{"title":"三种长效头孢菌素对脆弱拟杆菌、胃链球菌和产气荚膜梭菌的体外活性研究。","authors":"B Watt, M G Naden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The in-vitro activity of three long-acting cephalosporins (cefotetan, cefonicid and ceftriaxone) was compared against 206 clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis, Peptostreptococcus species and Clostridium perfringens, using an agar dilution procedure to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Clindamycin was included as a comparator. Cefotetan was much more active than the two other cephalosporins against strains of Bacteroides fragilis (MIC90 16 mg/l compared with greater than 128 mg/l for the other two agents). Cefotetan also demonstrated superior activity against anaerobic cocci. All three compounds showed good activity against strains of Clostridium perfringens. Clindamycin was active against all of the test strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":"7 4","pages":"264-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The in-vitro activity of three long-acting cephalosporins against Bacteroides fragilis, Peptostreptococcus species and Clostridium perfringens.\",\"authors\":\"B Watt, M G Naden\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The in-vitro activity of three long-acting cephalosporins (cefotetan, cefonicid and ceftriaxone) was compared against 206 clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis, Peptostreptococcus species and Clostridium perfringens, using an agar dilution procedure to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Clindamycin was included as a comparator. Cefotetan was much more active than the two other cephalosporins against strains of Bacteroides fragilis (MIC90 16 mg/l compared with greater than 128 mg/l for the other two agents). Cefotetan also demonstrated superior activity against anaerobic cocci. All three compounds showed good activity against strains of Clostridium perfringens. Clindamycin was active against all of the test strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"264-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The in-vitro activity of three long-acting cephalosporins against Bacteroides fragilis, Peptostreptococcus species and Clostridium perfringens.
The in-vitro activity of three long-acting cephalosporins (cefotetan, cefonicid and ceftriaxone) was compared against 206 clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis, Peptostreptococcus species and Clostridium perfringens, using an agar dilution procedure to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Clindamycin was included as a comparator. Cefotetan was much more active than the two other cephalosporins against strains of Bacteroides fragilis (MIC90 16 mg/l compared with greater than 128 mg/l for the other two agents). Cefotetan also demonstrated superior activity against anaerobic cocci. All three compounds showed good activity against strains of Clostridium perfringens. Clindamycin was active against all of the test strains.