206 宫颈癌差异:印第安纳州莱克县西班牙裔/拉美裔妇女对宫颈癌的了解、筛查和采用检测方式的意愿

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Layla Claure, Lara Balian, Natalia Rodriguez
{"title":"206 宫颈癌差异:印第安纳州莱克县西班牙裔/拉美裔妇女对宫颈癌的了解、筛查和采用检测方式的意愿","authors":"Layla Claure, Lara Balian, Natalia Rodriguez","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There are notable disparities in cervical cancer screening. Theobjective of this study was to examine knowledge, screening practices, attitudes towards cervical cancer screening, and willingness to adopt screening innovations such as self-sampling and HPV rapid testing for cervical cancer among Hispanic women in Lake County, Indiana. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This mixed-methods study encompassed an online cross-sectional survey (n=231) and in-depth interviews (n=9) of individuals with a cervix aged 21-65 residing in Lake County, Indiana. Outcome variables focused on cervical cancer knowledge, willingness to adopt self-sampling, and willingness to adopt HPV rapid testing. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages. A cervical cancer knowledge score was computed from 7 questions. Scores below the mean 3.62 were labeled ‘low’ while higher scores were ‘high’. We also examined associations between demographic and outcome variables. Quantitative analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Qualitative analysis was conducted using NVIVO software to thematically analyze interviews using deductive and inductive coding techniques. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Majority of participants identified as Hispanic (58%), aged 31 or older (58%). While 80.5% reported being screened for cervical cancer, only 44.6% demonstrated ‘high' cervical cancer knowledge. 89.6% felt screening is important as emphasized in qualitative findings for its preventive value. Over half were willing to take their vaginal swab in clinic (55.8%) and at home (51.9%). However, among the Hispanic/Latinx groups reluctance to adopt self-sampling was notable (56.7% in clinic and 62.7% at home). Qualitative analysis revealed concerns about test accuracy. Willingness to use a hypothetical HPV rapid had higher acceptance (69.7%), with 52.2% in the Hispanic/Latinx group. Qualitative findings highlight benefits like increased screening access, comfort, and convenience offered by an HPV rapid test. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Hispanic/Latinx women in the sample were less willing to adopt cervical cancer screening methods such as self-sampling and rapid testing compared to non-Hispanic whites. Despite being considered beneficial for testing among vulnerable populations, our study found limited acceptance from these populations for various reasons.","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"206 Cervical Cancer Disparities: Knowledge, Screening and Willingness to adopt testing modalities among Hispanic/Latinx Women in Lake County, Indiana\",\"authors\":\"Layla Claure, Lara Balian, Natalia Rodriguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2024.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There are notable disparities in cervical cancer screening. Theobjective of this study was to examine knowledge, screening practices, attitudes towards cervical cancer screening, and willingness to adopt screening innovations such as self-sampling and HPV rapid testing for cervical cancer among Hispanic women in Lake County, Indiana. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This mixed-methods study encompassed an online cross-sectional survey (n=231) and in-depth interviews (n=9) of individuals with a cervix aged 21-65 residing in Lake County, Indiana. Outcome variables focused on cervical cancer knowledge, willingness to adopt self-sampling, and willingness to adopt HPV rapid testing. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages. A cervical cancer knowledge score was computed from 7 questions. Scores below the mean 3.62 were labeled ‘low’ while higher scores were ‘high’. We also examined associations between demographic and outcome variables. Quantitative analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Qualitative analysis was conducted using NVIVO software to thematically analyze interviews using deductive and inductive coding techniques. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Majority of participants identified as Hispanic (58%), aged 31 or older (58%). While 80.5% reported being screened for cervical cancer, only 44.6% demonstrated ‘high' cervical cancer knowledge. 