基于 ADAM 的方法揭示选定欧洲国家的创业生态系统

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Gabrijela Popovic, Aleksandra Fedajev, Petar Mitic, Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene
{"title":"基于 ADAM 的方法揭示选定欧洲国家的创业生态系统","authors":"Gabrijela Popovic, Aleksandra Fedajev, Petar Mitic, Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene","doi":"10.1108/md-12-2023-2420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to integrate the resource-based view (RBV) with other theories that consider external factors necessary to respond successfully to dynamic and uncertain entrepreneurial business conditions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The paper introduces an multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, utilizing the axial-distance-based aggregated measurement (ADAM) method with weights determined by the preference selection index (PSI) method, to rank eight European countries based on the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) data. Additionally, the paper extends the existing entrepreneurial ecosystem taxonomy (EET), offering an additional classification.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The performed analysis emphasizes the importance and necessity of involving different dimensions of EE in assessing the countries' entrepreneurship performance, which facilitates creating adequate policy measures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The crucial limitations are assessments based only on the GEM data from a particular period, possibly leading to a certain bias. Future research should involve data from various resources to increase the results' reliability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The ranking results and country classification obtained using the ADAM-based approach and two distinct taxonomies served as the basis for formulating tailored policy recommendations, aiming to formulate tailored policy implications for increasing the number of new entrepreneurs and improving innovativeness, sustainability and internationalization of existing entrepreneurs for each group of countries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":18046,"journal":{"name":"Management Decision","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ADAM-based approach to unveiling entrepreneurial ecosystems in selected European countries\",\"authors\":\"Gabrijela Popovic, Aleksandra Fedajev, Petar Mitic, Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/md-12-2023-2420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to integrate the resource-based view (RBV) with other theories that consider external factors necessary to respond successfully to dynamic and uncertain entrepreneurial business conditions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The paper introduces an multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, utilizing the axial-distance-based aggregated measurement (ADAM) method with weights determined by the preference selection index (PSI) method, to rank eight European countries based on the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) data. Additionally, the paper extends the existing entrepreneurial ecosystem taxonomy (EET), offering an additional classification.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The performed analysis emphasizes the importance and necessity of involving different dimensions of EE in assessing the countries' entrepreneurship performance, which facilitates creating adequate policy measures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The crucial limitations are assessments based only on the GEM data from a particular period, possibly leading to a certain bias. Future research should involve data from various resources to increase the results' reliability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The ranking results and country classification obtained using the ADAM-based approach and two distinct taxonomies served as the basis for formulating tailored policy recommendations, aiming to formulate tailored policy implications for increasing the number of new entrepreneurs and improving innovativeness, sustainability and internationalization of existing entrepreneurs for each group of countries.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":18046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Management Decision\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Management Decision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/md-12-2023-2420\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Decision","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/md-12-2023-2420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在将基于资源的观点(RBV)与其他理论结合起来,这些理论考虑了成功应对动态、不确定的创 业经营条件所需的外部因素。本文引入了多标准决策(MCDM)方法,利用基于轴向距离的聚合测量 (ADAM)方法和由偏好选择指数(PSI)方法确定的权重,根据全球创业观察(GEM)数据对八个欧洲 国家进行排名。此外,本文还扩展了现有的创业生态系统分类法 (EET),提供了一种额外的分类方法。研究结果所做的分析强调了在评估各国创业表现时涉及创业环境不同维度的重要性和必要性,这有助于制定适当的政策措施。研究局限性/意义关键的局限性在于评估仅基于特定时期的 GEM 数据,可能会导致一定的偏差。原创性/价值使用基于 ADAM 的方法和两个不同的分类法得出的排名结果和国家分类是制定有针对性的政策建议的基础,旨在为每组国家制定有针对性的政策影响,以增加新企业家的数量,提高现有企业家的创新能力、可持续性和国际化程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ADAM-based approach to unveiling entrepreneurial ecosystems in selected European countries

Purpose

This study aims to integrate the resource-based view (RBV) with other theories that consider external factors necessary to respond successfully to dynamic and uncertain entrepreneurial business conditions.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper introduces an multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach, utilizing the axial-distance-based aggregated measurement (ADAM) method with weights determined by the preference selection index (PSI) method, to rank eight European countries based on the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) data. Additionally, the paper extends the existing entrepreneurial ecosystem taxonomy (EET), offering an additional classification.

Findings

The performed analysis emphasizes the importance and necessity of involving different dimensions of EE in assessing the countries' entrepreneurship performance, which facilitates creating adequate policy measures.

Research limitations/implications

The crucial limitations are assessments based only on the GEM data from a particular period, possibly leading to a certain bias. Future research should involve data from various resources to increase the results' reliability.

Originality/value

The ranking results and country classification obtained using the ADAM-based approach and two distinct taxonomies served as the basis for formulating tailored policy recommendations, aiming to formulate tailored policy implications for increasing the number of new entrepreneurs and improving innovativeness, sustainability and internationalization of existing entrepreneurs for each group of countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: ■In-depth studies of major issues ■Operations management ■Financial management ■Motivation ■Entrepreneurship ■Problem solving and proactivity ■Serious management argument ■Strategy and policy issues ■Tactics for turning around company crises Management Decision, considered by many to be the best publication in its field, consistently offers thoughtful and provocative insights into current management practice. As such, its high calibre contributions from leading management philosophers and practitioners make it an invaluable resource in the aggressive and demanding trading climate of the Twenty-First Century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信