以银行抵押贷款为例,比较结构方程模型 PLS 中交互法和多组法的中介效应

Ulfah Maisaroh, Adji Achmad Rinaldo Fernandes, A. Iriany, Mohammad Ohid Ullah
{"title":"以银行抵押贷款为例,比较结构方程模型 PLS 中交互法和多组法的中介效应","authors":"Ulfah Maisaroh, Adji Achmad Rinaldo Fernandes, A. Iriany, Mohammad Ohid Ullah","doi":"10.31764/jtam.v8i1.19919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Structural Equation Modeling is one of multivariate statistical method that used to explain multiple relationships between latent variables simultaneously to test a mediation model to conduct a formal test on mediation effects. Application PLS-SEM for exploratory research and theory development are increasing. Under certain conditions, the effect of exogenous variables on endogenous variable is also strengthened or weakened by moderating variable. In SEM, there are two approaches in analyzing moderation variables, namely the interaction method and the multigroup method. This article aims to compare the mediation effect on interaction approaches and multigroup approaches in Structural Equation Modeling. The data used is the case of timeliness of Bank X mortgage payments. In this article, statistical methods are evaluated to compare indirect effect between groups and examine indirect effect on each group. It was concluded that Collectability Status moderates the indirect relationship between Capital and the Timeliness of Payment through Willingness to Pay. Debtors with current collectability status more strongly effect the Timeliness of Payment than debtors with incurrect collectability status. Theresults of testing indirect effects on moderation with interaction and multigroup approaches are not much different. In the multigroup approach, the bootstrap interval bias is smaller than the bootstrap interval bias in the interaction approach. The Q-square Predictive Relevance value in both methods is quite high, indicating that the model is good. On the Current Collectibility Status group Q^2 is 89.3%, in the incurrect Collectibility Status Q^2 is 84.2%. While in the interaction approach, Q^2 is 70.4%. Researcher recommend a multigroup approach to data that has categorical moderation variables because differences between groups can be directly observed without adding interaction variables in the model.”","PeriodicalId":489521,"journal":{"name":"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)","volume":"53 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Mediation Effects on Interaction and Multigroup Approach in Structural Equation Modeling PLS in Case of Bank Mortgage\",\"authors\":\"Ulfah Maisaroh, Adji Achmad Rinaldo Fernandes, A. Iriany, Mohammad Ohid Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.31764/jtam.v8i1.19919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Structural Equation Modeling is one of multivariate statistical method that used to explain multiple relationships between latent variables simultaneously to test a mediation model to conduct a formal test on mediation effects. Application PLS-SEM for exploratory research and theory development are increasing. Under certain conditions, the effect of exogenous variables on endogenous variable is also strengthened or weakened by moderating variable. In SEM, there are two approaches in analyzing moderation variables, namely the interaction method and the multigroup method. This article aims to compare the mediation effect on interaction approaches and multigroup approaches in Structural Equation Modeling. The data used is the case of timeliness of Bank X mortgage payments. In this article, statistical methods are evaluated to compare indirect effect between groups and examine indirect effect on each group. It was concluded that Collectability Status moderates the indirect relationship between Capital and the Timeliness of Payment through Willingness to Pay. Debtors with current collectability status more strongly effect the Timeliness of Payment than debtors with incurrect collectability status. Theresults of testing indirect effects on moderation with interaction and multigroup approaches are not much different. In the multigroup approach, the bootstrap interval bias is smaller than the bootstrap interval bias in the interaction approach. The Q-square Predictive Relevance value in both methods is quite high, indicating that the model is good. On the Current Collectibility Status group Q^2 is 89.3%, in the incurrect Collectibility Status Q^2 is 84.2%. While in the interaction approach, Q^2 is 70.4%. Researcher recommend a multigroup approach to data that has categorical moderation variables because differences between groups can be directly observed without adding interaction variables in the model.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":489521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i1.19919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika)","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i1.19919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

"结构方程模型"(Structural Equation Modeling)是一种多元统计方法,用于同时解释潜变量之间的多重关系,以检验中介模型,从而对中介效应进行正式检验。PLS-SEM 在探索性研究和理论发展中的应用越来越多。在一定条件下,外生变量对内生变量的影响也会因调节变量而加强或减弱。在 SEM 中,有两种分析调节变量的方法,即交互作用法和多组法。本文旨在比较结构方程模型中交互作用法和多组方法的中介效应。所使用的数据是 X 银行按揭付款的及时性案例。本文对统计方法进行了评估,以比较各组之间的间接效应,并考察各组的间接效应。结论是,可收回性状况通过支付意愿调节资本与付款及时性之间的间接关系。当前可收回性状态的债务人比未收回性状态的债务人对付款及时性的影响更大。用交互作用法和多组方法检验间接效应对调节作用的结果差别不大。在多组方法中,自举区间偏差小于交互方法中的自举区间偏差。两种方法的 Q 平方预测相关性值都很高,说明模型很好。当前可收集状态组的 Q^2 为 89.3%,不正确可收集状态组的 Q^2 为 84.2%。而在交互方法中,Q^2 为 70.4%。研究人员建议对具有分类调节变量的数据采用多组方法,因为无需在模型中添加交互变量,就可以直接观察到组间差异"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Mediation Effects on Interaction and Multigroup Approach in Structural Equation Modeling PLS in Case of Bank Mortgage
“Structural Equation Modeling is one of multivariate statistical method that used to explain multiple relationships between latent variables simultaneously to test a mediation model to conduct a formal test on mediation effects. Application PLS-SEM for exploratory research and theory development are increasing. Under certain conditions, the effect of exogenous variables on endogenous variable is also strengthened or weakened by moderating variable. In SEM, there are two approaches in analyzing moderation variables, namely the interaction method and the multigroup method. This article aims to compare the mediation effect on interaction approaches and multigroup approaches in Structural Equation Modeling. The data used is the case of timeliness of Bank X mortgage payments. In this article, statistical methods are evaluated to compare indirect effect between groups and examine indirect effect on each group. It was concluded that Collectability Status moderates the indirect relationship between Capital and the Timeliness of Payment through Willingness to Pay. Debtors with current collectability status more strongly effect the Timeliness of Payment than debtors with incurrect collectability status. Theresults of testing indirect effects on moderation with interaction and multigroup approaches are not much different. In the multigroup approach, the bootstrap interval bias is smaller than the bootstrap interval bias in the interaction approach. The Q-square Predictive Relevance value in both methods is quite high, indicating that the model is good. On the Current Collectibility Status group Q^2 is 89.3%, in the incurrect Collectibility Status Q^2 is 84.2%. While in the interaction approach, Q^2 is 70.4%. Researcher recommend a multigroup approach to data that has categorical moderation variables because differences between groups can be directly observed without adding interaction variables in the model.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信