利用 i-PARIHS 理论框架制定中心静脉导管维护的循证实施策略:多站点质量改进项目。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Wenchao Wang, Qin Fu, Weijie Shen, Yulu Xu, Linjuan Wang, Xiao Chun, Yuyun Shi, Jianping Lin, Yaxun Zhao, Ying Gu
{"title":"利用 i-PARIHS 理论框架制定中心静脉导管维护的循证实施策略:多站点质量改进项目。","authors":"Wenchao Wang, Qin Fu, Weijie Shen, Yulu Xu, Linjuan Wang, Xiao Chun, Yuyun Shi, Jianping Lin, Yaxun Zhao, Ying Gu","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence-based nursing practice can reduce complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). In this project, the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework was considered an ideal theoretical instrument to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project was conducted in pediatric intensive care units in six Chinese tertiary children's hospitals. Twenty-two audit criteria were obtained from best practice recommendations, and a baseline audit was conducted to assess current practice against best practice. Next, the i-PARIHS framework was used to identify facilitators and barriers to best practice and develop improvement strategies. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators and barriers were identified at the innovation, recipient, and context levels. A comprehensive CVC maintenance strategy was then developed to apply the best evidence to nurses' clinical work. Of the 22 audit criteria, 17 showed significant improvement compared with the baseline audit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The i-PARIHS framework is an effective tool for developing targeted, evidence-based improvement strategies and applying these to the clinical setting. The quality of the nurses' clinical practice improved during CVC maintenance. However, there is no certainty that these positive results can be maintained, and long-term data are needed to verify this.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A185.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":"195-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the i-PARIHS theoretical framework to develop evidence implementation strategies for central venous catheter maintenance: a multi-site quality improvement project.\",\"authors\":\"Wenchao Wang, Qin Fu, Weijie Shen, Yulu Xu, Linjuan Wang, Xiao Chun, Yuyun Shi, Jianping Lin, Yaxun Zhao, Ying Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence-based nursing practice can reduce complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). In this project, the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework was considered an ideal theoretical instrument to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project was conducted in pediatric intensive care units in six Chinese tertiary children's hospitals. Twenty-two audit criteria were obtained from best practice recommendations, and a baseline audit was conducted to assess current practice against best practice. Next, the i-PARIHS framework was used to identify facilitators and barriers to best practice and develop improvement strategies. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators and barriers were identified at the innovation, recipient, and context levels. A comprehensive CVC maintenance strategy was then developed to apply the best evidence to nurses' clinical work. Of the 22 audit criteria, 17 showed significant improvement compared with the baseline audit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The i-PARIHS framework is an effective tool for developing targeted, evidence-based improvement strategies and applying these to the clinical setting. The quality of the nurses' clinical practice improved during CVC maintenance. However, there is no certainty that these positive results can be maintained, and long-term data are needed to verify this.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A185.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jbi Evidence Implementation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"195-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107888/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jbi Evidence Implementation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:循证护理实践可以减少与中心静脉导管(CVC)相关的并发症。在该项目中,健康服务研究实施综合促进行动(i-PARIHS)框架被认为是确定实施循证实践的促进因素和障碍的理想理论工具:该项目在中国六家三级儿童医院的儿科重症监护室开展。从最佳实践建议中获得了 22 项审核标准,并进行了基线审核,以对照最佳实践评估当前实践。然后,利用 i-PARIHS 框架识别最佳实践的促进因素和障碍,并制定改进策略。然后进行后续审计,以衡量在遵守最佳做法方面的变化:结果:从创新、受援国和背景三个层面确定了促进因素和障碍。然后制定了一套全面的 CVC 维护策略,将最佳证据应用到护士的临床工作中。在 22 项审核标准中,有 17 项与基线审核相比有明显改善:i-PARIHS框架是一种有效的工具,可用于制定有针对性的循证改进策略并将其应用于临床环境。在 CVC 维护期间,护士的临床实践质量有所提高。然而,目前还不能确定这些积极成果能否保持下去,还需要长期数据来验证。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A185。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the i-PARIHS theoretical framework to develop evidence implementation strategies for central venous catheter maintenance: a multi-site quality improvement project.

Introduction: Evidence-based nursing practice can reduce complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). In this project, the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework was considered an ideal theoretical instrument to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing evidence-based practice.

Methods: The project was conducted in pediatric intensive care units in six Chinese tertiary children's hospitals. Twenty-two audit criteria were obtained from best practice recommendations, and a baseline audit was conducted to assess current practice against best practice. Next, the i-PARIHS framework was used to identify facilitators and barriers to best practice and develop improvement strategies. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.

Results: Facilitators and barriers were identified at the innovation, recipient, and context levels. A comprehensive CVC maintenance strategy was then developed to apply the best evidence to nurses' clinical work. Of the 22 audit criteria, 17 showed significant improvement compared with the baseline audit.

Conclusions: The i-PARIHS framework is an effective tool for developing targeted, evidence-based improvement strategies and applying these to the clinical setting. The quality of the nurses' clinical practice improved during CVC maintenance. However, there is no certainty that these positive results can be maintained, and long-term data are needed to verify this.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A185.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信