生产性用电的概念和前因后果:系统文献综述

IF 5.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Sylvia M. Aarakit , Joseph M. Ntayi , Francis Wasswa , Faisal Buyinza , Muyiwa S. Adaramola
{"title":"生产性用电的概念和前因后果:系统文献综述","authors":"Sylvia M. Aarakit ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Ntayi ,&nbsp;Francis Wasswa ,&nbsp;Faisal Buyinza ,&nbsp;Muyiwa S. Adaramola","doi":"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Productive use of energy is recognized as a pathway to economic and sustainable development. Indeed, there has been deliberate effort to promote productive use of energy, particularly, electricity by policy makers and international organizations. However, limited understanding of what constitutes productive use and factors that potentially influence uptake of productive uses at micro level continue to undermine existing efforts to promote productive use of energy in developing countries. Using a systematic literature review approach, a total of 54 out of 997 articles were selected following the criteria for inclusion and exclusion for further analysis. We find that majority of studies define productive use of electricity as application of electricity energy services to activities that generate income or enhance productivity. Regarding conceptualization, we found that productive use of electricity is conceptualized along three dimensions, which are (1) improved performance of existing income generating activities, (2) use of modern electrical productive use appliances and (3) creation of new enterprises and job opportunities after electrification. Furthermore, the review found that majority of studies identify electricity related factors as important drivers of productive use of electricity. However, these should be bundled with other non-electricity related variables including financial, technological, human capabilities, institutional, infrastructural, social, demographic characteristics. The paper has also identified various research gaps that may inform future studies in productive use of electricity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34618,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100747"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000272/pdfft?md5=54c1ed020ff60a6383797170b6f6b673&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000272-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualization and antecedents of productive use of electricity: A systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia M. Aarakit ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Ntayi ,&nbsp;Francis Wasswa ,&nbsp;Faisal Buyinza ,&nbsp;Muyiwa S. Adaramola\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clet.2024.100747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Productive use of energy is recognized as a pathway to economic and sustainable development. Indeed, there has been deliberate effort to promote productive use of energy, particularly, electricity by policy makers and international organizations. However, limited understanding of what constitutes productive use and factors that potentially influence uptake of productive uses at micro level continue to undermine existing efforts to promote productive use of energy in developing countries. Using a systematic literature review approach, a total of 54 out of 997 articles were selected following the criteria for inclusion and exclusion for further analysis. We find that majority of studies define productive use of electricity as application of electricity energy services to activities that generate income or enhance productivity. Regarding conceptualization, we found that productive use of electricity is conceptualized along three dimensions, which are (1) improved performance of existing income generating activities, (2) use of modern electrical productive use appliances and (3) creation of new enterprises and job opportunities after electrification. Furthermore, the review found that majority of studies identify electricity related factors as important drivers of productive use of electricity. However, these should be bundled with other non-electricity related variables including financial, technological, human capabilities, institutional, infrastructural, social, demographic characteristics. The paper has also identified various research gaps that may inform future studies in productive use of electricity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000272/pdfft?md5=54c1ed020ff60a6383797170b6f6b673&pid=1-s2.0-S2666790824000272-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790824000272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源的生产性利用被认为是经济和可持续发展的必由之路。事实上,政策制定者和国际组织一直在有意识地努力促进能源的生产性利用,特别是电力的生产性利用。然而,由于对什么是生产性利用以及在微观层面可能影响生产性利用的因素了解有限,发展中国家促进能源生产性利用的现有努力继续受到削弱。我们采用系统性文献综述方法,按照纳入和排除标准,从 997 篇文章中选出 54 篇进行进一步分析。我们发现,大多数研究将电力的生产性利用定义为将电力能源服务应用于创收或提高生产力的活动。在概念化方面,我们发现生产性用电的概念有三个方面,即(1)改善现有创收活动的绩效;(2)使用现代生产性用电设备;(3)电气化后创造新的企业和就业机会。此外,审查还发现,大多数研究将与电力相关的因素视为生产性用电的重要驱动因素。然而,这些因素应与其他非电力相关变量捆绑在一起,包括金融、技术、人的能力、机构、基础设施、社会和人口特征。本文还确定了各种研究缺口,可为今后的生产性用电研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptualization and antecedents of productive use of electricity: A systematic literature review

Productive use of energy is recognized as a pathway to economic and sustainable development. Indeed, there has been deliberate effort to promote productive use of energy, particularly, electricity by policy makers and international organizations. However, limited understanding of what constitutes productive use and factors that potentially influence uptake of productive uses at micro level continue to undermine existing efforts to promote productive use of energy in developing countries. Using a systematic literature review approach, a total of 54 out of 997 articles were selected following the criteria for inclusion and exclusion for further analysis. We find that majority of studies define productive use of electricity as application of electricity energy services to activities that generate income or enhance productivity. Regarding conceptualization, we found that productive use of electricity is conceptualized along three dimensions, which are (1) improved performance of existing income generating activities, (2) use of modern electrical productive use appliances and (3) creation of new enterprises and job opportunities after electrification. Furthermore, the review found that majority of studies identify electricity related factors as important drivers of productive use of electricity. However, these should be bundled with other non-electricity related variables including financial, technological, human capabilities, institutional, infrastructural, social, demographic characteristics. The paper has also identified various research gaps that may inform future studies in productive use of electricity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleaner Engineering and Technology
Cleaner Engineering and Technology Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信