I. Oftebro, S. A. Skjaker, H. L. Fridheim, F. Frihagen, H. E. Meyer, L. Nordsletten, L. B. Solberg
{"title":"挪威奥斯陆桡骨远端骨折发病率下降","authors":"I. Oftebro, S. A. Skjaker, H. L. Fridheim, F. Frihagen, H. E. Meyer, L. Nordsletten, L. B. Solberg","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01383-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">\n<i>Summary</i>\n</h3><p>This study reported the incidence of validated adult distal radius fractures in Oslo, Norway, in 2019. The incidence has been reduced over the last 20 years. However, it is still high compared to other regions in Norway and some of the other Nordic countries.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>We aimed to report the incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo in 2019 and compare it to the incidence rates in 1998/1999.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients aged ≥ 20 years resident in Oslo sustaining a distal radius fracture in 2019 were identified by electronic diagnosis registers, patient protocols, and/or radiology registers. The diagnosis was verified using medical records and/or radiology descriptions. We used the same method as the previous study from Oslo, making the comparison over time more accurate. The age-adjusted incidence rates and the age-standardized incidence rate ratio (IRR) were calculated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The absolute number of fractures decreased from 1490 in 1998/1999 to 1395 in 2019. The IRR for women and men in the age group ≥ 20 years in 2019 compared to 1998/1999 was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71–0.84) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90), respectively. The IRR for women and men in the age group ≥ 50 years in 2019 compared to 1998/1999 was 0.78 (95% CI 0.71–0.86) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.63–0.97), respectively. For the population in Oslo with Asian background compared to Norwegian background in the age group ≥ 50 years, the IRR in 2019 was 0.57 (95% CI 0.40–0.80) for women and 0.77 (95% CI 0.44–1.37) for men.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo has decreased over the last 20 years. It is still, however, higher than in other areas of Norway and in some of the other Nordic countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decrease in incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo, Norway\",\"authors\":\"I. Oftebro, S. A. Skjaker, H. L. Fridheim, F. Frihagen, H. E. Meyer, L. Nordsletten, L. B. Solberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11657-024-01383-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">\\n<i>Summary</i>\\n</h3><p>This study reported the incidence of validated adult distal radius fractures in Oslo, Norway, in 2019. The incidence has been reduced over the last 20 years. However, it is still high compared to other regions in Norway and some of the other Nordic countries.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>We aimed to report the incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo in 2019 and compare it to the incidence rates in 1998/1999.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Patients aged ≥ 20 years resident in Oslo sustaining a distal radius fracture in 2019 were identified by electronic diagnosis registers, patient protocols, and/or radiology registers. The diagnosis was verified using medical records and/or radiology descriptions. We used the same method as the previous study from Oslo, making the comparison over time more accurate. The age-adjusted incidence rates and the age-standardized incidence rate ratio (IRR) were calculated.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The absolute number of fractures decreased from 1490 in 1998/1999 to 1395 in 2019. The IRR for women and men in the age group ≥ 20 years in 2019 compared to 1998/1999 was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71–0.84) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90), respectively. The IRR for women and men in the age group ≥ 50 years in 2019 compared to 1998/1999 was 0.78 (95% CI 0.71–0.86) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.63–0.97), respectively. For the population in Oslo with Asian background compared to Norwegian background in the age group ≥ 50 years, the IRR in 2019 was 0.57 (95% CI 0.40–0.80) for women and 0.77 (95% CI 0.44–1.37) for men.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo has decreased over the last 20 years. It is still, however, higher than in other areas of Norway and in some of the other Nordic countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01383-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01383-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本研究报告了2019年挪威奥斯陆经证实的成人桡骨远端骨折发生率。在过去20年中,发病率有所下降。目的我们旨在报告2019年奥斯陆桡骨远端骨折的发病率,并将其与1998/1999年的发病率进行比较。方法通过电子诊断登记簿、患者协议和/或放射登记簿确定2019年桡骨远端骨折的年龄≥20岁的奥斯陆居民患者。诊断结果通过医疗记录和/或放射学描述进行核实。我们采用的方法与奥斯陆的前一项研究相同,从而使时间上的比较更加准确。结果骨折的绝对数量从 1998/1999 年的 1490 例降至 2019 年的 1395 例。与1998/1999年相比,2019年年龄组≥20岁的女性和男性的IRR分别为0.77(95% CI 0.71-0.84)和0.77(95% CI 0.66-0.90)。与 1998/1999 年相比,2019 年年龄组≥ 50 岁的女性和男性的 IRR 分别为 0.78(95% CI 0.71-0.86)和 0.78(95% CI 0.63-0.97)。在奥斯陆,与挪威背景相比,在年龄组≥50岁的亚裔人口中,2019年女性的IRR为0.57(95% CI 0.40-0.80),男性为0.77(95% CI 0.44-1.37)。奥斯陆的桡骨远端骨折发病率在过去20年中有所下降,但仍高于挪威其他地区和其他一些北欧国家。
Decrease in incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo, Norway
Summary
This study reported the incidence of validated adult distal radius fractures in Oslo, Norway, in 2019. The incidence has been reduced over the last 20 years. However, it is still high compared to other regions in Norway and some of the other Nordic countries.
Purpose
We aimed to report the incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo in 2019 and compare it to the incidence rates in 1998/1999.
Methods
Patients aged ≥ 20 years resident in Oslo sustaining a distal radius fracture in 2019 were identified by electronic diagnosis registers, patient protocols, and/or radiology registers. The diagnosis was verified using medical records and/or radiology descriptions. We used the same method as the previous study from Oslo, making the comparison over time more accurate. The age-adjusted incidence rates and the age-standardized incidence rate ratio (IRR) were calculated.
Results
The absolute number of fractures decreased from 1490 in 1998/1999 to 1395 in 2019. The IRR for women and men in the age group ≥ 20 years in 2019 compared to 1998/1999 was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71–0.84) and 0.77 (95% CI 0.66–0.90), respectively. The IRR for women and men in the age group ≥ 50 years in 2019 compared to 1998/1999 was 0.78 (95% CI 0.71–0.86) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.63–0.97), respectively. For the population in Oslo with Asian background compared to Norwegian background in the age group ≥ 50 years, the IRR in 2019 was 0.57 (95% CI 0.40–0.80) for women and 0.77 (95% CI 0.44–1.37) for men.
Conclusions
The incidence of distal radius fractures in Oslo has decreased over the last 20 years. It is still, however, higher than in other areas of Norway and in some of the other Nordic countries.