参议院第 202 号法案出台后佐治亚州地方选举官员的动向

Q2 Social Sciences
M. V. (Trey) Hood, Seth C. McKee
{"title":"参议院第 202 号法案出台后佐治亚州地方选举官员的动向","authors":"M. V. (Trey) Hood, Seth C. McKee","doi":"10.1177/0160323x241234561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of Republicans’ stinging losses in 2020 and 2021, which contributed to relinquishing the presidency and U.S. Senate majority, respectively, Georgia’s GOP lawmakers passed comprehensive electoral reform in Senate Bill (SB) 202. In this Field Note, we outline SB 202’s major provisions, and then present results of a survey querying Georgia local election officials (LEOs) to assess how SB 202 affected administrative performance in the 2022 midterm elections. Unquestionably, SB 202’s raft of reforms greatly altered Georgia’s administrative apparatus, but it is anything but clear that these changes in the aggregate either improved or detracted from the system it replaced. Indeed, the most credible judgment rendered from LEOs, is that administrative performance is case-specific, and therefore highly contingent upon the reform of interest.","PeriodicalId":52260,"journal":{"name":"State and Local Government Review","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking the Pulse of Georgia Local Election Officials After Senate Bill 202\",\"authors\":\"M. V. (Trey) Hood, Seth C. McKee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0160323x241234561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the aftermath of Republicans’ stinging losses in 2020 and 2021, which contributed to relinquishing the presidency and U.S. Senate majority, respectively, Georgia’s GOP lawmakers passed comprehensive electoral reform in Senate Bill (SB) 202. In this Field Note, we outline SB 202’s major provisions, and then present results of a survey querying Georgia local election officials (LEOs) to assess how SB 202 affected administrative performance in the 2022 midterm elections. Unquestionably, SB 202’s raft of reforms greatly altered Georgia’s administrative apparatus, but it is anything but clear that these changes in the aggregate either improved or detracted from the system it replaced. Indeed, the most credible judgment rendered from LEOs, is that administrative performance is case-specific, and therefore highly contingent upon the reform of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State and Local Government Review\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State and Local Government Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x241234561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State and Local Government Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x241234561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共和党在 2020 年和 2021 年的惨败分别导致他们放弃了总统职位和美国参议院的多数席位,此后,佐治亚州的共和党立法者通过了《参议院法案》(SB)202,进行了全面的选举改革。在本实地说明中,我们概述了 SB 202 的主要条款,然后介绍了对佐治亚州地方选举官员(LEOs)的调查结果,以评估 SB 202 对 2022 年中期选举的行政表现有何影响。毫无疑问,SB 202 的一系列改革极大地改变了佐治亚州的行政机构,但这些改革总体上是改善了还是削弱了它所取代的系统,这一点并不清楚。事实上,从地方行政官员那里得到的最可信的判断是,行政绩效是针对具体案例的,因此在很大程度上取决于所关注的改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking the Pulse of Georgia Local Election Officials After Senate Bill 202
In the aftermath of Republicans’ stinging losses in 2020 and 2021, which contributed to relinquishing the presidency and U.S. Senate majority, respectively, Georgia’s GOP lawmakers passed comprehensive electoral reform in Senate Bill (SB) 202. In this Field Note, we outline SB 202’s major provisions, and then present results of a survey querying Georgia local election officials (LEOs) to assess how SB 202 affected administrative performance in the 2022 midterm elections. Unquestionably, SB 202’s raft of reforms greatly altered Georgia’s administrative apparatus, but it is anything but clear that these changes in the aggregate either improved or detracted from the system it replaced. Indeed, the most credible judgment rendered from LEOs, is that administrative performance is case-specific, and therefore highly contingent upon the reform of interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
State and Local Government Review
State and Local Government Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信