使用选择性流入性能工作流程推导产气井中的未知下层压力

S. Rehman, W. H. Mirza, I. B. Espinoza, U. Farooq
{"title":"使用选择性流入性能工作流程推导产气井中的未知下层压力","authors":"S. Rehman, W. H. Mirza, I. B. Espinoza, U. Farooq","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23216-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The accurate measurement of sub-zone pressures is crucial for monitoring the performance of reservoirs in gas fields. However, this can be challenging due to the commingled flow of multiple reservoirs and sub-zones within a single well. In this study, we evaluated the use of Production Logging (PLT) and Selective Inflow Performance (SIP) workflows for computing sub-layer pressure in carbonate reservoirs in Pakistan.\n The study was conducted on carbonate reservoirs located in Pakistan. The usual wells are vertical and have numerous perforations, resulting in combined production across multiple reservoirs and sub-zones. To determine the pressure of a specific sublayer, Production Logging (PLT) was carried out to collect data at various choke sizes. The data was then analyzed through Selective Inflow Performance (SIP) workflow. The Rawlins and Schell-Hardt equation was used to plot the relationship between flow rate and pressure, enabling analysts to match the trendline with the acquired data points.\n The proposed analysis revealed that at least three different chokes should be tested during PLT logging to ensure accurate results. In addition, for accurate analysis it is preferred that a single-phase fluid is flowing at high flow rates, to be able to detect contrasts between inflows from different zones. In Case-1 SIP workflows were applied on two independent reservoirs with multiple sub-zone entries and found that Reservoir-1 had a current pressure of around 1480psi, whereas Reservoir-2, which was more depleted, contributing more than 80% to production had a current pressure of around 1050psi. Shutting down the wells showed an estimated crossflow of 0.43 MMSCF/D from one reservoir to another. The results demonstrated a good relationship between PLT estimated flow rates and pressures across all producing sub-zones. In Case-2, it was observed that the highest contributing layer on every choke size became a thief zone in shut-in conditions. Such kind of a reservoir that contain mulitple isolated stringers that are commingled together in the well make it challenging for reservoir management.\n The successful application of SIP workflow allows to perform pressure time-lapse monitoring and adjust the dynamic model accordingly for future reservoir development. This study highlights the importance of periodically measuring sub-zone pressures for effective reservoir performance monitoring in gas fields.","PeriodicalId":518539,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deriving the Unknown Sublayer's Pressure in Producing Gas Wells Using the Selective Inflow Performance Workflow\",\"authors\":\"S. Rehman, W. H. Mirza, I. B. Espinoza, U. Farooq\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-23216-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The accurate measurement of sub-zone pressures is crucial for monitoring the performance of reservoirs in gas fields. However, this can be challenging due to the commingled flow of multiple reservoirs and sub-zones within a single well. In this study, we evaluated the use of Production Logging (PLT) and Selective Inflow Performance (SIP) workflows for computing sub-layer pressure in carbonate reservoirs in Pakistan.\\n The study was conducted on carbonate reservoirs located in Pakistan. The usual wells are vertical and have numerous perforations, resulting in combined production across multiple reservoirs and sub-zones. To determine the pressure of a specific sublayer, Production Logging (PLT) was carried out to collect data at various choke sizes. The data was then analyzed through Selective Inflow Performance (SIP) workflow. The Rawlins and Schell-Hardt equation was used to plot the relationship between flow rate and pressure, enabling analysts to match the trendline with the acquired data points.