双向外商直接投资能否促进 "一带一路 "国家的绿色技术外溢?基于技术差距调节变量的分析

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Liguo Zhang, Suining Gan, Cuiting Jiang, Xiang Cai
{"title":"双向外商直接投资能否促进 \"一带一路 \"国家的绿色技术外溢?基于技术差距调节变量的分析","authors":"Liguo Zhang, Suining Gan, Cuiting Jiang, Xiang Cai","doi":"10.1007/s10651-024-00607-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid growth of two-way foreign direct investment (FDI) is a striking feature of the Belt and Road (B&amp;R). Can two-way FDI promote green technology spillover (GTS) from the B&amp;R countries? Does the technology gap moderate GTS? And what is the underlying mechanism? To this end, this paper systematically analyses the impact of two-way FDI on GTS based on panel data of 64 B&amp;R countries from 2001 to 2020. Three significant findings were obtained: first, there is a dynamic effect between two-way FDI and GTS, and the technology gap always adjusts this relationship positively. Second, \"Iron needs to be hard.\" Whether \"going out\" or \"coming in,\" GTS is confined to a certain extent. The B&amp;R countries must rely on their capabilities to build higher-quality, independently controllable key technology chains. Finally, the technology effect of two-way FDI always inhibits GTS, and the technology gap between the B&amp;R countries and technology frontier countries is the \"valley of death\" which is difficult to cross but has to cross. These findings have targeted policy implications for the B&amp;R countries to capture better GTS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50519,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can two-way Foreign Direct Investment promote green technology spillover in Belt and Road countries? An analysis based on the moderator variable of the technology gap\",\"authors\":\"Liguo Zhang, Suining Gan, Cuiting Jiang, Xiang Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10651-024-00607-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The rapid growth of two-way foreign direct investment (FDI) is a striking feature of the Belt and Road (B&amp;R). Can two-way FDI promote green technology spillover (GTS) from the B&amp;R countries? Does the technology gap moderate GTS? And what is the underlying mechanism? To this end, this paper systematically analyses the impact of two-way FDI on GTS based on panel data of 64 B&amp;R countries from 2001 to 2020. Three significant findings were obtained: first, there is a dynamic effect between two-way FDI and GTS, and the technology gap always adjusts this relationship positively. Second, \\\"Iron needs to be hard.\\\" Whether \\\"going out\\\" or \\\"coming in,\\\" GTS is confined to a certain extent. The B&amp;R countries must rely on their capabilities to build higher-quality, independently controllable key technology chains. Finally, the technology effect of two-way FDI always inhibits GTS, and the technology gap between the B&amp;R countries and technology frontier countries is the \\\"valley of death\\\" which is difficult to cross but has to cross. These findings have targeted policy implications for the B&amp;R countries to capture better GTS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Ecological Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00607-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Ecological Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-024-00607-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双向外国直接投资(FDI)的快速增长是 "一带一路"(B&R)的一个显著特点。双向外国直接投资能否促进 "一带一路 "国家的绿色技术外溢?技术差距是否会缓和绿色技术外溢?其内在机制又是什么?为此,本文基于2001-2020年64个B&R国家的面板数据,系统分析了双向FDI对GTS的影响。本文得出了三个重要结论:第一,双向 FDI 与 GTS 之间存在动态效应,且技术差距总是对这种关系起到正向调节作用。第二,"打铁还需自身硬"。无论是 "走出去 "还是 "引进来",全球贸易体系都受到一定程度的限制。B&R国家必须依靠自身能力,打造更高质量、自主可控的关键技术链。最后,双向外国直接投资的技术效应始终抑制着全球技术转移,B&R 国家与技术前沿国家之间的技术差距是难以跨越却又不得不跨越的 "死亡之谷"。这些研究结果具有针对性的政策启示,有助于 "一带一路 "国家更好地抓住全球贸易机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can two-way Foreign Direct Investment promote green technology spillover in Belt and Road countries? An analysis based on the moderator variable of the technology gap

The rapid growth of two-way foreign direct investment (FDI) is a striking feature of the Belt and Road (B&R). Can two-way FDI promote green technology spillover (GTS) from the B&R countries? Does the technology gap moderate GTS? And what is the underlying mechanism? To this end, this paper systematically analyses the impact of two-way FDI on GTS based on panel data of 64 B&R countries from 2001 to 2020. Three significant findings were obtained: first, there is a dynamic effect between two-way FDI and GTS, and the technology gap always adjusts this relationship positively. Second, "Iron needs to be hard." Whether "going out" or "coming in," GTS is confined to a certain extent. The B&R countries must rely on their capabilities to build higher-quality, independently controllable key technology chains. Finally, the technology effect of two-way FDI always inhibits GTS, and the technology gap between the B&R countries and technology frontier countries is the "valley of death" which is difficult to cross but has to cross. These findings have targeted policy implications for the B&R countries to capture better GTS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Ecological Statistics
Environmental and Ecological Statistics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental and Ecological Statistics publishes papers on practical applications of statistics and related quantitative methods to environmental science addressing contemporary issues. Emphasis is on applied mathematical statistics, statistical methodology, and data interpretation and improvement for future use, with a view to advance statistics for environment, ecology and environmental health, and to advance environmental theory and practice using valid statistics. Besides clarity of exposition, a single most important criterion for publication is the appropriateness of the statistical method to the particular environmental problem. The Journal covers all aspects of the collection, analysis, presentation and interpretation of environmental data for research, policy and regulation. The Journal is cross-disciplinary within the context of contemporary environmental issues and the associated statistical tools, concepts and methods. The Journal broadly covers theory and methods, case studies and applications, environmental change and statistical ecology, environmental health statistics and stochastics, and related areas. Special features include invited discussion papers; research communications; technical notes and consultation corner; mini-reviews; letters to the Editor; news, views and announcements; hardware and software reviews; data management etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信