俄罗斯国家法律继承的不确定性:理论与实践问题

Saida A. Saybulaeva
{"title":"俄罗斯国家法律继承的不确定性:理论与实践问题","authors":"Saida A. Saybulaeva","doi":"10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the issues of continuity discreteness in the national state-legal system in theoretical interpretation and practical implementation. The article analyzes a counter-demonstrative socio-legal process involving non-acceptance (in some cases, active and demonstrative denial) of the continuity of national political-legal or socio-social provisions. Certain types, features, causes and political and legal consequences of continuity discreteness in the Russian state are identified. The practical manifestations of the rejection of the continuity of law are investigated. The relevance of continuity as the most important element of preserving the original national legal material for subsequent state-legal formations is emphasized, which in practice constitutes the legal self-identification of the domestic society at every stage of the reform of the state-legal system, including the modern period.","PeriodicalId":119687,"journal":{"name":"State power and local self-government","volume":"187 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discreteness of Succession of the Russian State Law: Issues of Theory and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Saida A. Saybulaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the issues of continuity discreteness in the national state-legal system in theoretical interpretation and practical implementation. The article analyzes a counter-demonstrative socio-legal process involving non-acceptance (in some cases, active and demonstrative denial) of the continuity of national political-legal or socio-social provisions. Certain types, features, causes and political and legal consequences of continuity discreteness in the Russian state are identified. The practical manifestations of the rejection of the continuity of law are investigated. The relevance of continuity as the most important element of preserving the original national legal material for subsequent state-legal formations is emphasized, which in practice constitutes the legal self-identification of the domestic society at every stage of the reform of the state-legal system, including the modern period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State power and local self-government\",\"volume\":\"187 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State power and local self-government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State power and local self-government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2024-1-13-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从理论解释和实际执行两个方面讨论了国家法律体系中的连续性不连续问题。文章分析了涉及不接受(在某些情况下是主动和明确否认)国家政治法律或社会社会规定连续性的反示威社会法律进程。确定了俄罗斯国家连续性不统一的某些类型、特征、原因以及政治和法律后果。研究了拒绝法律连续性的实际表现形式。强调了连续性作为为以后的国家法律形式保留原始国家法律材料的最重要因素的相关性,这实际上构成了国内社会在国家法律制度改革的每个阶段(包括现代)的法律自我认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discreteness of Succession of the Russian State Law: Issues of Theory and Practice
This article discusses the issues of continuity discreteness in the national state-legal system in theoretical interpretation and practical implementation. The article analyzes a counter-demonstrative socio-legal process involving non-acceptance (in some cases, active and demonstrative denial) of the continuity of national political-legal or socio-social provisions. Certain types, features, causes and political and legal consequences of continuity discreteness in the Russian state are identified. The practical manifestations of the rejection of the continuity of law are investigated. The relevance of continuity as the most important element of preserving the original national legal material for subsequent state-legal formations is emphasized, which in practice constitutes the legal self-identification of the domestic society at every stage of the reform of the state-legal system, including the modern period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信