Lingxia Wang, Xiaodong Nie, Jiaqi Li, Yaojun Liu, Hui Wang, Yazhe Li, Zhongwu Li
{"title":"侵蚀引起的恢复性二氧化碳汇抵消了流域尺度上的水平土壤有机碳清除量","authors":"Lingxia Wang, Xiaodong Nie, Jiaqi Li, Yaojun Liu, Hui Wang, Yazhe Li, Zhongwu Li","doi":"10.1007/s11430-023-1275-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To improve soil carbon sequestration capacity, the full soil carbon cycle process needs to be understood and quantified. It is essential to evaluate whether water erosion acts as a net source or sink of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> at the basin scale, which encompasses the entire hydrological process. This study introduced an approach that combined a spatially distributed sediment delivery model and biogeochemical model to estimate the lateral and vertical carbon fluxes by water erosion at the basin scale. Applying this coupling model to the Dongting Lake Basin, the results showed that the annual average amount of soil erosion during 1980–2020 was 1.33×10<sup>8</sup> t, displaying a decreasing trend followed by a slight increase. Only 12% of the soil organic carbon displacement was ultimately lost in the riverine systems, and the rest was deposited downhill within the basin. The average lateral soil organic carbon loss induced by erosion was 8.86×10<sup>11</sup> g C in 1980 and 1.50×10<sup>11</sup> g C in 2020, with a decline rate of 83%. A net land sink for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> of 5.54×10<sup>11</sup> g C a<sup>−1</sup> occurred during erosion, primarily through sediment burial and dynamic replacement. However, ecological restoration projects and tillage practice policies are still significant in reducing erosion, which could improve the capacity of the carbon sink for recovery beyond the rate of horizontal carbon removal. Moreover, our model enables the spatial explicit simulation of erosion-induced carbon fluxes using cost-effective and easily accessible input data across large spatial scales and long timeframes. Consequently, it offers a valuable tool for predicting the interactions between carbon dynamics, land use changes, and future climate.</p>","PeriodicalId":21651,"journal":{"name":"Science China Earth Sciences","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erosion-induced recovery CO2 sink offset the horizontal soil organic carbon removal at the basin scale\",\"authors\":\"Lingxia Wang, Xiaodong Nie, Jiaqi Li, Yaojun Liu, Hui Wang, Yazhe Li, Zhongwu Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11430-023-1275-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To improve soil carbon sequestration capacity, the full soil carbon cycle process needs to be understood and quantified. It is essential to evaluate whether water erosion acts as a net source or sink of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> at the basin scale, which encompasses the entire hydrological process. This study introduced an approach that combined a spatially distributed sediment delivery model and biogeochemical model to estimate the lateral and vertical carbon fluxes by water erosion at the basin scale. Applying this coupling model to the Dongting Lake Basin, the results showed that the annual average amount of soil erosion during 1980–2020 was 1.33×10<sup>8</sup> t, displaying a decreasing trend followed by a slight increase. Only 12% of the soil organic carbon displacement was ultimately lost in the riverine systems, and the rest was deposited downhill within the basin. The average lateral soil organic carbon loss induced by erosion was 8.86×10<sup>11</sup> g C in 1980 and 1.50×10<sup>11</sup> g C in 2020, with a decline rate of 83%. A net land sink for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> of 5.54×10<sup>11</sup> g C a<sup>−1</sup> occurred during erosion, primarily through sediment burial and dynamic replacement. However, ecological restoration projects and tillage practice policies are still significant in reducing erosion, which could improve the capacity of the carbon sink for recovery beyond the rate of horizontal carbon removal. Moreover, our model enables the spatial explicit simulation of erosion-induced carbon fluxes using cost-effective and easily accessible input data across large spatial scales and long timeframes. Consequently, it offers a valuable tool for predicting the interactions between carbon dynamics, land use changes, and future climate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science China Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science China Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1275-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science China Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-023-1275-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了提高土壤固碳能力,需要了解和量化整个土壤碳循环过程。流域尺度包括整个水文过程,因此必须评估水侵蚀是大气二氧化碳的净源还是净汇。本研究介绍了一种结合空间分布式沉积物输送模型和生物地球化学模型的方法,以估算流域尺度上水蚀作用的横向和纵向碳通量。将该耦合模型应用于洞庭湖流域,结果表明,1980-2020年间,洞庭湖流域年均土壤侵蚀量为1.33×108 t,呈先减后增的趋势。在流失的土壤有机碳中,只有 12% 最终在河流水系中流失,其余均在流域内顺坡沉积。水土流失造成的土壤有机碳横向平均损失量在 1980 年为 8.86×1011 g C,2020 年为 1.50×1011 g C,下降率为 83%。在侵蚀过程中,主要通过沉积物掩埋和动态置换,出现了 5.54×1011 g C a-1 的大气二氧化碳净土地汇。然而,生态恢复项目和耕作实践政策在减少侵蚀方面仍具有重要作用,可提高碳汇的恢复能力,使其超过水平碳清除率。此外,我们的模型还能利用成本效益高且易于获取的输入数据,在大空间尺度和长时间范围内对侵蚀引起的碳通量进行空间显式模拟。因此,它为预测碳动态、土地利用变化和未来气候之间的相互作用提供了宝贵的工具。
Erosion-induced recovery CO2 sink offset the horizontal soil organic carbon removal at the basin scale
To improve soil carbon sequestration capacity, the full soil carbon cycle process needs to be understood and quantified. It is essential to evaluate whether water erosion acts as a net source or sink of atmospheric CO2 at the basin scale, which encompasses the entire hydrological process. This study introduced an approach that combined a spatially distributed sediment delivery model and biogeochemical model to estimate the lateral and vertical carbon fluxes by water erosion at the basin scale. Applying this coupling model to the Dongting Lake Basin, the results showed that the annual average amount of soil erosion during 1980–2020 was 1.33×108 t, displaying a decreasing trend followed by a slight increase. Only 12% of the soil organic carbon displacement was ultimately lost in the riverine systems, and the rest was deposited downhill within the basin. The average lateral soil organic carbon loss induced by erosion was 8.86×1011 g C in 1980 and 1.50×1011 g C in 2020, with a decline rate of 83%. A net land sink for atmospheric CO2 of 5.54×1011 g C a−1 occurred during erosion, primarily through sediment burial and dynamic replacement. However, ecological restoration projects and tillage practice policies are still significant in reducing erosion, which could improve the capacity of the carbon sink for recovery beyond the rate of horizontal carbon removal. Moreover, our model enables the spatial explicit simulation of erosion-induced carbon fluxes using cost-effective and easily accessible input data across large spatial scales and long timeframes. Consequently, it offers a valuable tool for predicting the interactions between carbon dynamics, land use changes, and future climate.
期刊介绍:
Science China Earth Sciences, an academic journal cosponsored by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and published by Science China Press, is committed to publishing high-quality, original results in both basic and applied research.