国际法在南非的影响：Blind SA 诉贸易、工业和竞争部长（CCT 320/21）[2022] ZACC 33（2022 年 9 月 21 日）

Q3 Social Sciences

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a15810

M. Forere

{"title":"国际法在南非的影响：Blind SA 诉贸易、工业和竞争部长（CCT 320/21）[2022] ZACC 33（2022 年 9 月 21 日）","authors":"M. Forere","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a15810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work is centred on the judgment of the Constitutional Court in Blind SA v The Minister of Trade (CCT 320/21) [2022] ZACC 33 (21 September 2022), and the issues raised by this judgement. The main concern for this contribution is the overreliance on a non-ratified treaty – the Marrakesh Treaty –, which calls for the assessment of the place of international law in South Africa. The paper finds that while the issues raised in the Blind SA case – the rights of people with disability – are legitimate, the manner in which they were raised went beyond the prescripts of the Constitution.","PeriodicalId":55857,"journal":{"name":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","volume":"23 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ramifications of International Law in South Africa: Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (CCT 320/21) [2022] ZACC 33 (21 September 2022)\",\"authors\":\"M. Forere\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a15810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work is centred on the judgment of the Constitutional Court in Blind SA v The Minister of Trade (CCT 320/21) [2022] ZACC 33 (21 September 2022), and the issues raised by this judgement. The main concern for this contribution is the overreliance on a non-ratified treaty – the Marrakesh Treaty –, which calls for the assessment of the place of international law in South Africa. The paper finds that while the issues raised in the Blind SA case – the rights of people with disability – are legitimate, the manner in which they were raised went beyond the prescripts of the Constitution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a15810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a15810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作的核心是宪法法院在 Blind SA 诉贸易部长（CCT 320/21）[2022] ZACC 33（2022 年 9 月 21 日）一案中的判决，以及该判决提出的问题。这篇论文的主要关注点是过度依赖未经批准的条约--《马拉喀什条约》，这就要求对国际法在南非的地位进行评估。本文认为，虽然 "南非盲人 "案中提出的问题--残疾人的权利--是合法的，但提出这些问题的方式超出了《宪法》的规定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Ramifications of International Law in South Africa: Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (CCT 320/21) [2022] ZACC 33 (21 September 2022)

This work is centred on the judgment of the Constitutional Court in Blind SA v The Minister of Trade (CCT 320/21) [2022] ZACC 33 (21 September 2022), and the issues raised by this judgement. The main concern for this contribution is the overreliance on a non-ratified treaty – the Marrakesh Treaty –, which calls for the assessment of the place of international law in South Africa. The paper finds that while the issues raised in the Blind SA case – the rights of people with disability – are legitimate, the manner in which they were raised went beyond the prescripts of the Constitution.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： PELJ/PER publishes contributions relevant to development in the South African constitutional state. This means that most contributions will concern some aspect of constitutionalism or legal development. The fact that the South African constitutional state is the focus, does not limit the content of PELJ/PER to the South African legal system, since development law and constitutionalism are excellent themes for comparative work. Contributions on any aspect or discipline of the law from any part of the world are thus welcomed.