与游离酸形式相比,β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸钙盐的生物利用率更高。

IF 3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Heitor Rodrigues Ribeiro, Felipe Gregório Jardim, Miriam Sanz Roldán, Vitor de Salles Painelli, Vinicius da Eira Silva, Aline Cristina Capparelli Tritto, Andressa Formalioni, Giovani Boldrini Custoias, Wagner Ribeiro Pereira, Marina Yazigi Solis, Felipe Carvalho, Ernani Pinto Junior, Guilherme Giannini Artioli
{"title":"与游离酸形式相比,β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸钙盐的生物利用率更高。","authors":"Heitor Rodrigues Ribeiro, Felipe Gregório Jardim, Miriam Sanz Roldán, Vitor de Salles Painelli, Vinicius da Eira Silva, Aline Cristina Capparelli Tritto, Andressa Formalioni, Giovani Boldrini Custoias, Wagner Ribeiro Pereira, Marina Yazigi Solis, Felipe Carvalho, Ernani Pinto Junior, Guilherme Giannini Artioli","doi":"10.1007/s00726-023-03369-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the bioavailability of the calcium salt (HMB-Ca) and the free acid (HMB-FA) forms of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB). Sixteen young individuals received the following treatments on three different occasions in a counterbalanced crossover fashion: (1) HMB-FA in clear capsules; (2) HMB-Ca in gelatine capsules; (3) HMB-Ca dissolved in water. All treatments provided 1 g of HMB. Blood samples were taken before and on multiple time points following ingestion. The following parameters were calculated: peak plasma (Cmax), time to peak (Tmax), slope of HMB appearance in blood, area under the curve (AUC), half-life time (t<sub>1/2</sub>) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in water set as reference). All treatments led to rapid and large increases in plasma HMB. HMB-Ca in capsules and in water showed similar plasma HMB values across time (p = 0.438). HMB-FA resulted in lower concentrations vs. the other treatments (both p < 0.001). AUC (HMB-Ca in capsules: 50,078 ± 10,507; HMB-Ca in water: 47,871 ± 10,783; HMB-FA: 29,130 ± 12,946 µmol L<sup>-1</sup> × 720 min), Cmax (HMB-Ca in capsules: 229.2 ± 65.9; HMB-Ca in water: 249.7 ± 49.7; HMB-FA: 139.1 ± 67.2 µmol L<sup>-1</sup>) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in capsules: 104.8 ± 14.9%; HMB-FA: 61.5 ± 17.0%) were lower in HMB-FA vs. HMB-Ca (all p < 0.001). HMB-Ca in water resulted in the fastest Tmax (43 ± 22 min) compared to HMB-Ca in capsules (79 ± 40 min) and HMB-FA (78 ± 21 min) (all p < 0.05), while t<sub>1/2</sub> was similar between treatments. To conclude, HMB-Ca exhibited superior bioavailability compared to HMB-FA, with HMB-Ca in water showing faster absorption. Elimination kinetics were similar across all forms, suggesting that the pharmaceutical form of HMB affects the absorption rates, but not its distribution or elimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":7810,"journal":{"name":"Amino Acids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10987370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Superior bioavailability of the calcium salt form of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate compared with the free acid form.\",\"authors\":\"Heitor Rodrigues Ribeiro, Felipe Gregório Jardim, Miriam Sanz Roldán, Vitor de Salles Painelli, Vinicius da Eira Silva, Aline Cristina Capparelli Tritto, Andressa Formalioni, Giovani Boldrini Custoias, Wagner Ribeiro Pereira, Marina Yazigi Solis, Felipe Carvalho, Ernani Pinto Junior, Guilherme Giannini Artioli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00726-023-03369-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We investigated the bioavailability of the calcium salt (HMB-Ca) and the free acid (HMB-FA) forms of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB). Sixteen young individuals received the following treatments on three different occasions in a counterbalanced crossover fashion: (1) HMB-FA in clear capsules; (2) HMB-Ca in gelatine capsules; (3) HMB-Ca dissolved in