以社区药房为基础的药物审查服务的支付意愿:私营医疗保险公司的观点

Mohammad Abu Assab, D. Jaber, Fares Albahar, Hamza Alhamad, T. Mukattash, Hebah Al-Mathani, Hanadi Abu Assab
{"title":"以社区药房为基础的药物审查服务的支付意愿:私营医疗保险公司的观点","authors":"Mohammad Abu Assab, D. Jaber, Fares Albahar, Hamza Alhamad, T. Mukattash, Hebah Al-Mathani, Hanadi Abu Assab","doi":"10.18549/pharmpract.2023.4.2863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The medication review service (MRS) is a valuable community pharmacies-based health service to patients, ensuring optimal medication use and reducing medication errors. Nevertheless, it remains limited in scope and empowerment without remuneration for providing the service. Objective: This study aimed to assess private health insurance (PHI) and third-party administration (TPA) firms’ perspectives regarding the MRS offered by community pharmacies in Jordan and the extent of their willingness to pay for this service. Method: The research was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted using a constructed and validated Arabic questionnaire that was distributed electronically to the key health insurance decision-makers (general managers, operational managers, medical network managers, directors, and supervisors) among all the (22) PHI and TPA active firms that are members of the Jordan Insurance Federation (JIF) and licensed under the insurance administration in the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Participants provided their consent electronically before filling out the questionnaire. Results: 50 health insurance decision-makers agreed to participate in this study. 48% partially (42%) or completely (6%) heard about the medication review service. Most respondents (n=35, 70%) believed the medication review service is expected to reduce the cost of medications. Furthermore, they believed the service is expected to reduce the cost of the medical bill by ensuring the medication is not repeated within a short time unless advised by the doctor, checking the exact dosage regimen of each drug, and using alternative medicines at lower cost (74%, 64%, and 60%) of respondents respectively. Half of the respondents were eager to remunerate for the medication review service, with the majority willing to pay less than 10 Jordanian Dinars (JODs) per patient. Conclusion: Although almost half of the PHI and TPA firms’ decision-makers had not heard about the MRS before, achieving eventual cost savings in the reimbursed medication value strongly motivated them to reimburse for the service. Pharmacy and health policymakers are in place to take further steps to empower the service and find common ground with insurance parties to reimburse it for improved medical health insurance services to their beneficiaries with overall cost savings.","PeriodicalId":516653,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Practice","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to pay for community pharmacies-based medication review service: perspectives of private health insurance firms\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Abu Assab, D. Jaber, Fares Albahar, Hamza Alhamad, T. Mukattash, Hebah Al-Mathani, Hanadi Abu Assab\",\"doi\":\"10.18549/pharmpract.2023.4.2863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The medication review service (MRS) is a valuable community pharmacies-based health service to patients, ensuring optimal medication use and reducing medication errors. Nevertheless, it remains limited in scope and empowerment without remuneration for providing the service. Objective: This study aimed to assess private health insurance (PHI) and third-party administration (TPA) firms’ perspectives regarding the MRS offered by community pharmacies in Jordan and the extent of their willingness to pay for this service. Method: The research was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted using a constructed and validated Arabic questionnaire that was distributed electronically to the key health insurance decision-makers (general managers, operational managers, medical network managers, directors, and supervisors) among all the (22) PHI and TPA active firms that are members of the Jordan Insurance Federation (JIF) and licensed under the insurance administration in the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Participants provided their consent electronically before filling out the questionnaire. Results: 50 health insurance decision-makers agreed to participate in this study. 