泌乳奶牛对不同颗粒配方饲料的偏好

{"title":"泌乳奶牛对不同颗粒配方饲料的偏好","authors":"","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two taste preference experiments were conducted with the same 8 multiparous lactating Jersey cattle (100 ± 7.1 DIM, 30.5 ± 4 0.06 kg of milk yield, 18.8 ± 2.52 kg of DMI in experiment 1; and 215 ± 7.1 DIM, 27.6 ± 3.98 kg of milk yield, 19.6 ± 3.03 kg of DMI in experiment 2). In experiment 1, 4 pellets were formulated and manufactured into 4.0-mm pellets. These were as follows: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, and 8.57% wheat middlings (ALFC); 72.3% corn grain, 18.5% wheat middlings, and 9.25% dried distillers grains and solubles (ENG); a pellet containing 100% dehydrated alfalfa meal (DALF); and a pellet containing a mixture of concentrate ingredients (GMIX; 43.1% corn grain, 26.3% dried distillers grains and solubles, 13.8% wheat middlings, 7.10% dry molasses, 3.18% soybean meal, 0.93% corn oil, and 5.6% minor constituents). Cows were offered 0.50 kg of pellets in a randomized arrangement within the feed bunk. Feed preference was ranked from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred and 4 the least. The resulting preference rankings were averaged (± SE) resulting in a highest (closest to 1) to lowest (furthest from 1) ranking as follows of ALFC (1.38 ± 0.164), ENG (2.13 ± 0.327), GMIX (2.88 ± 0.375), and DALF (3.13 ± 0.350). The probabilities of first choice were 70.6 ± 0.55% ALFC, 16.5 ± 0.46% ENG, 5.50 ± 0.475% DALF, and 7.48 ± 0.455% GMIX. A <em>Z</em>-test was conducted to determine the percentage a treatment would be chosen first differed from the value of no preference at 25%; ALFC and DALF differed from the mean value, whereas no difference was observed for ENG and GMIX. The most preferred pellet (ALFC) was used in a second study and compared against 3 other treatments in which different flavoring agents were added. In this study, 4 pellets were manufactured with ALFC: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 6.76% wheat middlings, and 1.81% oregano leaf (ALFCO); 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.22% wheat middlings, 0.10% melon flavoring, and 0.25% BitterOff (ALFCM); and 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.47% wheat middlings, and 0.10% licorice flavoring (ALFCL). The resulting preference rankings were averaged resulting in a highest to lowest ranking as follows: ALFC (1.25 ± 0.164), ALFCO (2.38 ± 0.263), ALFCM (2.63 ± 0.375), and ALFCL (3.25 ± 0.164). The probabilities of first choice were 81.9 ± 0.65% ALFC, 8.49 ± 0.46% ALFCO, 6.50 ± 0.481% ALFCM, and 3.12 ± 0.491% ALFCL. Of the pellet choices, ALFC and ALFCL differed from the mean value of no choice, whereas no difference was observed for ALFCO and ALFCM. Mixtures of corn grain and dehydrated alfalfa meal bound by wheat middlings may serve as a feeding strategy that is preferred by the animals and may be an effective reward to cows entering an automated milk system, and we were unable to improve preference by adding flavoring agents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 278-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000292/pdfft?md5=17fc850762d3c663bed9fee7582bf9ec&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910224000292-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feed preference in lactating dairy cows for different pellet formulations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2023-0517\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Two taste preference experiments were conducted with the same 8 multiparous lactating Jersey cattle (100 ± 7.1 DIM, 30.5 ± 4 0.06 kg of milk yield, 18.8 ± 2.52 kg of