公共卫生在后多布斯世界中的作用--纽约市人工流产中心

T.B. Stein, A. Vasan
{"title":"公共卫生在后多布斯世界中的作用--纽约市人工流产中心","authors":"T.B. Stein, A. Vasan","doi":"10.1097/01.aoa.0001005292.74993.be","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"(N Engl J Med. 388;21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2301278)\n The US court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization removed the constitutional right to abortion. Currently, 13 states ban abortion with few exceptions, while other states have enacted certain restrictions around abortion. This, coupled with new legislation frequently being introduced that further restricts access to abortions, has made it very difficult for people searching for abortion information or services.","PeriodicalId":19432,"journal":{"name":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Health’s Role in a Post-Dobbs World—The New York City Abortion Access Hub\",\"authors\":\"T.B. Stein, A. Vasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aoa.0001005292.74993.be\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"(N Engl J Med. 388;21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2301278)\\n The US court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization removed the constitutional right to abortion. Currently, 13 states ban abortion with few exceptions, while other states have enacted certain restrictions around abortion. This, coupled with new legislation frequently being introduced that further restricts access to abortions, has made it very difficult for people searching for abortion information or services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001005292.74993.be\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetric Anesthesia Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0001005292.74993.be","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

(N Engl J Med. 388;21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2301278) 美国法院在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案中取消了宪法规定的堕胎权。目前,美国有 13 个州禁止堕胎,只有极少数例外,其他州也对堕胎做出了一定的限制。再加上经常出台新的立法进一步限制堕胎,这使得人们在寻找堕胎信息或服务时非常困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Health’s Role in a Post-Dobbs World—The New York City Abortion Access Hub
(N Engl J Med. 388;21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2301278) The US court case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization removed the constitutional right to abortion. Currently, 13 states ban abortion with few exceptions, while other states have enacted certain restrictions around abortion. This, coupled with new legislation frequently being introduced that further restricts access to abortions, has made it very difficult for people searching for abortion information or services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信