48% partially (42%) or completely (6%) heard about the medication review service. Most respondents (n=35, 70%) believed the medication review service is expected to reduce the cost of medications. Furthermore, they believed the service is expected to reduce the cost of the medical bill by ensuring the medication is not repeated within a short time unless advised by the doctor, checking the exact dosage regimen of each drug, and using alternative medicines at lower cost (74%, 64%, and 60%) of respondents respectively. Half of the respondents were eager to remunerate for the medication review service, with the majority willing to pay less than 10 Jordanian Dinars (JODs) per patient. Conclusion: Although almost half of the PHI and TPA firms’ decision-makers had not heard about the MRS before, achieving eventual cost savings in the reimbursed medication value strongly motivated them to reimburse for the service. Pharmacy and health policymakers are in place to take further steps to empower the service and find common ground with insurance parties to reimburse it for improved medical health insurance services to their beneficiaries with overall cost savings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2023.4.2863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2023.4.2863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药物审查服务(MRS)是以社区药房为基础为患者提供的一项宝贵的医疗服务,可确保最佳用药并减少用药错误。然而,在没有报酬的情况下,这项服务的范围和能力仍然有限。研究目的本研究旨在评估私人医疗保险(PHI)和第三方管理(TPA)公司对约旦社区药房提供的 MRS 的看法,以及他们愿意为这项服务付费的程度。研究方法:该研究是一项观察性横断面研究,使用一份经过构建和验证的阿拉伯语问卷,以电子方式分发给所有(22 家)PHI 和 TPA 公司的主要医疗保险决策者(总经理、运营经理、医疗网络经理、总监和主管),这些公司都是约旦保险联合会(JIF)的成员,并在工业和贸易部的保险管理部门获得许可。参与者在填写问卷前通过电子方式表示同意。结果:50 名医疗保险决策者同意参与本研究。48%的受访者部分(42%)或完全(6%)听说过药物审查服务。大多数受访者(n=35,70%)认为药物审查服务有望降低药物费用。此外,他们还认为该服务可确保除非医生建议,否则不会在短时间内重复用药,检查每种药物的确切剂量方案,以及使用成本较低的替代药物,从而降低医疗费用(分别占 74%、64% 和 60%)。半数受访者愿意为药物审查服务支付报酬,其中大多数人愿意为每位患者支付少于 10 约旦第纳尔(JODs)的费用。结论虽然近一半的私人医疗保险公司和 TPA 公司的决策者以前没有听说过 MRS,但最终在报销的药物价值中实现成本节约,强烈促使他们为该服务报销费用。药房和卫生政策制定者已就位,可采取进一步措施增强该服务的能力,并与保险方达成共识,通过报销该服务为受益人提供更好的医疗健康保险服务,同时节省总体成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Willingness to pay for community pharmacies-based medication review service: perspectives of private health insurance firms
Background: The medication review service (MRS) is a valuable community pharmacies-based health service to patients, ensuring optimal medication use and reducing medication errors. Nevertheless, it remains limited in scope and empowerment without remuneration for providing the service. Objective: This study aimed to assess private health insurance (PHI) and third-party administration (TPA) firms’ perspectives regarding the MRS offered by community pharmacies in Jordan and the extent of their willingness to pay for this service. Method: The research was an observational, cross-sectional study conducted using a constructed and validated Arabic questionnaire that was distributed electronically to the key health insurance decision-makers (general managers, operational managers, medical network managers, directors, and supervisors) among all the (22) PHI and TPA active firms that are members of the Jordan Insurance Federation (JIF) and licensed under the insurance administration in the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Participants provided their consent electronically before filling out the questionnaire. Results: 50 health insurance decision-makers agreed to participate in this study. 48% partially (42%) or completely (6%) heard about the medication review service. Most respondents (n=35, 70%) believed the medication review service is expected to reduce the cost of medications. Furthermore, they believed the service is expected to reduce the cost of the medical bill by ensuring the medication is not repeated within a short time unless advised by the doctor, checking the exact dosage regimen of each drug, and using alternative medicines at lower cost (74%, 64%, and 60%) of respondents respectively. Half of the respondents were eager to remunerate for the medication review service, with the majority willing to pay less than 10 Jordanian Dinars (JODs) per patient. Conclusion: Although almost half of the PHI and TPA firms’ decision-makers had not heard about the MRS before, achieving eventual cost savings in the reimbursed medication value strongly motivated them to reimburse for the service. Pharmacy and health policymakers are in place to take further steps to empower the service and find common ground with insurance parties to reimburse it for improved medical health insurance services to their beneficiaries with overall cost savings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信