalition-building and broad-based mobilization and allowing for effective naming and shaming.