谁来管理公民社会在全球治理中的参与和发言权？国际组织 "开放 "研究中的实践理论、反思性和权力

IF 1.7 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Global Society Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.1080/13600826.2024.2334731

Anna Holzscheiter, Leonie Holthaus

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇总结性的思考中，我们珍视特刊对民间社会组织（CSO）之间权力不对称如何影响它们与国际组织（IOs）关系的关注，以及对国际组织与民间社会组织之间权力不对称如何影响它们与国际组织（IOs）关系的关注。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Who Governs Access and Voice of Civil Society in Global Governance? Practice Theory, Reflexivity and Power in the Study of International Organisations’ “Opening Up”

In this concluding reflection, we value the special issue’s focus on how power asymmetries among civil society organisations (CSOs) affect their relations with international organisations (IOs) and...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Global Society INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Global Society covers the new agenda in global and international relations and encourages innovative approaches to the study of global and international issues from a range of disciplines. It promotes the analysis of transactions at multiple levels, and in particular, the way in which these transactions blur the distinction between the sub-national, national, transnational, international and global levels. An ever integrating global society raises a number of issues for global and international relations which do not fit comfortably within established "Paradigms" Among these are the international and global consequences of nationalism and struggles for identity, migration, racism, religious fundamentalism, terrorism and criminal activities.