虚拟现实局部麻醉下取回卵母细胞过程中 ANI 评估的相对副交感神经张力的变化:一项随机、对照、单中心、开放式研究

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Florent Malard, Ludovic Moy, Vincent Denoual, Helene Beloeil, Emilie Leblong
{"title":"虚拟现实局部麻醉下取回卵母细胞过程中 ANI 评估的相对副交感神经张力的变化:一项随机、对照、单中心、开放式研究","authors":"Florent Malard, Ludovic Moy, Vincent Denoual, Helene Beloeil, Emilie Leblong","doi":"10.1007/s10916-024-02057-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transvaginal oocyte retrieval is an outpatient procedure performed under local anaesthesia. Hypno-analgesia could be effective in managing comfort during this procedure. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a virtual reality headset as an adjunct to local anaesthesia in managing nociception during oocyte retrieval. This was a prospective, randomized single-centre study including patients undergoing oocyte retrieval under local anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (virtual reality headset + local anaesthesia) or the control group (local anaesthesia). The primary outcome was the efficacy on the ANI<sup>®</sup>, which reflects the relative parasympathetic tone. Secondary outcomes included pain, anxiety, conversion to general anaesthesia rate, procedural duration, patient’s and gynaecologist’s satisfaction and virtual reality headset tolerance. ANI was significantly lower in the virtual reality group during the whole procedure <i>(mean ANI: 79 95 CI [77; 81] vs 74 95 CI [72; 76]; p</i> &lt; <i>0.001; effect size Cohen’s d -0.53 [-0.83, -0.23])</i>, and during the two most painful moments: infiltration (mean ANI: 81 +/- 11 vs 74 +/- 13; p &lt; 0.001; <i>effect size Cohen’s d -0.54[-0.85, -0.24]</i>) and oocytes retrieval <i>(mean ANI: 78 </i>+/- <i>11 vs 74.40 </i>+/- <i>11; p</i> = <i>0.020; effect size Cohen’s d -0.37 [-0.67, -0.07]).</i>There was no significant difference in pain measured by VAS. No serious adverse events related were reported. The integration of virtual reality as an hypnotic tool during oocyte retrieval under local anaesthesia in assisted reproductive techniques could improve patient’s comfort and experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations of the Relative Parasympathetic Tone Assessed by ANI During Oocyte Retrieval Under Local Anaesthesia with Virtual Reality : A Randomized, Controlled, Monocentric, Open Study\",\"authors\":\"Florent Malard, Ludovic Moy, Vincent Denoual, Helene Beloeil, Emilie Leblong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-024-02057-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Transvaginal oocyte retrieval is an outpatient procedure performed under local anaesthesia. Hypno-analgesia could be effective in managing comfort during this procedure. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a virtual reality headset as an adjunct to local anaesthesia in managing nociception during oocyte retrieval. This was a prospective, randomized single-centre study including patients undergoing oocyte retrieval under local anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (virtual reality headset + local anaesthesia) or the control group (local anaesthesia). The primary outcome was the efficacy on the ANI<sup>®</sup>, which reflects the relative parasympathetic tone. Secondary outcomes included pain, anxiety, conversion to general anaesthesia rate, procedural duration, patient’s and gynaecologist’s satisfaction and virtual reality headset tolerance. ANI was significantly lower in the virtual reality group during the whole procedure <i>(mean ANI: 79 95 CI [77; 81] vs 74 95 CI [72; 76]; p</i> &lt; <i>0.001; effect size Cohen’s d -0.53 [-0.83, -0.23])</i>, and during the two most painful moments: infiltration (mean ANI: 81 +/- 11 vs 74 +/- 13; p &lt; 0.001; <i>effect size Cohen’s d -0.54[-0.85, -0.24]</i>) and oocytes retrieval <i>(mean ANI: 78 </i>+/- <i>11 vs 74.40 </i>+/- <i>11; p</i> = <i>0.020; effect size Cohen’s d -0.37 [-0.67, -0.07]).</i>There was no significant difference in pain measured by VAS. No serious adverse events related were reported. The integration of virtual reality as an hypnotic tool during oocyte retrieval under local anaesthesia in assisted reproductive techniques could improve patient’s comfort and experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02057-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02057-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经阴道取卵术是在局部麻醉下进行的门诊手术。催眠镇痛可有效控制手术过程中的舒适度。本研究旨在评估虚拟现实耳机作为局部麻醉的辅助手段,在卵母细胞取回术中控制痛觉的效果。这是一项前瞻性随机单中心研究,包括在局部麻醉下进行卵母细胞提取的患者。患者被随机分配到干预组(虚拟现实耳机+局部麻醉)或对照组(局部麻醉)。主要结果是 ANI® 的疗效,它反映了相对副交感神经张力。次要结果包括疼痛、焦虑、全身麻醉转换率、手术持续时间、患者和妇科医生的满意度以及对虚拟现实耳机的耐受性。在整个手术过程中,虚拟现实组的 ANI 明显较低(平均 ANI:79 95 CI [77; 81] vs 74 95 CI [72; 76];p < 0.001;效应大小 Cohen's d -0.53 [-0.83, -0.23]),而在两个最痛苦的时刻:浸润(平均 ANI:81 +/- 11 vs 74 +/- 13;p < 0.001;效应大小 Cohen's d -0.54[-0.85,-0.24])和取卵(平均 ANI:78 +/- 11 vs 74.40 +/-11;p = 0.020;效应大小 Cohen's d -0.37 [-0.67,-0.07])。无严重不良事件报告。在辅助生殖技术的局部麻醉下取卵过程中,将虚拟现实技术作为催眠工具可提高患者的舒适度和体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Variations of the Relative Parasympathetic Tone Assessed by ANI During Oocyte Retrieval Under Local Anaesthesia with Virtual Reality : A Randomized, Controlled, Monocentric, Open Study

Variations of the Relative Parasympathetic Tone Assessed by ANI During Oocyte Retrieval Under Local Anaesthesia with Virtual Reality : A Randomized, Controlled, Monocentric, Open Study

Transvaginal oocyte retrieval is an outpatient procedure performed under local anaesthesia. Hypno-analgesia could be effective in managing comfort during this procedure. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a virtual reality headset as an adjunct to local anaesthesia in managing nociception during oocyte retrieval. This was a prospective, randomized single-centre study including patients undergoing oocyte retrieval under local anaesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (virtual reality headset + local anaesthesia) or the control group (local anaesthesia). The primary outcome was the efficacy on the ANI®, which reflects the relative parasympathetic tone. Secondary outcomes included pain, anxiety, conversion to general anaesthesia rate, procedural duration, patient’s and gynaecologist’s satisfaction and virtual reality headset tolerance. ANI was significantly lower in the virtual reality group during the whole procedure (mean ANI: 79 95 CI [77; 81] vs 74 95 CI [72; 76]; p < 0.001; effect size Cohen’s d -0.53 [-0.83, -0.23]), and during the two most painful moments: infiltration (mean ANI: 81 +/- 11 vs 74 +/- 13; p < 0.001; effect size Cohen’s d -0.54[-0.85, -0.24]) and oocytes retrieval (mean ANI: 78 +/- 11 vs 74.40 +/- 11; p = 0.020; effect size Cohen’s d -0.37 [-0.67, -0.07]).There was no significant difference in pain measured by VAS. No serious adverse events related were reported. The integration of virtual reality as an hypnotic tool during oocyte retrieval under local anaesthesia in assisted reproductive techniques could improve patient’s comfort and experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信