89.6% felt screening is important as emphasized in qualitative findings for its preventive value. Over half were willing to take their vaginal swab in clinic (55.8%) and at home (51.9%). However, among the Hispanic/Latinx groups reluctance to adopt self-sampling was notable (56.7% in clinic and 62.7% at home). Qualitative analysis revealed concerns about test accuracy. Willingness to use a hypothetical HPV rapid had higher acceptance (69.7%), with 52.2% in the Hispanic/Latinx group. Qualitative findings highlight benefits like increased screening access, comfort, and convenience offered by an HPV rapid test. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Hispanic/Latinx women in the sample were less willing to adopt cervical cancer screening methods such as self-sampling and rapid testing compared to non-Hispanic whites. Despite being considered beneficial for testing among vulnerable populations, our study found limited acceptance from these populations for various reasons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/目标:宫颈癌筛查中存在明显的差异。本研究的目的是调查印第安纳州莱克县西班牙裔妇女对宫颈癌筛查的知识、筛查实践、态度,以及采用自我采样和宫颈癌 HPV 快速检测等筛查创新方法的意愿。方法/研究人群:这项混合方法研究包括在线横截面调查(231 人)和深度访谈(9 人),调查对象是居住在印第安纳州莱克县的 21-65 岁有宫颈的人。结果变量主要包括宫颈癌知识、采用自我采样的意愿以及采用 HPV 快速检测的意愿。描述性统计包括频率和百分比。根据 7 个问题计算出宫颈癌知识得分。得分低于平均值 3.62 的为 "低",得分较高的为 "高"。我们还研究了人口统计学变量与结果变量之间的关联。定量分析使用 SPSS 软件进行。定性分析使用 NVIVO 软件,利用演绎和归纳编码技术对访谈进行专题分析。结果/预期结果:大多数参与者自称是西班牙裔(58%),年龄在 31 岁或以上(58%)。80.5%的人表示接受过宫颈癌筛查,但只有 44.6%的人对宫颈癌有 "高度 "了解。89.6% 的人认为筛查很重要,定性调查结果强调了筛查的预防价值。一半以上的人愿意在诊所(55.8%)和家里(51.9%)做阴道拭子检查。然而,在西班牙裔/拉丁裔群体中,不愿采用自我采样的比例明显偏高(在诊所为 56.7%,在家中为 62.7%)。定性分析显示了对检测准确性的担忧。愿意使用假定的 HPV 快速检测的接受度较高(69.7%),其中西班牙裔/拉丁裔群体的接受度为 52.2%。定性分析结果强调了 HPV 快速检测带来的好处,如增加筛查机会、舒适度和便利性。讨论/意义:与非西班牙裔白人相比,样本中的西班牙裔/拉丁裔妇女不太愿意采用自我采样和快速检测等宫颈癌筛查方法。尽管在弱势群体中进行检测被认为是有益的,但我们的研究发现,由于各种原因,这些人群对这种方法的接受程度有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
206 Cervical Cancer Disparities: Knowledge, Screening and Willingness to adopt testing modalities among Hispanic/Latinx Women in Lake County, Indiana
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There are notable disparities in cervical cancer screening. Theobjective of this study was to examine knowledge, screening practices, attitudes towards cervical cancer screening, and willingness to adopt screening innovations such as self-sampling and HPV rapid testing for cervical cancer among Hispanic women in Lake County, Indiana. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This mixed-methods study encompassed an online cross-sectional survey (n=231) and in-depth interviews (n=9) of individuals with a cervix aged 21-65 residing in Lake County, Indiana. Outcome variables focused on cervical cancer knowledge, willingness to adopt self-sampling, and willingness to adopt HPV rapid testing. Descriptive statistics included frequencies and percentages. A cervical cancer knowledge score was computed from 7 questions. Scores below the mean 3.62 were labeled ‘low’ while higher scores were ‘high’. We also examined associations between demographic and outcome variables. Quantitative analysis was conducted using SPSS software. Qualitative analysis was conducted using NVIVO software to thematically analyze interviews using deductive and inductive coding techniques. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Majority of participants identified as Hispanic (58%), aged 31 or older (58%). While 80.5% reported being screened for cervical cancer, only 44.6% demonstrated ‘high' cervical cancer knowledge. 89.6% felt screening is important as emphasized in qualitative findings for its preventive value. Over half were willing to take their vaginal swab in clinic (55.8%) and at home (51.9%). However, among the Hispanic/Latinx groups reluctance to adopt self-sampling was notable (56.7% in clinic and 62.7% at home). Qualitative analysis revealed concerns about test accuracy. Willingness to use a hypothetical HPV rapid had higher acceptance (69.7%), with 52.2% in the Hispanic/Latinx group. Qualitative findings highlight benefits like increased screening access, comfort, and convenience offered by an HPV rapid test. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Hispanic/Latinx women in the sample were less willing to adopt cervical cancer screening methods such as self-sampling and rapid testing compared to non-Hispanic whites. Despite being considered beneficial for testing among vulnerable populations, our study found limited acceptance from these populations for various reasons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信