阿拉伯语历史词典》:阿拉伯语历史词典:多哈词典与阿拉伯学院联盟的比较与对比》。

Ahmed M. Abdelfattah
{"title":"阿拉伯语历史词典》:阿拉伯语历史词典:多哈词典与阿拉伯学院联盟的比较与对比》。","authors":"Ahmed M. Abdelfattah","doi":"10.21608/jssa.2024.226548.1531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study deals with the description and analysis of the two historical lexicons, some of which have recently begun to be completed - and work on them is still ongoing - for the historiography of the Arabic language, with a balance between them in content and method. This research follows - by holding that balance - the descriptive approach, using the rules and foundations of the modern lexical industry. The objectives of this balancing study are summed up in standing on the advantages of the two dictionaries, with reference to the points that can be remedied in the upcoming updates on them, and the new projects in this field. This research consists - after the introduction - of a theoretical preface that deals with the limits of the subject of study, which is the historical dictionary, its definitions, and the most important international and Arab attempts to manufacture such a dictionary, ending with the development of stages of the two lexicons under study. This is followed by the applied side of the research. There is a balance between the two lexicons from various aspects, including: the purpose of developing the dictionary, the sources it relied on in collecting its material, how it chooses its lexical units, the treatment of these units, and finally how it is arranged externally and internally. The research ends with presenting the most important findings of the study .","PeriodicalId":250727,"journal":{"name":"مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Historical Dictionary of Arabic: Comparing and Contrasting the Doha Dictionary and the Union of Arab Academies.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed M. Abdelfattah\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/jssa.2024.226548.1531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study deals with the description and analysis of the two historical lexicons, some of which have recently begun to be completed - and work on them is still ongoing - for the historiography of the Arabic language, with a balance between them in content and method. This research follows - by holding that balance - the descriptive approach, using the rules and foundations of the modern lexical industry. The objectives of this balancing study are summed up in standing on the advantages of the two dictionaries, with reference to the points that can be remedied in the upcoming updates on them, and the new projects in this field. This research consists - after the introduction - of a theoretical preface that deals with the limits of the subject of study, which is the historical dictionary, its definitions, and the most important international and Arab attempts to manufacture such a dictionary, ending with the development of stages of the two lexicons under study. This is followed by the applied side of the research. There is a balance between the two lexicons from various aspects, including: the purpose of developing the dictionary, the sources it relied on in collecting its material, how it chooses its lexical units, the treatment of these units, and finally how it is arranged externally and internally. The research ends with presenting the most important findings of the study .\",\"PeriodicalId\":250727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/jssa.2024.226548.1531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"مجلة البحث العلمي في الآداب","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jssa.2024.226548.1531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究涉及对两部历史词典的描述和分析,其中一些词典最近已开始完成--有关它们的工作仍在进行中--用于阿拉伯语历史学,同时在内容和方法上保持平衡。通过保持这种平衡,本研究采用描述性方法,利用现代词汇行业的规则和基础。这项平衡研究的目的在于总结两部词典的优势,并参考即将更新的词典中可以弥补的不足之处,以及该领域的新项目。在引言之后,本研究包括一个理论性前言,涉及研究对象的局限性,即历史词典、其定义、国际上和阿拉伯国家为编纂这样一部词典所做的最重要的尝试,最后是所研究的两部词典的发展阶段。随后是应用方面的研究。这两部词典在各个方面都取得了平衡,包括:编纂词典的目的、收集材料的来源、如何选择词汇单位、如何处理这些单位,最后是如何进行外部和内部编排。研究最后介绍了最重要的研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Historical Dictionary of Arabic: Comparing and Contrasting the Doha Dictionary and the Union of Arab Academies.
This study deals with the description and analysis of the two historical lexicons, some of which have recently begun to be completed - and work on them is still ongoing - for the historiography of the Arabic language, with a balance between them in content and method. This research follows - by holding that balance - the descriptive approach, using the rules and foundations of the modern lexical industry. The objectives of this balancing study are summed up in standing on the advantages of the two dictionaries, with reference to the points that can be remedied in the upcoming updates on them, and the new projects in this field. This research consists - after the introduction - of a theoretical preface that deals with the limits of the subject of study, which is the historical dictionary, its definitions, and the most important international and Arab attempts to manufacture such a dictionary, ending with the development of stages of the two lexicons under study. This is followed by the applied side of the research. There is a balance between the two lexicons from various aspects, including: the purpose of developing the dictionary, the sources it relied on in collecting its material, how it chooses its lexical units, the treatment of these units, and finally how it is arranged externally and internally. The research ends with presenting the most important findings of the study .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信