利用印度尼西亚的动荡:刑事案件中的挑衅性媒体框架--道德报道还是误导性叙述?

Thamrin Suharman
{"title":"利用印度尼西亚的动荡:刑事案件中的挑衅性媒体框架--道德报道还是误导性叙述?","authors":"Thamrin Suharman","doi":"10.15294/imrev.v3i1.78899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study delves into the contentious terrain of media framing in criminal cases against the backdrop of Indonesia's tumultuous landscape, aiming to discern whether such practices adhere to ethical reporting standards or perpetuate misleading narratives. Through meticulous analysis, it unravels the intricate web of sensationalist language, biased perspectives, and selective coverage deployed by media outlets, illuminating their profound impact on shaping public perception and societal attitudes. One significant finding highlights the extent to which provocative media framing exacerbates existing tensions and deepens societal divides within Indonesia. By amplifying certain narratives while downplaying or omitting others, media outlets contribute to the polarization of public discourse, fueling mistrust and animosity among different segments of society. Moreover, the study underscores the ethical implications of such practices, raising crucial questions about the responsibilities of journalists and media organizations in navigating Indonesia's complex socio-political landscape. Amidst these challenges, the research emphasizes the imperative for media practitioners to uphold ethical principles and promote responsible reporting practices. By fostering a more nuanced and balanced narrative that reflects the diverse realities of Indonesian society, journalists can play a pivotal role in fostering understanding and unity. Furthermore, the study advocates for greater transparency and accountability within the media industry, urging stakeholders to critically evaluate the ethical considerations inherent in their reporting practices. In conclusion, this study serves as a call to action for journalists, media organizations, and policymakers to reevaluate their approach to media framing in criminal cases. By prioritizing ethical reporting standards and promoting a more inclusive narrative, Indonesia can move towards a media landscape that fosters dialogue, empathy, and social cohesion.","PeriodicalId":470679,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Media Law Review","volume":"749 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploiting Indonesia’s Turmoil: Provocative Media Framing in Criminal Cases—Ethical Reporting or Misleading Narratives?\",\"authors\":\"Thamrin Suharman\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/imrev.v3i1.78899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study delves into the contentious terrain of media framing in criminal cases against the backdrop of Indonesia's tumultuous landscape, aiming to discern whether such practices adhere to ethical reporting standards or perpetuate misleading narratives. Through meticulous analysis, it unravels the intricate web of sensationalist language, biased perspectives, and selective coverage deployed by media outlets, illuminating their profound impact on shaping public perception and societal attitudes. One significant finding highlights the extent to which provocative media framing exacerbates existing tensions and deepens societal divides within Indonesia. By amplifying certain narratives while downplaying or omitting others, media outlets contribute to the polarization of public discourse, fueling mistrust and animosity among different segments of society. Moreover, the study underscores the ethical implications of such practices, raising crucial questions about the responsibilities of journalists and media organizations in navigating Indonesia's complex socio-political landscape. Amidst these challenges, the research emphasizes the imperative for media practitioners to uphold ethical principles and promote responsible reporting practices. By fostering a more nuanced and balanced narrative that reflects the diverse realities of Indonesian society, journalists can play a pivotal role in fostering understanding and unity. Furthermore, the study advocates for greater transparency and accountability within the media industry, urging stakeholders to critically evaluate the ethical considerations inherent in their reporting practices. In conclusion, this study serves as a call to action for journalists, media organizations, and policymakers to reevaluate their approach to media framing in criminal cases. By prioritizing ethical reporting standards and promoting a more inclusive narrative, Indonesia can move towards a media landscape that fosters dialogue, empathy, and social cohesion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":470679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesia Media Law Review\",\"volume\":\"749 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesia Media Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/imrev.v3i1.78899\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Media Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/imrev.v3i1.78899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以印度尼西亚动荡不安的局势为背景,深入探讨了媒体在刑事案件中的报道方式是否具有争议性,旨在揭示此类报道方式是遵守了道德报道标准,还是延续了误导性叙述。通过细致的分析,该报告揭开了媒体煽情语言、偏颇视角和选择性报道的复杂网络,阐明了它们对塑造公众认知和社会态度的深远影响。其中一项重要发现强调了挑衅性的媒体报道加剧了印尼国内现有的紧张局势,加深了社会分歧。通过放大某些叙事而淡化或忽略其他叙事,媒体助长了公众言论的两极分化,加剧了社会不同阶层之间的不信任和敌意。此外,本研究还强调了这种做法的道德影响,提出了记者和媒体组织在印尼复杂的社会政治环境中的责任等重要问题。在这些挑战中,研究强调媒体从业人员必须坚持道德原则,促进负责任的报道实践。通过促进反映印尼社会不同现实的更加细致入微和平衡的叙述,记者可以在促进理解和团结方面发挥关键作用。此外,本研究还倡导提高媒体行业的透明度和问责制,敦促利益相关者批判性地评估其报道实践中固有的道德考量。总之,本研究呼吁记者、媒体组织和政策制定者采取行动,重新评估他们在刑事案件中的媒体报道方法。通过优先考虑道德报道标准和促进更具包容性的叙事方式,印尼可以朝着促进对话、同理心和社会凝聚力的媒体格局迈进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploiting Indonesia’s Turmoil: Provocative Media Framing in Criminal Cases—Ethical Reporting or Misleading Narratives?
This study delves into the contentious terrain of media framing in criminal cases against the backdrop of Indonesia's tumultuous landscape, aiming to discern whether such practices adhere to ethical reporting standards or perpetuate misleading narratives. Through meticulous analysis, it unravels the intricate web of sensationalist language, biased perspectives, and selective coverage deployed by media outlets, illuminating their profound impact on shaping public perception and societal attitudes. One significant finding highlights the extent to which provocative media framing exacerbates existing tensions and deepens societal divides within Indonesia. By amplifying certain narratives while downplaying or omitting others, media outlets contribute to the polarization of public discourse, fueling mistrust and animosity among different segments of society. Moreover, the study underscores the ethical implications of such practices, raising crucial questions about the responsibilities of journalists and media organizations in navigating Indonesia's complex socio-political landscape. Amidst these challenges, the research emphasizes the imperative for media practitioners to uphold ethical principles and promote responsible reporting practices. By fostering a more nuanced and balanced narrative that reflects the diverse realities of Indonesian society, journalists can play a pivotal role in fostering understanding and unity. Furthermore, the study advocates for greater transparency and accountability within the media industry, urging stakeholders to critically evaluate the ethical considerations inherent in their reporting practices. In conclusion, this study serves as a call to action for journalists, media organizations, and policymakers to reevaluate their approach to media framing in criminal cases. By prioritizing ethical reporting standards and promoting a more inclusive narrative, Indonesia can move towards a media landscape that fosters dialogue, empathy, and social cohesion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信