机械、金属和非金属矿物产品制造业事故率与根据 KRAS 分类的危险因素改善率之间的关系分析

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ho Houng Yu , Doo Hyun Kim , Sung Chul Kim
{"title":"机械、金属和非金属矿物产品制造业事故率与根据 KRAS 分类的危险因素改善率之间的关系分析","authors":"Ho Houng Yu ,&nbsp;Doo Hyun Kim ,&nbsp;Sung Chul Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, 76.6% of businesses in South Korea that are required to appoint safety managers have outsourced their safety management tasks to specialized safety management institutions. As a result, the role of these institutions is crucial. However, these institutions lack standardized inspection items for workplaces, and there are no specific regulations that enforce the improvement of identified risk factors in the submitted inspection reports. This leads to a low improvement rate and a lack of reduction in the accident rate. This study focuses on 10 businesses in the machinery, metallic, and non-metallic mineral products manufacturing industry in the southern region of Gyeonggi Province, South Korea. Over a period of three years, the contents of inspection reports submitted by these businesses were classified into six categories: mechanical factors, electrical factors, chemical(substance) factors, biological factors, task-specific factors, and work environment factors, according to the Korea risk assessment system(KRAS) classification. Regression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted to find out the relationship between the improvement rate and the accident rate. The results of the regression analysis confirmed that the improvement rate of risk factors provided by specialized safety management institutions significantly affects the accident rate in the workplace. The correlation analysis results indicate a significant correlation between the improvement rates and accident rates of the five factors excluding biological factors for which no inspection items were identified. Based on these findings, the study identified inspection items within the reports that had a low improvement rate and were repeatedly pointed out. Additionally, priority improvement items were derived based on the industry's characteristics. This study proposes checklists that can be utilized for safety inspections in the machinery, metallic, and non-metallic mineral products manufacturing industry. It is expected that by utilizing these safety inspection checklists, the accident rate in these workplaces can be reduced.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis on the relationship between accident ratio of machinery, metal, and non-metal mineral product manufacturing and improvement ratio of risk factors classified according to the KRAS\",\"authors\":\"Ho Houng Yu ,&nbsp;Doo Hyun Kim ,&nbsp;Sung Chul Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Currently, 76.6% of businesses in South Korea that are required to appoint safety managers have outsourced their safety management tasks to specialized safety management institutions. As a result, the role of these institutions is crucial. However, these institutions lack standardized inspection items for workplaces, and there are no specific regulations that enforce the improvement of identified risk factors in the submitted inspection reports. This leads to a low improvement rate and a lack of reduction in the accident rate. This study focuses on 10 businesses in the machinery, metallic, and non-metallic mineral products manufacturing industry in the southern region of Gyeonggi Province, South Korea. Over a period of three years, the contents of inspection reports submitted by these businesses were classified into six categories: mechanical factors, electrical factors, chemical(substance) factors, biological factors, task-specific factors, and work environment factors, according to the Korea risk assessment system(KRAS) classification. Regression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted to find out the relationship between the improvement rate and the accident rate. The results of the regression analysis confirmed that the improvement rate of risk factors provided by specialized safety management institutions significantly affects the accident rate in the workplace. The correlation analysis results indicate a significant correlation between the improvement rates and accident rates of the five factors excluding biological factors for which no inspection items were identified. Based on these findings, the study identified inspection items within the reports that had a low improvement rate and were repeatedly pointed out. Additionally, priority improvement items were derived based on the industry's characteristics. This study proposes checklists that can be utilized for safety inspections in the machinery, metallic, and non-metallic mineral products manufacturing industry. It is expected that by utilizing these safety inspection checklists, the accident rate in these workplaces can be reduced.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095042302400069X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095042302400069X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,韩国 76.6%必须任命安全管理人员的企业已将安全管理任务外包给专门的安全管理机构。因此,这些机构的作用至关重要。然而,这些机构缺乏针对工作场所的标准化检查项目,也没有具体的规定来强制要求在提交的检查报告中对发现的危险因素进行改进。这导致改进率低,事故率也没有降低。本研究以韩国京畿道南部地区机械、金属和非金属矿物制品制造业的 10 家企业为研究对象。根据韩国风险评估系统(KRAS)的分类,将这些企业在三年内提交的检查报告内容分为六类:机械因素、电气因素、化学(物质)因素、生物因素、特定任务因素和工作环境因素。为了找出改善率与事故率之间的关系,进行了回归分析和皮尔逊相关分析。回归分析结果证实,专业安全管理机构提供的风险因素改善率对工作场所事故率有显著影响。相关性分析结果表明,除生物因素外的五个因素的改善率和事故率之间存在明显的相关性,因为生物因素没有确定检查项目。根据这些结果,研究确定了报告中改进率较低且被反复指出的检查项目。此外,还根据行业特点得出了优先改进项目。本研究提出了可用于机械、金属和非金属矿物产品制造业安全检查的清单。通过使用这些安全检查核对表,有望降低这些工作场所的事故率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis on the relationship between accident ratio of machinery, metal, and non-metal mineral product manufacturing and improvement ratio of risk factors classified according to the KRAS

Currently, 76.6% of businesses in South Korea that are required to appoint safety managers have outsourced their safety management tasks to specialized safety management institutions. As a result, the role of these institutions is crucial. However, these institutions lack standardized inspection items for workplaces, and there are no specific regulations that enforce the improvement of identified risk factors in the submitted inspection reports. This leads to a low improvement rate and a lack of reduction in the accident rate. This study focuses on 10 businesses in the machinery, metallic, and non-metallic mineral products manufacturing industry in the southern region of Gyeonggi Province, South Korea. Over a period of three years, the contents of inspection reports submitted by these businesses were classified into six categories: mechanical factors, electrical factors, chemical(substance) factors, biological factors, task-specific factors, and work environment factors, according to the Korea risk assessment system(KRAS) classification. Regression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were conducted to find out the relationship between the improvement rate and the accident rate. The results of the regression analysis confirmed that the improvement rate of risk factors provided by specialized safety management institutions significantly affects the accident rate in the workplace. The correlation analysis results indicate a significant correlation between the improvement rates and accident rates of the five factors excluding biological factors for which no inspection items were identified. Based on these findings, the study identified inspection items within the reports that had a low improvement rate and were repeatedly pointed out. Additionally, priority improvement items were derived based on the industry's characteristics. This study proposes checklists that can be utilized for safety inspections in the machinery, metallic, and non-metallic mineral products manufacturing industry. It is expected that by utilizing these safety inspection checklists, the accident rate in these workplaces can be reduced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信