回复《批评的火热考验》的批评者

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2024-04-19 DOI:10.1017/s1369415424000189

Ian Proops

引用次数: 0

摘要

我回答了贝亚特丽斯-朗格尼斯和帕特里夏-基切对我的著作《批判的火热考验》的批评：朗格尼斯（Béatrice Longuenesse）和帕特里夏-基彻（Patricia Kitcher）关于对立统一的批评，艾伦-伍德（Allen Wood）关于第三对立统一与自由的批评，德斯-霍根（Des Hogan）关于对立统一的解决的批评，以及安雅-尧尔尼格（Anja Jauernig）关于本体论论证的批评。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Replies to Critics of The Fiery Test of Critique

I reply to criticisms of my book The Fiery Test of Critique: A Reading of Kant’s Dialectic from Béatrice Longuenesse and Patricia Kitcher on the paralogisms, Allen Wood on the third antinomy and freedom, Des Hogan on the resolution of the antinomies, and Anja Jauernig on the ontological argument.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.