Margaret Goodrich MD, Kerry McCabe MD, Jesse Basford MD, Kimberly Bambach MD, Aaron Kraut MD, Jeffrey N. Love MD, MHPE, MSc
{"title":"急诊医学实习生的心理安全和感知到的组织支持","authors":"Margaret Goodrich MD, Kerry McCabe MD, Jesse Basford MD, Kimberly Bambach MD, Aaron Kraut MD, Jeffrey N. Love MD, MHPE, MSc","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a key focus of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. It impacts knowledge acquisition and professional development. A previous single-center study evaluated the psychological safety and perceived organizational support of the CLE across different specialties. Building on this work, we explored and evaluated psychological safety and perceived organizational support across multiple heterogeneous emergency medicine (EM) residencies to identify trends and factors affecting perceptions of the CLE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS) and Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), residents from seven U.S. EM residencies were surveyed using REDCap software from September through November 2021, with 300 potential respondents. As an adjunct to these surveys, three open-ended questions were included regarding features of their learning environments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 137 out of 300 residents completed the survey. The overall response rate was 45.7%. There was a variable response rate across programs (26.0%–96.7%). Pooled results demonstrate an overall positive perception of CLEs, based on positive mean responses (i.e., “Members of my department are able to bring up problems and tough issue” had a mean of 4.2 on a 5-point Likert scale). Open responses identified teaching, collegiality, and support from program leadership as supportive features of the CLE. Confrontational interdisciplinary communication, a sense of being devalued, and off-service rotations were identified as threats or areas for improvement to the CLE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PSS and SPOS scores were generally positive in this multi-institution study, consistent with the prior single-institution study indicating that EM is often considered psychologically safe and supportive. EM training programs can consider using the PSS/SPOS to audit their own programs to identify areas for improvement and foster supportive features already in place.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological safety and perceived organizational support in emergency medicine residencies\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Goodrich MD, Kerry McCabe MD, Jesse Basford MD, Kimberly Bambach MD, Aaron Kraut MD, Jeffrey N. Love MD, MHPE, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a key focus of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. It impacts knowledge acquisition and professional development. A previous single-center study evaluated the psychological safety and perceived organizational support of the CLE across different specialties. Building on this work, we explored and evaluated psychological safety and perceived organizational support across multiple heterogeneous emergency medicine (EM) residencies to identify trends and factors affecting perceptions of the CLE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS) and Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), residents from seven U.S. EM residencies were surveyed using REDCap software from September through November 2021, with 300 potential respondents. As an adjunct to these surveys, three open-ended questions were included regarding features of their learning environments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 137 out of 300 residents completed the survey. The overall response rate was 45.7%. There was a variable response rate across programs (26.0%–96.7%). Pooled results demonstrate an overall positive perception of CLEs, based on positive mean responses (i.e., “Members of my department are able to bring up problems and tough issue” had a mean of 4.2 on a 5-point Likert scale). Open responses identified teaching, collegiality, and support from program leadership as supportive features of the CLE. Confrontational interdisciplinary communication, a sense of being devalued, and off-service rotations were identified as threats or areas for improvement to the CLE.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>PSS and SPOS scores were generally positive in this multi-institution study, consistent with the prior single-institution study indicating that EM is often considered psychologically safe and supportive. EM training programs can consider using the PSS/SPOS to audit their own programs to identify areas for improvement and foster supportive features already in place.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychological safety and perceived organizational support in emergency medicine residencies
Background
The clinical learning environment (CLE) is a key focus of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. It impacts knowledge acquisition and professional development. A previous single-center study evaluated the psychological safety and perceived organizational support of the CLE across different specialties. Building on this work, we explored and evaluated psychological safety and perceived organizational support across multiple heterogeneous emergency medicine (EM) residencies to identify trends and factors affecting perceptions of the CLE.
Methods
Using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS) and Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), residents from seven U.S. EM residencies were surveyed using REDCap software from September through November 2021, with 300 potential respondents. As an adjunct to these surveys, three open-ended questions were included regarding features of their learning environments.
Results
A total of 137 out of 300 residents completed the survey. The overall response rate was 45.7%. There was a variable response rate across programs (26.0%–96.7%). Pooled results demonstrate an overall positive perception of CLEs, based on positive mean responses (i.e., “Members of my department are able to bring up problems and tough issue” had a mean of 4.2 on a 5-point Likert scale). Open responses identified teaching, collegiality, and support from program leadership as supportive features of the CLE. Confrontational interdisciplinary communication, a sense of being devalued, and off-service rotations were identified as threats or areas for improvement to the CLE.
Conclusions
PSS and SPOS scores were generally positive in this multi-institution study, consistent with the prior single-institution study indicating that EM is often considered psychologically safe and supportive. EM training programs can consider using the PSS/SPOS to audit their own programs to identify areas for improvement and foster supportive features already in place.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
