以断裂椭圆度衡量化学反应控制的断裂增长

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Natchanan Doungkaew , Peter Eichhubl
{"title":"以断裂椭圆度衡量化学反应控制的断裂增长","authors":"Natchanan Doungkaew ,&nbsp;Peter Eichhubl","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Natural fractures are generally viewed as elliptical in shape, consistent with elastic fracture mechanics. To quantify deviations of fracture shape from theoretically predicted elliptical opening distributions and to evaluate processes leading to non-elliptical fracture shapes, we measured aperture profiles of quartz-cemented opening-mode fractures in low-grade metamorphic sandstone. Ellipticity was quantified by the Lamé n-value, with measured n-values deviating significantly from n = 2 for elliptical shapes, ranging from 0.7 for tapered fractures to 3.2 for blunted fractures.</p><p>While some deviation from n = 2 can be explained by mechanical interaction with nearby fractures and layer boundaries, we explain the generally observed large variation in n values with competing processes between chemically assisted subcritical fracture propagation, leading to preferred fracture length growth and tapered tips for non-recoverable inelastic fracture opening by solution-precipitation creep, and preferred aperture growth and tip blunting by locally enhanced solution-precipitation creep in the fracture tip region. Using geometric models, we show that preferred length growth with non-recoverable fracture opening strain can lead to tapered fractures with n = 1; Preferred aperture growth and opening increments with Lamé n = 3 result in overall blunted fracture shapes with n &gt; 2. We propose that fracture ellipticity provides a measure of chemically reactive fracture growth processes in geological systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture ellipticity as a measure of chemical reaction-controlled fracture growth\",\"authors\":\"Natchanan Doungkaew ,&nbsp;Peter Eichhubl\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Natural fractures are generally viewed as elliptical in shape, consistent with elastic fracture mechanics. To quantify deviations of fracture shape from theoretically predicted elliptical opening distributions and to evaluate processes leading to non-elliptical fracture shapes, we measured aperture profiles of quartz-cemented opening-mode fractures in low-grade metamorphic sandstone. Ellipticity was quantified by the Lamé n-value, with measured n-values deviating significantly from n = 2 for elliptical shapes, ranging from 0.7 for tapered fractures to 3.2 for blunted fractures.</p><p>While some deviation from n = 2 can be explained by mechanical interaction with nearby fractures and layer boundaries, we explain the generally observed large variation in n values with competing processes between chemically assisted subcritical fracture propagation, leading to preferred fracture length growth and tapered tips for non-recoverable inelastic fracture opening by solution-precipitation creep, and preferred aperture growth and tip blunting by locally enhanced solution-precipitation creep in the fracture tip region. Using geometric models, we show that preferred length growth with non-recoverable fracture opening strain can lead to tapered fractures with n = 1; Preferred aperture growth and opening increments with Lamé n = 3 result in overall blunted fracture shapes with n &gt; 2. We propose that fracture ellipticity provides a measure of chemically reactive fracture growth processes in geological systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Geology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124000798\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124000798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然断裂通常被视为椭圆形,与弹性断裂力学相一致。为了量化断裂形状与理论预测的椭圆形开口分布之间的偏差,并评估导致非椭圆形断裂形状的过程,我们测量了低品位变质砂岩中石英胶结开口模式断裂的孔径剖面。椭圆度通过拉梅 n 值进行量化,测得的 n 值明显偏离 n = 2 的椭圆形,从锥形断裂的 0.7 到钝形断裂的 3.2 不等。虽然与 n = 2 的某些偏差可以用与附近断裂和层边界的机械相互作用来解释,但我们认为,n 值的总体观察到的较大变化是由于化学辅助亚临界断裂扩展之间的竞争过程导致的,即溶液沉淀蠕变导致不可恢复的非弹性断裂开口的优先断裂长度增长和锥形尖端,以及断裂尖端区域局部增强的溶液沉淀蠕变导致优先孔径增长和尖端变钝。我们利用几何模型表明,在 n = 1 的情况下,不可恢复断裂开口应变的优先长度增长会导致锥形断裂;在 n > 2 的情况下,Lamé n = 3 的优先孔径增长和开口增量会导致整体断裂形状变钝。 我们提出,断裂椭圆度为地质系统中的化学反应断裂增长过程提供了一个衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fracture ellipticity as a measure of chemical reaction-controlled fracture growth

Natural fractures are generally viewed as elliptical in shape, consistent with elastic fracture mechanics. To quantify deviations of fracture shape from theoretically predicted elliptical opening distributions and to evaluate processes leading to non-elliptical fracture shapes, we measured aperture profiles of quartz-cemented opening-mode fractures in low-grade metamorphic sandstone. Ellipticity was quantified by the Lamé n-value, with measured n-values deviating significantly from n = 2 for elliptical shapes, ranging from 0.7 for tapered fractures to 3.2 for blunted fractures.

While some deviation from n = 2 can be explained by mechanical interaction with nearby fractures and layer boundaries, we explain the generally observed large variation in n values with competing processes between chemically assisted subcritical fracture propagation, leading to preferred fracture length growth and tapered tips for non-recoverable inelastic fracture opening by solution-precipitation creep, and preferred aperture growth and tip blunting by locally enhanced solution-precipitation creep in the fracture tip region. Using geometric models, we show that preferred length growth with non-recoverable fracture opening strain can lead to tapered fractures with n = 1; Preferred aperture growth and opening increments with Lamé n = 3 result in overall blunted fracture shapes with n > 2. We propose that fracture ellipticity provides a measure of chemically reactive fracture growth processes in geological systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Geology
Journal of Structural Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
19.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信