{"title":"通过实验技术和基于方差分析的统计分析优化 3D 打印参数","authors":"N. Naveed, Muhammad Naveed Anwar","doi":"10.1002/pls2.10122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized the manufacturing industry by enabling the fabrication of complex geometries and designs with ease. 3D printing—fused deposition modeling (FDM) has emerged as a prevalent technique, owing to its versatility and cost‐effectiveness. However, the FDM process is complex and depends on multiple parameters, which makes it challenging to obtain high‐quality and consistent 3D printed components. The purpose of this study is to simplify the printing process for users and potentially improve the overall quality and consistency of printed objects. This research delved into optimising 3D printing parameters, specifically raster orientation and in‐fill speed, for PLA material through three experimental studies. The mean effect of these parameters and the effects of their interaction through analysis of variance (ANOVA) on tensile properties were also discussed. Initial experiments identified the most suitable parameters and its optimal values for PLA, which were then applied to five different materials: PETG, PLA tough, Recycle PLA, Plain PLA, and ABS. Tensile tests assessed the printed parts, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to analyze fracture interfaces and material failure causes. This study identified a raster of 45°/−45° and 30 mm/s infill speed as optimal for diverse 3D printing materials. Notably, ABS, PETG, and tough PLA exhibited better tensile strengths, surpassing manufacturer benchmarks. However, Plain PLA and Recycled PLA, despite lower tensile strengths, proved valuable for specific applications. Interestingly, all tested materials showed greater flexibility than manufacturer recommendations, suggesting their suitability in scenarios needing both strength and flexibility. This study's results offer promising avenues for refining 3D printing practices, to the advantage of all users. The findings from this study offer significant insights for future research to investigate the effect of other process parameters on the quality of 3D printed parts, leading to further advancements of AM.\nOptimised 3D printing parameters.\nApplicability of optimised settings extended across various materials.\nABS, PETG, and tough PLA exceeded manufacturer benchmarks in tensile strength.\nExperimental and ANOVA findings are in good agreement, revealing significant process parameters.\n","PeriodicalId":488843,"journal":{"name":"SPE polymers","volume":"358 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising 3D printing parameters through experimental techniques and ANOVA‐Based statistical analysis\",\"authors\":\"N. Naveed, Muhammad Naveed Anwar\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pls2.10122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized the manufacturing industry by enabling the fabrication of complex geometries and designs with ease. 3D printing—fused deposition modeling (FDM) has emerged as a prevalent technique, owing to its versatility and cost‐effectiveness. However, the FDM process is complex and depends on multiple parameters, which makes it challenging to obtain high‐quality and consistent 3D printed components. The purpose of this study is to simplify the printing process for users and potentially improve the overall quality and consistency of printed objects. This research delved into optimising 3D printing parameters, specifically raster orientation and in‐fill speed, for PLA material through three experimental studies. The mean effect of these parameters and the effects of their interaction through analysis of variance (ANOVA) on tensile properties were also discussed. Initial experiments identified the most suitable parameters and its optimal values for PLA, which were then applied to five different materials: PETG, PLA tough, Recycle PLA, Plain PLA, and ABS. Tensile tests assessed the printed parts, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to analyze fracture interfaces and material failure causes. This study identified a raster of 45°/−45° and 30 mm/s infill speed as optimal for diverse 3D printing materials. Notably, ABS, PETG, and tough PLA exhibited better tensile strengths, surpassing manufacturer benchmarks. However, Plain PLA and Recycled PLA, despite lower tensile strengths, proved valuable for specific applications. Interestingly, all tested materials showed greater flexibility than manufacturer recommendations, suggesting their suitability in scenarios needing both strength and flexibility. This study's results offer promising avenues for refining 3D printing practices, to the advantage of all users. The findings from this study offer significant insights for future research to investigate the effect of other process parameters on the quality of 3D printed parts, leading to further advancements of AM.