{"title":"SNAP 参与者和非参与者的家庭粮食安全对策","authors":"Parke E. Wilde, Irma Arteaga","doi":"10.1002/aepp.13435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigate the distinct associations between Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and different experiences of food-related hardship. Using a generalization of the Rasch model with USDA Economic Research Service 2022 data for 10 adult-referenced food security survey items, we find evidence of uniform differential item function. The gap in odds of response between the first item (food-related worry) and the third item (difficulty acquiring balanced meals) was larger for SNAP households than for non-SNAP households. Similar differences were observed for other survey items. We consider whether SNAP policy or program changes could increase beneficial impacts differentially for particular food-related hardships.</p>","PeriodicalId":8004,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","volume":"46 4","pages":"1338-1354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.13435","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household food security responses for SNAP participants and nonparticipants\",\"authors\":\"Parke E. Wilde, Irma Arteaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aepp.13435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We investigate the distinct associations between Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and different experiences of food-related hardship. Using a generalization of the Rasch model with USDA Economic Research Service 2022 data for 10 adult-referenced food security survey items, we find evidence of uniform differential item function. The gap in odds of response between the first item (food-related worry) and the third item (difficulty acquiring balanced meals) was larger for SNAP households than for non-SNAP households. Similar differences were observed for other survey items. We consider whether SNAP policy or program changes could increase beneficial impacts differentially for particular food-related hardships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"1338-1354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aepp.13435\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aepp.13435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aepp.13435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Household food security responses for SNAP participants and nonparticipants
We investigate the distinct associations between Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation and different experiences of food-related hardship. Using a generalization of the Rasch model with USDA Economic Research Service 2022 data for 10 adult-referenced food security survey items, we find evidence of uniform differential item function. The gap in odds of response between the first item (food-related worry) and the third item (difficulty acquiring balanced meals) was larger for SNAP households than for non-SNAP households. Similar differences were observed for other survey items. We consider whether SNAP policy or program changes could increase beneficial impacts differentially for particular food-related hardships.
期刊介绍：
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy provides a forum to address contemporary and emerging policy issues within an economic framework that informs the decision-making and policy-making community.
AEPP welcomes submissions related to the economics of public policy themes associated with agriculture; animal, plant, and human health; energy; environment; food and consumer behavior; international development; natural hazards; natural resources; population and migration; and regional and rural development.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
