长侧向质量螺钉插入扭矩调查

Seiya Watanabe, Kazuo Nakanishi, Y. Sugimoto, Kazuya Uchino, Hideaki Iba
{"title":"长侧向质量螺钉插入扭矩调查","authors":"Seiya Watanabe, Kazuo Nakanishi, Y. Sugimoto, Kazuya Uchino, Hideaki Iba","doi":"10.25259/sni_147_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nHere, we assessed a new trajectory and insertion torque for the placement of a long lateral mass screw (LLMS) that offers stronger posterior fixation versus a shorter lateral mass screw (LMS) in the posterior cervical spine. We report a short technical note of the insertion torque of LLMS.\n\n\n\nThe insertion trajectory/torque was evaluated in 30 patients (10 males and 20 females) undergoing posterior cervical LLMS fusions (2021–2023). Patients averaged 65 years of age. Pathology included eight cervical spine injuries, ten cord injuries, four dislocations/fractures, and eight other entities. Variables studied included the length of the LLMS inserted from C3–7, screw deviation rates, insertion torque, and adverse events.\n\n\n\nA total of 146 screws were inserted: 11 pedicle screws (PSs) and 135 LLMS. The average insertion torque was 105.9 cNm for PS and 64.9 cNm for LLMS. As the screw lengthened by 1 mm, the insertion torque increased by approximately 4.4 cNm.\n\n\n\nHere, we documented that the insertion torque of LLMS was 66.1 cNm, greater than the 51.0 cNm for LMS, which should provide stronger posterior cervical fixation.\n","PeriodicalId":504441,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Neurology International","volume":"54 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of long lateral mass screw insertion torque\",\"authors\":\"Seiya Watanabe, Kazuo Nakanishi, Y. Sugimoto, Kazuya Uchino, Hideaki Iba\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/sni_147_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nHere, we assessed a new trajectory and insertion torque for the placement of a long lateral mass screw (LLMS) that offers stronger posterior fixation versus a shorter lateral mass screw (LMS) in the posterior cervical spine. We report a short technical note of the insertion torque of LLMS.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe insertion trajectory/torque was evaluated in 30 patients (10 males and 20 females) undergoing posterior cervical LLMS fusions (2021–2023). Patients averaged 65 years of age. Pathology included eight cervical spine injuries, ten cord injuries, four dislocations/fractures, and eight other entities. Variables studied included the length of the LLMS inserted from C3–7, screw deviation rates, insertion torque, and adverse events.\\n\\n\\n\\nA total of 146 screws were inserted: 11 pedicle screws (PSs) and 135 LLMS. The average insertion torque was 105.9 cNm for PS and 64.9 cNm for LLMS. As the screw lengthened by 1 mm, the insertion torque increased by approximately 4.4 cNm.\\n\\n\\n\\nHere, we documented that the insertion torque of LLMS was 66.1 cNm, greater than the 51.0 cNm for LMS, which should provide stronger posterior cervical fixation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":504441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Neurology International\",\"volume\":\"54 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Neurology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_147_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/sni_147_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在此,我们对颈椎后路长侧方螺钉(LLMS)置入的新轨迹和插入扭矩进行了评估,与较短的侧方螺钉(LMS)相比,LLMS可提供更强的后路固定。我们报告了关于 LLMS 插入扭矩的简短技术说明。我们对接受颈椎后路 LLMS 融合术(2021-2023 年)的 30 名患者(10 名男性和 20 名女性)的插入轨迹/扭矩进行了评估。患者平均年龄为 65 岁。病理类型包括八种颈椎损伤、十种脊髓损伤、四种脱位/骨折和八种其他类型。研究变量包括从C3-7插入的LLMS长度、螺钉偏离率、插入扭矩和不良事件:总共插入了146枚螺钉:11枚椎弓根螺钉(PS)和135枚LLMS。椎弓根螺钉的平均插入扭矩为105.9 cNm,椎弓根螺钉的平均插入扭矩为64.9 cNm。在此,我们记录了LLMS的插入扭矩为66.1 cNm,大于LMS的51.0 cNm,这应该能提供更强的颈椎后路固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of long lateral mass screw insertion torque
Here, we assessed a new trajectory and insertion torque for the placement of a long lateral mass screw (LLMS) that offers stronger posterior fixation versus a shorter lateral mass screw (LMS) in the posterior cervical spine. We report a short technical note of the insertion torque of LLMS. The insertion trajectory/torque was evaluated in 30 patients (10 males and 20 females) undergoing posterior cervical LLMS fusions (2021–2023). Patients averaged 65 years of age. Pathology included eight cervical spine injuries, ten cord injuries, four dislocations/fractures, and eight other entities. Variables studied included the length of the LLMS inserted from C3–7, screw deviation rates, insertion torque, and adverse events. A total of 146 screws were inserted: 11 pedicle screws (PSs) and 135 LLMS. The average insertion torque was 105.9 cNm for PS and 64.9 cNm for LLMS. As the screw lengthened by 1 mm, the insertion torque increased by approximately 4.4 cNm. Here, we documented that the insertion torque of LLMS was 66.1 cNm, greater than the 51.0 cNm for LMS, which should provide stronger posterior cervical fixation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信