DMI in experiment 1; and 215 ± 7.1 DIM, 27.6 ± 3.98 kg of milk yield, 19.6 ± 3.03 kg of DMI in experiment 2). In experiment 1, 4 pellets were formulated and manufactured into 4.0-mm pellets. These were as follows: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, and 8.57% wheat middlings (ALFC); 72.3% corn grain, 18.5% wheat middlings, and 9.25% dried distillers grains and solubles (ENG); a pellet containing 100% dehydrated alfalfa meal (DALF); and a pellet containing a mixture of concentrate ingredients (GMIX; 43.1% corn grain, 26.3% dried distillers grains and solubles, 13.8% wheat middlings, 7.10% dry molasses, 3.18% soybean meal, 0.93% corn oil, and 5.6% minor constituents). Cows were offered 0.50 kg of pellets in a randomized arrangement within the feed bunk. Feed preference was ranked from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred and 4 the least. The resulting preference rankings were averaged (± SE) resulting in a highest (closest to 1) to lowest (furthest from 1) ranking as follows of ALFC (1.38 ± 0.164), ENG (2.13 ± 0.327), GMIX (2.88 ± 0.375), and DALF (3.13 ± 0.350). The probabilities of first choice were 70.6 ± 0.55% ALFC, 16.5 ± 0.46% ENG, 5.50 ± 0.475% DALF, and 7.48 ± 0.455% GMIX. A <em>Z</em>-test was conducted to determine the percentage a treatment would be chosen first differed from the value of no preference at 25%; ALFC and DALF differed from the mean value, whereas no difference was observed for ENG and GMIX. The most preferred pellet (ALFC) was used in a second study and compared against 3 other treatments in which different flavoring agents were added. In this study, 4 pellets were manufactured with ALFC: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 6.76% wheat middlings, and 1.81% oregano leaf (ALFCO); 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.22% wheat middlings, 0.10% melon flavoring, and 0.25% BitterOff (ALFCM); and 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.47% wheat middlings, and 0.10% licorice flavoring (ALFCL). The resulting preference rankings were averaged resulting in a highest to lowest ranking as follows: ALFC (1.25 ± 0.164), ALFCO (2.38 ± 0.263), ALFCM (2.63 ± 0.375), and ALFCL (3.25 ± 0.164). The probabilities of first choice were 81.9 ± 0.65% ALFC, 8.49 ± 0.46% ALFCO, 6.50 ± 0.481% ALFCM, and 3.12 ± 0.491% ALFCL. Of the pellet choices, ALFC and ALFCL differed from the mean value of no choice, whereas no difference was observed for ALFCO and ALFCM. Mixtures of corn grain and dehydrated alfalfa meal bound by wheat middlings may serve as a feeding strategy that is preferred by the animals and may be an effective reward to cows entering an automated milk system, and we were unable to improve preference by adding flavoring agents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 278-282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000292/pdfft?md5=17fc850762d3c663bed9fee7582bf9ec&pid=1-s2.0-S2666910224000292-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对相同的 8 头多胎泌乳泽西牛进行了两次口味偏好实验(实验 1:100 ± 7.1 DIM,30.5 ± 4 0.06 kg 产奶量,18.8 ± 2.52 kg DMI;实验 2:215 ± 7.1 DIM,27.6 ± 3.98 kg 产奶量,19.6 ± 3.03 kg DMI)。在实验 1 中,配制了 4 种颗粒,并制成 4.0 毫米的颗粒。这些颗粒如下45.7% 的苜蓿粉、45.7% 的玉米粒和 8.57% 的小麦粗粉(ALFC);72.3% 的玉米粒、18.5% 的小麦粗粉和 9.25% 的干燥蒸馏谷物和溶质(ENG);含有 100% 脱水苜蓿粉的颗粒料(DALF);以及含有精料成分混合物的颗粒料(GMIX;43.1%的玉米粒、26.3%的干蒸馏谷物和溶质、13.8%的小麦粗粉、7.10%的干糖蜜、3.18%的豆粕、0.93%的玉米油和 5.6%的次要成分)。奶牛在饲料仓内以随机排列的方式采食 0.50 千克颗粒饲料。饲料偏好度从 1 到 4 排列,1 为最偏好,4 为最不偏好。所得偏好排名的平均值(± SE)从最高(最接近 1)到最低(最远离 1)依次为 ALFC(1.38 ± 0.164)、ENG(2.13 ± 0.327)、GMIX(2.88 ± 0.375)和 DALF(3.13 ± 0.350)。首选概率为 70.6 ± 0.55% ALFC、16.5 ± 0.46% ENG、5.50 ± 0.475% DALF 和 7.48 ± 0.455% GMIX。