COVID-19 在埃塞俄比亚的流行:社会经济影响和政府恢复措施

IF 1.6 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Victor Nechifor, Ole Boysen, Emanuele Ferrari, Kidanemariam Hailu, Mohammed Beshir
{"title":"COVID-19 在埃塞俄比亚的流行:社会经济影响和政府恢复措施","authors":"Victor Nechifor, Ole Boysen, Emanuele Ferrari, Kidanemariam Hailu, Mohammed Beshir","doi":"10.1111/saje.12374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study assesses the implications of the COVID‐19 pandemic and the government responses for the economic performance and poverty incidence in Ethiopia for the fiscal years of 2019/20 and 2020/21. It accounts for the impacts of the pandemic on factor productivity, trade costs, export demand, tourism, remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI). An economy‐wide multi‐sectoral model determines impacts at macroeconomic, sectoral, and household levels. A poverty analysis module characterises the effects of the pandemic on food poverty headcount, gap, and severity. Results show that the COVID‐19 impacts could have been significant across all macroeconomic metrics had the government not intervened through fiscal and spending measures. However, much of the recovery through government intervention was driven by agricultural and food processing sectors while output in manufacturing, construction and services sectors continued to be negatively affected. Without government intervention, the food poverty headcount would have increased by about five percentage points. The government measures have mitigated that effect allowing food poverty to reach pre‐COVID‐19 values in 2020/21. Nevertheless, with all measures combined, poor urban households may have been left behind and would require more targeted support to compensate for a significant loss of income.","PeriodicalId":46929,"journal":{"name":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID‐19 pandemic in Ethiopia: Socioeconomic impacts and government recovery measures\",\"authors\":\"Victor Nechifor, Ole Boysen, Emanuele Ferrari, Kidanemariam Hailu, Mohammed Beshir\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/saje.12374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study assesses the implications of the COVID‐19 pandemic and the government responses for the economic performance and poverty incidence in Ethiopia for the fiscal years of 2019/20 and 2020/21. It accounts for the impacts of the pandemic on factor productivity, trade costs, export demand, tourism, remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI). An economy‐wide multi‐sectoral model determines impacts at macroeconomic, sectoral, and household levels. A poverty analysis module characterises the effects of the pandemic on food poverty headcount, gap, and severity. Results show that the COVID‐19 impacts could have been significant across all macroeconomic metrics had the government not intervened through fiscal and spending measures. However, much of the recovery through government intervention was driven by agricultural and food processing sectors while output in manufacturing, construction and services sectors continued to be negatively affected. Without government intervention, the food poverty headcount would have increased by about five percentage points. The government measures have mitigated that effect allowing food poverty to reach pre‐COVID‐19 values in 2020/21. Nevertheless, with all measures combined, poor urban households may have been left behind and would require more targeted support to compensate for a significant loss of income.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12374\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12374","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了 COVID-19 大流行病和政府应对措施对埃塞俄比亚 2019/20 和 2020/21 财政年度经济表现和贫困发生率的影响。研究说明了大流行病对要素生产率、贸易成本、出口需求、旅游业、汇款和外国直接投资(FDI)的影响。整个经济的多部门模型确定了宏观经济、部门和家庭层面的影响。贫困分析模块描述了大流行病对粮食贫困人口、差距和严重程度的影响。结果表明,如果政府没有通过财政和支出措施进行干预,COVID-19 对所有宏观经济指标的影响都会很大。然而,通过政府干预实现的复苏主要是由农业和食品加工部门推动的,而制造业、建筑业和服务业的产出则继续受到负面影响。如果没有政府干预,粮食贫困人口会增加约五个百分点。政府的措施减轻了这一影响,使粮食贫困率在 2020/21 年达到《19 世纪议程》之前的数值。然而,综合所有措施,城市贫困家庭可能会被抛在后面,需要更有针对性的支持来弥补收入的重大损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID‐19 pandemic in Ethiopia: Socioeconomic impacts and government recovery measures
The study assesses the implications of the COVID‐19 pandemic and the government responses for the economic performance and poverty incidence in Ethiopia for the fiscal years of 2019/20 and 2020/21. It accounts for the impacts of the pandemic on factor productivity, trade costs, export demand, tourism, remittances and foreign direct investment (FDI). An economy‐wide multi‐sectoral model determines impacts at macroeconomic, sectoral, and household levels. A poverty analysis module characterises the effects of the pandemic on food poverty headcount, gap, and severity. Results show that the COVID‐19 impacts could have been significant across all macroeconomic metrics had the government not intervened through fiscal and spending measures. However, much of the recovery through government intervention was driven by agricultural and food processing sectors while output in manufacturing, construction and services sectors continued to be negatively affected. Without government intervention, the food poverty headcount would have increased by about five percentage points. The government measures have mitigated that effect allowing food poverty to reach pre‐COVID‐19 values in 2020/21. Nevertheless, with all measures combined, poor urban households may have been left behind and would require more targeted support to compensate for a significant loss of income.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Economics (SAJE) has a long and distinguished history, ranking amongst the oldest generalist journals in economics. In terms of editorial focus, the journal remains a generalist journal covering all fields in economics, but with a particular focus on developmental and African contexts. Toward this end, the editorial policy of the SAJE emphasizes scholarly work on developing countries, with African and Southern African development challenges receiving particular attention. While the SAJE remains a generalist journal, it encourages empirical work on developing and African economies. Importantly the focus is on both theoretical developments and methodological innovations that reflect developing country and African contexts and the policy challenges they pose. The objective of the journal is to be the premier vehicle for the publication of the most innovative work on development country and particularly African economic problems. It aims to be the target journal of choice not only for scholars located in Southern Africa, but of any scholar interested in the analysis of development challenges and their African applications. Clear theoretical foundations to work published should be a hallmark of the journal, and innovation in both theory and empirics appropriate to developing country and the African contexts are encouraged. In terms of submissions, the journal invites submissions primarily of original research articles, as well as survey articles and book reviews relevant to its context. In the case of both survey articles and book reviews, authors should note that a key minimum requirement is a critical reflection on the broader context of the existing literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信