\\n The proposed analysis revealed that at least three different chokes should be tested during PLT logging to ensure accurate results. In addition, for accurate analysis it is preferred that a single-phase fluid is flowing at high flow rates, to be able to detect contrasts between inflows from different zones. In Case-1 SIP workflows were applied on two independent reservoirs with multiple sub-zone entries and found that Reservoir-1 had a current pressure of around 1480psi, whereas Reservoir-2, which was more depleted, contributing more than 80% to production had a current pressure of around 1050psi. Shutting down the wells showed an estimated crossflow of 0.43 MMSCF/D from one reservoir to another. The results demonstrated a good relationship between PLT estimated flow rates and pressures across all producing sub-zones. In Case-2, it was observed that the highest contributing layer on every choke size became a thief zone in shut-in conditions. Such kind of a reservoir that contain mulitple isolated stringers that are commingled together in the well make it challenging for reservoir management.\\n The successful application of SIP workflow allows to perform pressure time-lapse monitoring and adjust the dynamic model accordingly for future reservoir development. This study highlights the importance of periodically measuring sub-zone pressures for effective reservoir performance monitoring in gas fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":518539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23216-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, February 14, 2024","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23216-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精确测量分区压力对于监测气田储层的性能至关重要。然而,由于单井内多个储层和子区的混合流动,这可能具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们评估了使用生产测井(PLT)和选择性流入性能(SIP)工作流计算巴基斯坦碳酸盐岩储层的次层压力的情况。研究针对巴基斯坦的碳酸盐岩储层。通常的油井都是垂直的,并且有许多射孔,从而导致多个储层和子区的联合生产。为了确定特定子层的压力,进行了生产测井(PLT),以收集不同阻塞尺寸下的数据。然后通过选择性流入性能(SIP)工作流程对数据进行分析。采用 Rawlins 和 Schell-Hardt 方程绘制流量与压力之间的关系图,使分析人员能够将趋势线与采集的数据点相匹配。建议的分析表明,在 PLT 测井过程中至少应测试三种不同的扼流圈,以确保结果准确。此外,为了准确分析,最好是单相流体以高流速流动,以便能够检测到不同区域流入流体之间的对比。在案例-1 中,SIP 工作流程被应用于两个具有多个子区入口的独立储油层,结果发现储油层-1 的当前压力约为 1480psi,而储油层-2(枯竭程度较高,产量占 80% 以上)的当前压力约为 1050psi。关闭油井后,从一个储油层到另一个储油层的跨流估计为 0.43 MMSCF/D。结果表明,PLT 估计流量与所有生产分区的压力之间关系良好。在案例-2 中,我们观察到,在关井条件下,每个扼流圈尺寸上的最高出油层都成为盗油区。这种油藏包含多个孤立的层系,这些层系在井中混杂在一起,给油藏管理带来了挑战。SIP 工作流程的成功应用可以进行压力延时监测,并为未来的储层开发调整相应的动态模型。这项研究强调了定期测量分区压力对于有效监测气田储层性能的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deriving the Unknown Sublayer's Pressure in Producing Gas Wells Using the Selective Inflow Performance Workflow
The accurate measurement of sub-zone pressures is crucial for monitoring the performance of reservoirs in gas fields. However, this can be challenging due to the commingled flow of multiple reservoirs and sub-zones within a single well. In this study, we evaluated the use of Production Logging (PLT) and Selective Inflow Performance (SIP) workflows for computing sub-layer pressure in carbonate reservoirs in Pakistan. The study was conducted on carbonate reservoirs located in Pakistan. The usual wells are vertical and have numerous perforations, resulting in combined production across multiple reservoirs and sub-zones. To determine the pressure of a specific sublayer, Production Logging (PLT) was carried out to collect data at various choke sizes. The data was then analyzed through Selective Inflow Performance (SIP) workflow. The Rawlins and Schell-Hardt equation was used to plot the relationship between flow rate and pressure, enabling analysts to match the trendline with the acquired data points. The proposed analysis revealed that at least three different chokes should be tested during PLT logging to ensure accurate results. In addition, for accurate analysis it is preferred that a single-phase fluid is flowing at high flow rates, to be able to detect contrasts between inflows from different zones. In Case-1 SIP workflows were applied on two independent reservoirs with multiple sub-zone entries and found that Reservoir-1 had a current pressure of around 1480psi, whereas Reservoir-2, which was more depleted, contributing more than 80% to production had a current pressure of around 1050psi. Shutting down the wells showed an estimated crossflow of 0.43 MMSCF/D from one reservoir to another. The results demonstrated a good relationship between PLT estimated flow rates and pressures across all producing sub-zones. In Case-2, it was observed that the highest contributing layer on every choke size became a thief zone in shut-in conditions. Such kind of a reservoir that contain mulitple isolated stringers that are commingled together in the well make it challenging for reservoir management. The successful application of SIP workflow allows to perform pressure time-lapse monitoring and adjust the dynamic model accordingly for future reservoir development. This study highlights the importance of periodically measuring sub-zone pressures for effective reservoir performance monitoring in gas fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信