审计客户使用区块链技术对审计会计估计的影响:来自中东的证据

IF 3.3 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Hamada Elsaid Elmaasrawy, Omar Ikbal Tawfik, Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Rahaman
{"title":"审计客户使用区块链技术对审计会计估计的影响:来自中东的证据","authors":"Hamada Elsaid Elmaasrawy, Omar Ikbal Tawfik, Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Rahaman","doi":"10.1108/jfra-08-2023-0499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to examine the effect of audit client’s use of blockchain (BC) on auditing accounting estimates (AEs), especially the inherent risk (IR), control risk (CR) and collection of audit evidence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study used a questionnaire to collect data for a sample of 249 auditors. A partial least squares method is used to test the hypotheses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results showed positive relationship between audit client’s use of BC and both IR and CR when auditing AEs. The results also showed the BC improves the collection of sufficient and appropriate audit evidence when auditing AEs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>This study did not address all the risks associated with auditing AEs, including fraud, detection, sampling and nonsampling risks, and the procedures and tests for auditing AEs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>There are several implications of this research, including that it informs the revision of auditing standards and guidelines to correspond with successive technological changes, which subsequently clarify the roles and responsibilities of auditors, and the study findings will also cause changes to the design and form of audit procedures so as to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is considered the first of its kind that deals with the effects of audit client’s use of BC on audit AEs in the Middle East and North Africa region. This study also presented different sets of measures as proxies for measuring IR, CR and AE.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":15826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of audit client’s use of blockchain technology on auditing accounting estimates: evidence from the Middle East\",\"authors\":\"Hamada Elsaid Elmaasrawy, Omar Ikbal Tawfik, Abdul-Rashid Abdul-Rahaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jfra-08-2023-0499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to examine the effect of audit client’s use of blockchain (BC) on auditing accounting estimates (AEs), especially the inherent risk (IR), control risk (CR) and collection of audit evidence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The study used a questionnaire to collect data for a sample of 249 auditors. A partial least squares method is used to test the hypotheses.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The results showed positive relationship between audit client’s use of BC and both IR and CR when auditing AEs. The results also showed the BC improves the collection of sufficient and appropriate audit evidence when auditing AEs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>This study did not address all the risks associated with auditing AEs, including fraud, detection, sampling and nonsampling risks, and the procedures and tests for auditing AEs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>There are several implications of this research, including that it informs the revision of auditing standards and guidelines to correspond with successive technological changes, which subsequently clarify the roles and responsibilities of auditors, and the study findings will also cause changes to the design and form of audit procedures so as to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is considered the first of its kind that deals with the effects of audit client’s use of BC on audit AEs in the Middle East and North Africa region. This study also presented different sets of measures as proxies for measuring IR, CR and AE.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":15826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-08-2023-0499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-08-2023-0499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨审计客户使用区块链(BC)对审计会计估计(AEs)的影响,尤其是对固有风险(IR)、控制风险(CR)和审计证据收集的影响。研究结果表明,审计客户在审计 AE 时使用 BC 与 IR 和 CR 之间存在正相关关系。研究局限性/意义本研究并未涉及与审计资产评估相关的所有风险,包括欺诈、检测、抽样和非抽样风险,以及资产评估审计的程序和测试。实际意义本研究有几个方面的意义,包括它为修订审计准则和指南提供了信息,使之与相继发生的技术变革相适应,从而明确了审计师的角色和责任,而且研究结果还将促使审计程序的设计和形式发生变化,以获取充分、适当的审计证据。 原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究被认为是中东和北非地区首个涉及审计客户使用业连对审计预期成果影响的同类研究。本研究还提出了不同的衡量标准,作为衡量内部审计、外部审计和审计结果的替代指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of audit client’s use of blockchain technology on auditing accounting estimates: evidence from the Middle East

Purpose

This study aims to examine the effect of audit client’s use of blockchain (BC) on auditing accounting estimates (AEs), especially the inherent risk (IR), control risk (CR) and collection of audit evidence.

Design/methodology/approach

The study used a questionnaire to collect data for a sample of 249 auditors. A partial least squares method is used to test the hypotheses.

Findings

The results showed positive relationship between audit client’s use of BC and both IR and CR when auditing AEs. The results also showed the BC improves the collection of sufficient and appropriate audit evidence when auditing AEs.

Research limitations/implications

This study did not address all the risks associated with auditing AEs, including fraud, detection, sampling and nonsampling risks, and the procedures and tests for auditing AEs.

Practical implications

There are several implications of this research, including that it informs the revision of auditing standards and guidelines to correspond with successive technological changes, which subsequently clarify the roles and responsibilities of auditors, and the study findings will also cause changes to the design and form of audit procedures so as to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is considered the first of its kind that deals with the effects of audit client’s use of BC on audit AEs in the Middle East and North Africa region. This study also presented different sets of measures as proxies for measuring IR, CR and AE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信