车载中央控制界面的触觉反馈对驾驶员情绪的影响:触摸屏与物理按钮的比较研究

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Faren Huo, Tai Wang, Fei Fang, Cong Sun
{"title":"车载中央控制界面的触觉反馈对驾驶员情绪的影响:触摸屏与物理按钮的比较研究","authors":"Faren Huo,&nbsp;Tai Wang,&nbsp;Fei Fang,&nbsp;Cong Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Touchscreen in-vehicle central control interfaces are rapidly replacing traditional physical buttons. However, the differences in the effects of tactile feedback between touchscreens and physical buttons on driver emotions are unclear. This study used a simulated driving experiment to investigate the effects of tactile feedback mode and intensity on driver emotion using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM). The results showed that tactile feedback mode, intensity, and difficulty of non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs) significantly affected drivers' emotional states. Touchscreen tactile feedback elicited a more positive emotional state than physical button tactile feedback. The intensity of touchscreen tactile feedback is positively correlated with driver emotional valence. However, higher-intensity physical button feedback decreases driver emotional valence, particularly when drivers are engaged in complex NDRTs, and the difference due to feedback intensity is insignificant. The study's results could help automakers intervene by designing tactile feedback to enhance the emotional experience of the driver's in-vehicle interaction interface.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000428/pdfft?md5=ebaaf966eb6d2450ccaf1356b5d093c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0169814124000428-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of tactile feedback in In-vehicle central control interfaces on driver emotions: A comparative study of touchscreens and physical buttons\",\"authors\":\"Faren Huo,&nbsp;Tai Wang,&nbsp;Fei Fang,&nbsp;Cong Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Touchscreen in-vehicle central control interfaces are rapidly replacing traditional physical buttons. However, the differences in the effects of tactile feedback between touchscreens and physical buttons on driver emotions are unclear. This study used a simulated driving experiment to investigate the effects of tactile feedback mode and intensity on driver emotion using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM). The results showed that tactile feedback mode, intensity, and difficulty of non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs) significantly affected drivers' emotional states. Touchscreen tactile feedback elicited a more positive emotional state than physical button tactile feedback. The intensity of touchscreen tactile feedback is positively correlated with driver emotional valence. However, higher-intensity physical button feedback decreases driver emotional valence, particularly when drivers are engaged in complex NDRTs, and the difference due to feedback intensity is insignificant. The study's results could help automakers intervene by designing tactile feedback to enhance the emotional experience of the driver's in-vehicle interaction interface.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000428/pdfft?md5=ebaaf966eb6d2450ccaf1356b5d093c6&pid=1-s2.0-S0169814124000428-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000428\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814124000428","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

触摸屏车载中央控制界面正在迅速取代传统的物理按钮。然而,触摸屏和物理按钮之间的触觉反馈对驾驶员情绪的影响差异尚不清楚。本研究通过模拟驾驶实验,使用自我评估人体模型(SAM)研究了触觉反馈模式和强度对驾驶员情绪的影响。结果表明,非驾驶相关任务(NDRTs)的触觉反馈模式、强度和难度会显著影响驾驶员的情绪状态。与物理按钮触觉反馈相比,触摸屏触觉反馈引起的情绪状态更为积极。触摸屏触觉反馈的强度与驾驶员的情绪价值正相关。然而,强度较高的物理按钮反馈会降低驾驶员的情绪价值,尤其是当驾驶员进行复杂的非驾驶员动态疲劳测试时,反馈强度造成的差异并不显著。研究结果有助于汽车制造商通过设计触觉反馈进行干预,以增强驾驶员在车载交互界面上的情感体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of tactile feedback in In-vehicle central control interfaces on driver emotions: A comparative study of touchscreens and physical buttons

Touchscreen in-vehicle central control interfaces are rapidly replacing traditional physical buttons. However, the differences in the effects of tactile feedback between touchscreens and physical buttons on driver emotions are unclear. This study used a simulated driving experiment to investigate the effects of tactile feedback mode and intensity on driver emotion using the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM). The results showed that tactile feedback mode, intensity, and difficulty of non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs) significantly affected drivers' emotional states. Touchscreen tactile feedback elicited a more positive emotional state than physical button tactile feedback. The intensity of touchscreen tactile feedback is positively correlated with driver emotional valence. However, higher-intensity physical button feedback decreases driver emotional valence, particularly when drivers are engaged in complex NDRTs, and the difference due to feedback intensity is insignificant. The study's results could help automakers intervene by designing tactile feedback to enhance the emotional experience of the driver's in-vehicle interaction interface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信