非药物干预分组随机试验中的个人同意：超越渥太华声明

IF 3.1 3区医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Critical Public Health Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1080/09581596.2024.2338074

Marissa LeBlanc, Jon Williamson, Francesco De Pretis, Jürgen Landes, Elena Rocca

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了在分组随机试验（CRTs）中个人同意参与权的优先权问题。我们重点讨论了测试非药物干预疗效的分组随机试验（CRTs）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Individual consent in cluster randomised trials for non-pharmaceutical interventions: going beyond the Ottawa statement

This paper discusses the issue of overriding the right of individual consent to participation in cluster randomised trials (CRTs). We focus on CRTs testing the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical interv...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Public Health Multiple-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Public Health (CPH) is a respected peer-review journal for researchers and practitioners working in public health, health promotion and related fields. It brings together international scholarship to provide critical analyses of theory and practice, reviews of literature and explorations of new ways of working. The journal publishes high quality work that is open and critical in perspective and which reports on current research and debates in the field. CPH encourages an interdisciplinary focus and features innovative analyses. It is committed to exploring and debating issues of equity and social justice; in particular, issues of sexism, racism and other forms of oppression.