刑事藐视法的装瓶--探寻 "丑化法庭 "的 "意图

Vijay Tyagi, Vaibhav Chadha, Lavam Tyagi, Shambhavi Srivastava
{"title":"刑事藐视法的装瓶--探寻 \"丑化法庭 \"的 \"意图","authors":"Vijay Tyagi, Vaibhav Chadha, Lavam Tyagi, Shambhavi Srivastava","doi":"10.17561/tahrj.v22.8305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to speak and express freely is arguably the most contentious fundamental right guaranteed to the citizens by the Indian Constitution. Like all the other rights and privileges in a democracy, freedom of speech is not absolute and is subject to restrictions. One such restriction is the offence of contempt of court. In doing so, courts have been successful in upholding their dignity and majesty but often at the cost of stifling criticism and instilling fear amongst the critics of the institution. There is a sense of anxiety among the citizens as they anticipate an over-disciplined regime and struggle to understand what constitutes criminal contempt and how it works. In this article, the authors have attempted to suggest a development in the existing criminal contempt law by scrutinising the mental element of the publisher or the person making the criticism.","PeriodicalId":164030,"journal":{"name":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","volume":"53 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bottling the Criminal Contempt Law – A Search for ‘Intention’ in ‘Scandalizing the Court’\",\"authors\":\"Vijay Tyagi, Vaibhav Chadha, Lavam Tyagi, Shambhavi Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.17561/tahrj.v22.8305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The right to speak and express freely is arguably the most contentious fundamental right guaranteed to the citizens by the Indian Constitution. Like all the other rights and privileges in a democracy, freedom of speech is not absolute and is subject to restrictions. One such restriction is the offence of contempt of court. In doing so, courts have been successful in upholding their dignity and majesty but often at the cost of stifling criticism and instilling fear amongst the critics of the institution. There is a sense of anxiety among the citizens as they anticipate an over-disciplined regime and struggle to understand what constitutes criminal contempt and how it works. In this article, the authors have attempted to suggest a development in the existing criminal contempt law by scrutinising the mental element of the publisher or the person making the criticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Age of Human Rights Journal\",\"volume\":\"53 44\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Age of Human Rights Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v22.8305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Age of Human Rights Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v22.8305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

言论自由权可以说是《印度宪法》保障公民享有的最有争议的基本权利。与民主社会中的所有其他权利和特权一样,言论自由也不是绝对的,也会受到限制。其中一项限制就是藐视法庭罪。在这样做的过程中,法院成功地维护了自身的尊严和威严,但代价往往是扼杀批评,并在批评者中间灌输恐惧。公民们预期会有一个纪律过度严明的制度,并努力理解什么是刑事藐视法庭以及它是如何运作的,因而产生了一种焦虑感。在本文中,作者试图通过审查发表者或批评者的心理因素,对现行的刑事蔑视法提出发展建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bottling the Criminal Contempt Law – A Search for ‘Intention’ in ‘Scandalizing the Court’
The right to speak and express freely is arguably the most contentious fundamental right guaranteed to the citizens by the Indian Constitution. Like all the other rights and privileges in a democracy, freedom of speech is not absolute and is subject to restrictions. One such restriction is the offence of contempt of court. In doing so, courts have been successful in upholding their dignity and majesty but often at the cost of stifling criticism and instilling fear amongst the critics of the institution. There is a sense of anxiety among the citizens as they anticipate an over-disciplined regime and struggle to understand what constitutes criminal contempt and how it works. In this article, the authors have attempted to suggest a development in the existing criminal contempt law by scrutinising the mental element of the publisher or the person making the criticism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信