选择患者报告的结果指标:"什么 "和 "为谁"

Jason B Liu, Nan E. Rothrock, Maria O Edelen
{"title":"选择患者报告的结果指标:\"什么 \"和 \"为谁\"","authors":"Jason B Liu, Nan E. Rothrock, Maria O Edelen","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n PROMs are becoming more widely implemented across health care for important reasons. However, with thousands of PROMs available and the science of psychometrics becoming more widely applied in health measurement, choosing the right ones to implement can be puzzling. This article provides a framework of the different types of PROMs by organizing them into four categories based upon “what” is being measured and “from whom” the questions are asked: (1) condition-specific and domain-specific, (2) condition-specific and global, (3) universal and global, and (4) universal and domain-specific. We delve deeper into each category with clinical examples. This framework can empower health care leaders and policymakers to make more informed decisions when selecting the best PROMs to implement, ensuring PROMs deliver on their potential to promote value-based care.","PeriodicalId":502462,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs Scholar","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: “What” and “For Whom”\",\"authors\":\"Jason B Liu, Nan E. Rothrock, Maria O Edelen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n PROMs are becoming more widely implemented across health care for important reasons. However, with thousands of PROMs available and the science of psychometrics becoming more widely applied in health measurement, choosing the right ones to implement can be puzzling. This article provides a framework of the different types of PROMs by organizing them into four categories based upon “what” is being measured and “from whom” the questions are asked: (1) condition-specific and domain-specific, (2) condition-specific and global, (3) universal and global, and (4) universal and domain-specific. We delve deeper into each category with clinical examples. This framework can empower health care leaders and policymakers to make more informed decisions when selecting the best PROMs to implement, ensuring PROMs deliver on their potential to promote value-based care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Affairs Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PROM 在医疗保健领域的应用越来越广泛,这其中有很多重要的原因。然而,由于有成千上万种 PROMs 可供使用,而且心理测量学在健康测量中的应用也越来越广泛,因此选择正确的 PROMs 来实施可能会令人费解。本文根据 "测量什么 "和 "向谁 "提问,将 PROMs 分成四类,为不同类型的 PROMs 提供了一个框架:(1) 特定条件和特定领域,(2) 特定条件和全球,(3) 通用和全球,以及 (4) 通用和特定领域。我们将结合临床实例深入探讨每一类问题。该框架可帮助医疗保健领导者和政策制定者在选择最佳 PROMs 时做出更明智的决策,确保 PROMs 发挥其促进基于价值的医疗保健的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selecting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: “What” and “For Whom”
PROMs are becoming more widely implemented across health care for important reasons. However, with thousands of PROMs available and the science of psychometrics becoming more widely applied in health measurement, choosing the right ones to implement can be puzzling. This article provides a framework of the different types of PROMs by organizing them into four categories based upon “what” is being measured and “from whom” the questions are asked: (1) condition-specific and domain-specific, (2) condition-specific and global, (3) universal and global, and (4) universal and domain-specific. We delve deeper into each category with clinical examples. This framework can empower health care leaders and policymakers to make more informed decisions when selecting the best PROMs to implement, ensuring PROMs deliver on their potential to promote value-based care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信