进行了 Z 检验,以确定最先选择处理的百分比与无偏好值(25%)的差异;ALFC 和 DALF 与平均值有差异,而 ENG 和 GMIX 则无差异。在第二项研究中使用了最受青睐的颗粒(ALFC),并与添加了不同调味剂的其他 3 种处理进行了比较。在这项研究中,用 ALFC 制作了 4 种颗粒:45.7% 的苜蓿粉、45.7% 的玉米粒、6.76% 的小麦粗粉和 1.81% 的牛至叶(ALFCO);45.7% 的苜蓿粉、45.7% 的玉米粒、8.22%的小麦粗粉、0.10%的甜瓜香精和0.25%的苦味素(ALFCM);以及45.7%的苜蓿粉、45.7%的玉米粒、8.47%的小麦粗粉和0.10%的甘草香精(ALFCL)。对所得偏好排名进行平均,得出从高到低的排名如下:ALFC(1.25 ± 0.164)、ALFCO(2.38 ± 0.263)、ALFCM(2.63 ± 0.375)和 ALFCL(3.25 ± 0.164)。首选概率为 81.9 ± 0.65% ALFC、8.49 ± 0.46% ALFCO、6.50 ± 0.481% ALFCM 和 3.12 ± 0.491% ALFCL。在颗粒选择中,ALFC 和 ALFCL 与无选择的平均值不同,而 ALFCO 和 ALFCM 则无差异。玉米粒和脱水苜蓿粉与小麦胚芽的混合物可能是动物喜欢的一种饲喂策略,也可能是对进入全自动挤奶系统的奶牛的一种有效奖励,我们无法通过添加调味剂来提高动物的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feed preference in lactating dairy cows for different pellet formulations

Two taste preference experiments were conducted with the same 8 multiparous lactating Jersey cattle (100 ± 7.1 DIM, 30.5 ± 4 0.06 kg of milk yield, 18.8 ± 2.52 kg of DMI in experiment 1; and 215 ± 7.1 DIM, 27.6 ± 3.98 kg of milk yield, 19.6 ± 3.03 kg of DMI in experiment 2). In experiment 1, 4 pellets were formulated and manufactured into 4.0-mm pellets. These were as follows: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, and 8.57% wheat middlings (ALFC); 72.3% corn grain, 18.5% wheat middlings, and 9.25% dried distillers grains and solubles (ENG); a pellet containing 100% dehydrated alfalfa meal (DALF); and a pellet containing a mixture of concentrate ingredients (GMIX; 43.1% corn grain, 26.3% dried distillers grains and solubles, 13.8% wheat middlings, 7.10% dry molasses, 3.18% soybean meal, 0.93% corn oil, and 5.6% minor constituents). Cows were offered 0.50 kg of pellets in a randomized arrangement within the feed bunk. Feed preference was ranked from 1 to 4 with 1 being the most preferred and 4 the least. The resulting preference rankings were averaged (± SE) resulting in a highest (closest to 1) to lowest (furthest from 1) ranking as follows of ALFC (1.38 ± 0.164), ENG (2.13 ± 0.327), GMIX (2.88 ± 0.375), and DALF (3.13 ± 0.350). The probabilities of first choice were 70.6 ± 0.55% ALFC, 16.5 ± 0.46% ENG, 5.50 ± 0.475% DALF, and 7.48 ± 0.455% GMIX. A Z-test was conducted to determine the percentage a treatment would be chosen first differed from the value of no preference at 25%; ALFC and DALF differed from the mean value, whereas no difference was observed for ENG and GMIX. The most preferred pellet (ALFC) was used in a second study and compared against 3 other treatments in which different flavoring agents were added. In this study, 4 pellets were manufactured with ALFC: 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 6.76% wheat middlings, and 1.81% oregano leaf (ALFCO); 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.22% wheat middlings, 0.10% melon flavoring, and 0.25% BitterOff (ALFCM); and 45.7% alfalfa meal, 45.7% corn grain, 8.47% wheat middlings, and 0.10% licorice flavoring (ALFCL). The resulting preference rankings were averaged resulting in a highest to lowest ranking as follows: ALFC (1.25 ± 0.164), ALFCO (2.38 ± 0.263), ALFCM (2.63 ± 0.375), and ALFCL (3.25 ± 0.164). The probabilities of first choice were 81.9 ± 0.65% ALFC, 8.49 ± 0.46% ALFCO, 6.50 ± 0.481% ALFCM, and 3.12 ± 0.491% ALFCL. Of the pellet choices, ALFC and ALFCL differed from the mean value of no choice, whereas no difference was observed for ALFCO and ALFCM. Mixtures of corn grain and dehydrated alfalfa meal bound by wheat middlings may serve as a feeding strategy that is preferred by the animals and may be an effective reward to cows entering an automated milk system, and we were unable to improve preference by adding flavoring agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信