在频谱拍卖中为开放使用频率的买方之间签订协议

{"title":"在频谱拍卖中为开放使用频率的买方之间签订协议","authors":"","doi":"10.3103/s0278641924010059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span> <h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The problem of an unadvertised agreement between buyers of non-exclusive rights at a spectrum auction for the agreed formation of price bids is considered from the viewpoint of game theory and operations research. Such auction participants are potential freeriders claiming free access to the frequencies being sold, which results in their non-standard behavior. Two ways of organizing an agreement for an auction with pricing according to the Vickrey rule are proposed for the full awareness of the participants about the amount of income of the partners from using the range of frequencies purchased by pooling. It is shown that the lack of information results in an equal distribution of payment between negotiating buyers, and this greatly reduces their competitive advantage in a spectrum auction. The Clarke–Groves mechanism that stimulates the identification of true preferences is analyzed and a modified version of it is developed. Unfortunately, analysis shows it does not make sense for any of them to be applied to this problem. An alternative way of choosing a joint solution based on the Germeyer–Vatel model is discussed.</p> </span>","PeriodicalId":501582,"journal":{"name":"Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forming an Agreement between Buyers of Frequencies for Open Access at a Spectrum Auction\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.3103/s0278641924010059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span> <h3>Abstract</h3> <p>The problem of an unadvertised agreement between buyers of non-exclusive rights at a spectrum auction for the agreed formation of price bids is considered from the viewpoint of game theory and operations research. Such auction participants are potential freeriders claiming free access to the frequencies being sold, which results in their non-standard behavior. Two ways of organizing an agreement for an auction with pricing according to the Vickrey rule are proposed for the full awareness of the participants about the amount of income of the partners from using the range of frequencies purchased by pooling. It is shown that the lack of information results in an equal distribution of payment between negotiating buyers, and this greatly reduces their competitive advantage in a spectrum auction. The Clarke–Groves mechanism that stimulates the identification of true preferences is analyzed and a modified version of it is developed. Unfortunately, analysis shows it does not make sense for any of them to be applied to this problem. An alternative way of choosing a joint solution based on the Germeyer–Vatel model is discussed.</p> </span>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0278641924010059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moscow University Computational Mathematics and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3103/s0278641924010059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 本文从博弈论和运筹学的角度探讨了在频谱拍卖中,非独占权买方之间为商定出价而达成的非公开协议问题。这类拍卖参与者是潜在的自由人,他们要求免费获得所拍卖的频率,这导致了他们的非标准行为。本文提出了两种根据维克里规则定价的拍卖协议组织方式,让参与者充分了解合作伙伴从使用集合购买的频率范围中获得的收入数额。结果表明,由于缺乏信息,谈判买方之间的付款分配是均等的,这大大降低了他们在频谱拍卖中的竞争优势。本文分析了克拉克-格罗夫斯机制对识别真实偏好的激励作用,并对其进行了改进。不幸的是,分析表明,任何一种机制应用于这一问题都没有意义。讨论了基于 Germeyer-Vatel 模型选择联合解决方案的另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forming an Agreement between Buyers of Frequencies for Open Access at a Spectrum Auction

Abstract

The problem of an unadvertised agreement between buyers of non-exclusive rights at a spectrum auction for the agreed formation of price bids is considered from the viewpoint of game theory and operations research. Such auction participants are potential freeriders claiming free access to the frequencies being sold, which results in their non-standard behavior. Two ways of organizing an agreement for an auction with pricing according to the Vickrey rule are proposed for the full awareness of the participants about the amount of income of the partners from using the range of frequencies purchased by pooling. It is shown that the lack of information results in an equal distribution of payment between negotiating buyers, and this greatly reduces their competitive advantage in a spectrum auction. The Clarke–Groves mechanism that stimulates the identification of true preferences is analyzed and a modified version of it is developed. Unfortunately, analysis shows it does not make sense for any of them to be applied to this problem. An alternative way of choosing a joint solution based on the Germeyer–Vatel model is discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信