\\nOptimised 3D printing parameters.\\nApplicability of optimised settings extended across various materials.\\nABS, PETG, and tough PLA exceeded manufacturer benchmarks in tensile strength.\\nExperimental and ANOVA findings are in good agreement, revealing significant process parameters.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":488843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SPE polymers\",\"volume\":\"358 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SPE polymers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.10122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE polymers","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.10122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
快速成型制造(AM)通过轻松制造复杂的几何形状和设计,彻底改变了制造业。三维打印-熔融沉积建模(FDM)因其多功能性和成本效益而成为一种流行的技术。然而,FDM 工艺复杂且取决于多个参数,这使得获得高质量且一致的三维打印部件具有挑战性。本研究的目的是简化用户的打印过程,并提高打印对象的整体质量和一致性。本研究通过三项实验研究,对聚乳酸材料的三维打印参数(特别是光栅方向和填充速度)进行了优化。此外,还通过方差分析(ANOVA)讨论了这些参数的平均效应及其对拉伸性能的交互效应。最初的实验确定了最适合聚乳酸的参数及其最佳值,然后将其应用于五种不同的材料:PETG、韧性聚乳酸、回收聚乳酸、普通聚乳酸和 ABS。拉伸试验对打印部件进行了评估,扫描电子显微镜(SEM)用于分析断裂界面和材料失效原因。这项研究确定了 45°/-45° 的光栅和 30 mm/s 的填充速度是各种 3D 打印材料的最佳选择。值得注意的是,ABS、PETG 和韧性聚乳酸表现出更好的拉伸强度,超过了制造商的基准。不过,尽管普通聚乳酸和回收聚乳酸的拉伸强度较低,但它们在特定应用中仍具有价值。有趣的是,所有测试材料都显示出比制造商推荐值更高的柔韧性,这表明它们适用于同时需要强度和柔韧性的应用场合。这项研究的结果为完善三维打印实践提供了很好的途径,有利于所有用户。优化的 3D 打印参数:优化设置的适用性扩展到各种材料:ABS、PETG 和韧性聚乳酸的拉伸强度超过了制造商的基准;实验结果和方差分析结果非常吻合,揭示了重要的工艺参数。
Optimising 3D printing parameters through experimental techniques and ANOVA‐Based statistical analysis
Additive manufacturing (AM) has revolutionized the manufacturing industry by enabling the fabrication of complex geometries and designs with ease. 3D printing—fused deposition modeling (FDM) has emerged as a prevalent technique, owing to its versatility and cost‐effectiveness. However, the FDM process is complex and depends on multiple parameters, which makes it challenging to obtain high‐quality and consistent 3D printed components. The purpose of this study is to simplify the printing process for users and potentially improve the overall quality and consistency of printed objects. This research delved into optimising 3D printing parameters, specifically raster orientation and in‐fill speed, for PLA material through three experimental studies. The mean effect of these parameters and the effects of their interaction through analysis of variance (ANOVA) on tensile properties were also discussed. Initial experiments identified the most suitable parameters and its optimal values for PLA, which were then applied to five different materials: PETG, PLA tough, Recycle PLA, Plain PLA, and ABS. Tensile tests assessed the printed parts, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was employed to analyze fracture interfaces and material failure causes. This study identified a raster of 45°/−45° and 30 mm/s infill speed as optimal for diverse 3D printing materials. Notably, ABS, PETG, and tough PLA exhibited better tensile strengths, surpassing manufacturer benchmarks. However, Plain PLA and Recycled PLA, despite lower tensile strengths, proved valuable for specific applications. Interestingly, all tested materials showed greater flexibility than manufacturer recommendations, suggesting their suitability in scenarios needing both strength and flexibility. This study's results offer promising avenues for refining 3D printing practices, to the advantage of all users. The findings from this study offer significant insights for future research to investigate the effect of other process parameters on the quality of 3D printed parts, leading to further advancements of AM.
Optimised 3D printing parameters.
Applicability of optimised settings extended across various materials.
ABS, PETG, and tough PLA exceeded manufacturer benchmarks in tensile strength.
Experimental and ANOVA findings are in good agreement, revealing significant process parameters.