YouTube 上肩关节脱位视频的质量差异与来源有关

Q3 Medicine
Mehmet Kaymakoglu M.D. , Taha Aksoy M.D. , Ulas Can Kolac M.D. , Erdi Ozdemir M.D. , Nicholas N. DePhillipo Ph.D., M.B.A., A.T.C. , Gazi Huri M.D. , Flippo Familiari M.D.
{"title":"YouTube 上肩关节脱位视频的质量差异与来源有关","authors":"Mehmet Kaymakoglu M.D. ,&nbsp;Taha Aksoy M.D. ,&nbsp;Ulas Can Kolac M.D. ,&nbsp;Erdi Ozdemir M.D. ,&nbsp;Nicholas N. DePhillipo Ph.D., M.B.A., A.T.C. ,&nbsp;Gazi Huri M.D. ,&nbsp;Flippo Familiari M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the quality of YouTube videos for patient education on shoulder dislocation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A standard YouTube search was performed in March 2023 using the terms “shoulder dislocation,” “dislocated shoulder,” and “glenohumeral joint dislocation” to identify eligible videos. Multiple scoring systems, including DISCERN (a validated tool for analyzing the quality of health information in consumer-targeted videos), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to evaluate the videos. Video quality scores from various sources were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test for initial analysis, followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction, and the strength of relationship between variables was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 162 eligible videos were identified. The mean video duration was 11.38 ± 3.01 minutes, the median number of views was 653. Median number of days since upload was 1,972, the median view rate was 0.343, and median number of likes was 66.12. Based on the DISCERN classification, a substantial proportion of videos were classified as insufficient quality, with 19.4% as “very insufficient” and 42.1% as “insufficient”; 24.1% were classified as “average” quality, whereas only 13.1% were classified as “good” and 1.2% were “excellent.” Videos from academic and professional sources showed a significant positive correlation with DISCERN scores (rho: +0.784, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and greater scores on all 4 scoring systems compared to health information websites.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study reveals that the majority of YouTube videos on shoulder dislocation lack sufficient quality for patient education, with content quality significantly influenced by the source.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Examining the accuracy of information that patients encounter on YouTube is essential for health care providers to direct individuals toward more reliable sources of information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"6 3","pages":"Article 100921"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000397/pdfft?md5=ec38e4b24e5521b30aa6e07b33306045&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000397-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source-Dependent Quality Variation in Shoulder Dislocation Videos on YouTube\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Kaymakoglu M.D. ,&nbsp;Taha Aksoy M.D. ,&nbsp;Ulas Can Kolac M.D. ,&nbsp;Erdi Ozdemir M.D. ,&nbsp;Nicholas N. DePhillipo Ph.D., M.B.A., A.T.C. ,&nbsp;Gazi Huri M.D. ,&nbsp;Flippo Familiari M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the quality of YouTube videos for patient education on shoulder dislocation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A standard YouTube search was performed in March 2023 using the terms “shoulder dislocation,” “dislocated shoulder,” and “glenohumeral joint dislocation” to identify eligible videos. Multiple scoring systems, including DISCERN (a validated tool for analyzing the quality of health information in consumer-targeted videos), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to evaluate the videos. Video quality scores from various sources were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test for initial analysis, followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction, and the strength of relationship between variables was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 162 eligible videos were identified. The mean video duration was 11.38 ± 3.01 minutes, the median number of views was 653. Median number of days since upload was 1,972, the median view rate was 0.343, and median number of likes was 66.12. Based on the DISCERN classification, a substantial proportion of videos were classified as insufficient quality, with 19.4% as “very insufficient” and 42.1% as “insufficient”; 24.1% were classified as “average” quality, whereas only 13.1% were classified as “good” and 1.2% were “excellent.” Videos from academic and professional sources showed a significant positive correlation with DISCERN scores (rho: +0.784, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and greater scores on all 4 scoring systems compared to health information websites.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study reveals that the majority of YouTube videos on shoulder dislocation lack sufficient quality for patient education, with content quality significantly influenced by the source.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Examining the accuracy of information that patients encounter on YouTube is essential for health care providers to direct individuals toward more reliable sources of information.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000397/pdfft?md5=ec38e4b24e5521b30aa6e07b33306045&pid=1-s2.0-S2666061X24000397-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666061X24000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 2023 年 3 月,我们使用 "肩关节脱位"、"肩关节脱位 "和 "盂肱关节脱位 "等词在 YouTube 上进行了标准搜索,以确定符合条件的视频。评估视频时使用了多种评分系统,包括 DISCERN(分析以消费者为目标的视频中健康信息质量的有效工具)、《美国医学会杂志》(JAMA)基准标准和全球质量评分(GQS)。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验对不同来源的视频质量评分进行初步分析比较,然后进行 Dunn 后检验并进行 Bonferroni 校正,并使用 Spearman 等级相关系数评估变量之间的关系强度。视频平均时长为 11.38 ± 3.01 分钟,观看次数中位数为 653 次。上传天数中位数为 1,972 天,观看率中位数为 0.343,点赞数中位数为 66.12。根据 DISCERN 的分类,很大一部分视频被归类为质量不足,其中 19.4% 被归类为 "非常不足",42.1% 被归类为 "不足";24.1% 被归类为质量 "一般",而只有 13.1% 被归类为 "好",1.2% 被归类为 "优秀"。与健康信息网站相比,学术和专业来源的视频与 DISCERN 分数呈显著正相关(rho:+0.784,P <.001),并且在所有 4 个评分系统中的得分都更高。结论这项研究表明,YouTube 上大多数有关肩关节脱位的视频在患者教育方面都缺乏足够的质量,其内容质量受到来源的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Source-Dependent Quality Variation in Shoulder Dislocation Videos on YouTube

Purpose

To assess the quality of YouTube videos for patient education on shoulder dislocation.

Methods

A standard YouTube search was performed in March 2023 using the terms “shoulder dislocation,” “dislocated shoulder,” and “glenohumeral joint dislocation” to identify eligible videos. Multiple scoring systems, including DISCERN (a validated tool for analyzing the quality of health information in consumer-targeted videos), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) were used to evaluate the videos. Video quality scores from various sources were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test for initial analysis, followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction, and the strength of relationship between variables was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

Results

A total of 162 eligible videos were identified. The mean video duration was 11.38 ± 3.01 minutes, the median number of views was 653. Median number of days since upload was 1,972, the median view rate was 0.343, and median number of likes was 66.12. Based on the DISCERN classification, a substantial proportion of videos were classified as insufficient quality, with 19.4% as “very insufficient” and 42.1% as “insufficient”; 24.1% were classified as “average” quality, whereas only 13.1% were classified as “good” and 1.2% were “excellent.” Videos from academic and professional sources showed a significant positive correlation with DISCERN scores (rho: +0.784, P < .001) and greater scores on all 4 scoring systems compared to health information websites.

Conclusions

This study reveals that the majority of YouTube videos on shoulder dislocation lack sufficient quality for patient education, with content quality significantly influenced by the source.

Clinical Relevance

Examining the accuracy of information that patients encounter on YouTube is essential for health care providers to direct individuals toward more reliable sources of information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信