{"title":"俄罗斯国家法律继承的不确定性:理论与实践问题","authors":"Saida A. Saybulaeva","doi":"10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the issues of continuity discreteness in the national state-legal system in theoretical interpretation and practical implementation. The article analyzes a counter-demonstrative socio-legal process involving non-acceptance (in some cases, active and demonstrative denial) of the continuity of national political-legal or socio-social provisions. Certain types, features, causes and political and legal consequences of continuity discreteness in the Russian state are identified. The practical manifestations of the rejection of the continuity of law are investigated. The relevance of continuity as the most important element of preserving the original national legal material for subsequent state-legal formations is emphasized, which in practice constitutes the legal self-identification of the domestic society at every stage of the reform of the state-legal system, including the modern period.","PeriodicalId":119687,"journal":{"name":"State power and local self-government","volume":"187 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discreteness of Succession of the Russian State Law: Issues of Theory and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Saida A. Saybulaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the issues of continuity discreteness in the national state-legal system in theoretical interpretation and practical implementation. The article analyzes a counter-demonstrative socio-legal process involving non-acceptance (in some cases, active and demonstrative denial) of the continuity of national political-legal or socio-social provisions. Certain types, features, causes and political and legal consequences of continuity discreteness in the Russian state are identified. The practical manifestations of the rejection of the continuity of law are investigated. The relevance of continuity as the most important element of preserving the original national legal material for subsequent state-legal formations is emphasized, which in practice constitutes the legal self-identification of the domestic society at every stage of the reform of the state-legal system, including the modern period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State power and local self-government\",\"volume\":\"187 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State power and local self-government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State power and local self-government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discreteness of Succession of the Russian State Law: Issues of Theory and Practice
This article discusses the issues of continuity discreteness in the national state-legal system in theoretical interpretation and practical implementation. The article analyzes a counter-demonstrative socio-legal process involving non-acceptance (in some cases, active and demonstrative denial) of the continuity of national political-legal or socio-social provisions. Certain types, features, causes and political and legal consequences of continuity discreteness in the Russian state are identified. The practical manifestations of the rejection of the continuity of law are investigated. The relevance of continuity as the most important element of preserving the original national legal material for subsequent state-legal formations is emphasized, which in practice constitutes the legal self-identification of the domestic society at every stage of the reform of the state-legal system, including the modern period.