water. All treatments provided 1 g of HMB. Blood samples were taken before and on multiple time points following ingestion. The following parameters were calculated: peak plasma (Cmax), time to peak (Tmax), slope of HMB appearance in blood, area under the curve (AUC), half-life time (t<sub>1/2</sub>) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in water set as reference). All treatments led to rapid and large increases in plasma HMB. HMB-Ca in capsules and in water showed similar plasma HMB values across time (p = 0.438). HMB-FA resulted in lower concentrations vs. the other treatments (both p < 0.001). AUC (HMB-Ca in capsules: 50,078 ± 10,507; HMB-Ca in water: 47,871 ± 10,783; HMB-FA: 29,130 ± 12,946 µmol L<sup>-1</sup> × 720 min), Cmax (HMB-Ca in capsules: 229.2 ± 65.9; HMB-Ca in water: 249.7 ± 49.7; HMB-FA: 139.1 ± 67.2 µmol L<sup>-1</sup>) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in capsules: 104.8 ± 14.9%; HMB-FA: 61.5 ± 17.0%) were lower in HMB-FA vs. HMB-Ca (all p < 0.001). HMB-Ca in water resulted in the fastest Tmax (43 ± 22 min) compared to HMB-Ca in capsules (79 ± 40 min) and HMB-FA (78 ± 21 min) (all p < 0.05), while t<sub>1/2</sub> was similar between treatments. To conclude, HMB-Ca exhibited superior bioavailability compared to HMB-FA, with HMB-Ca in water showing faster absorption. Elimination kinetics were similar across all forms, suggesting that the pharmaceutical form of HMB affects the absorption rates, but not its distribution or elimination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amino Acids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10987370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amino Acids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-023-03369-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amino Acids","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-023-03369-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸(HMB)的钙盐(HMB-Ca)和游离酸(HMB-FA)形式的生物利用度。16 名年轻人在三个不同的场合以平衡交叉的方式接受了以下治疗:(1)透明胶囊中的 HMB-FA;(2)明胶胶囊中的 HMB-Ca;(3)溶于水的 HMB-Ca。所有治疗均提供 1 克 HMB。在摄入前和摄入后的多个时间点采集血液样本。计算了以下参数:血浆峰值(Cmax)、达到峰值的时间(Tmax)、HMB在血液中的斜率、曲线下面积(AUC)、半衰期(t1/2)和相对生物利用度(以水中的HMB-Ca为参照物)。所有治疗方法都会导致血浆中的 HMB 迅速大幅增加。胶囊中的 HMB-Ca 和水中的 HMB-Ca 在不同时间显示出相似的血浆 HMB 值(p = 0.438)。与其他处理相比,HMB-FA 的浓度较低(均为 p -1 × 720 分钟),Cmax(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:与 HMB-Ca 相比,HMB-FA 的 Cmax(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:229.2 ± 65.9;水中的 HMB-Ca:249.7 ± 49.7;HMB-FA:139.1 ± 67.2 µmol L-1)和相对生物利用度(胶囊中的 HMB-Ca:104.8 ± 14.9%;HMB-FA:61.5 ± 17.0%)更低(各处理间的 p 1/2 相似)。总之,与HMB-FA相比,HMB-Ca的生物利用度更高,水中的HMB-Ca吸收更快。各种形式的消除动力学相似,表明 HMB 的药物形式会影响吸收率,但不会影响其分布或消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Superior bioavailability of the calcium salt form of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate compared with the free acid form.

We investigated the bioavailability of the calcium salt (HMB-Ca) and the free acid (HMB-FA) forms of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB). Sixteen young individuals received the following treatments on three different occasions in a counterbalanced crossover fashion: (1) HMB-FA in clear capsules; (2) HMB-Ca in gelatine capsules; (3) HMB-Ca dissolved in water. All treatments provided 1 g of HMB. Blood samples were taken before and on multiple time points following ingestion. The following parameters were calculated: peak plasma (Cmax), time to peak (Tmax), slope of HMB appearance in blood, area under the curve (AUC), half-life time (t1/2) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in water set as reference). All treatments led to rapid and large increases in plasma HMB. HMB-Ca in capsules and in water showed similar plasma HMB values across time (p = 0.438). HMB-FA resulted in lower concentrations vs. the other treatments (both p < 0.001). AUC (HMB-Ca in capsules: 50,078 ± 10,507; HMB-Ca in water: 47,871 ± 10,783; HMB-FA: 29,130 ± 12,946 µmol L-1 × 720 min), Cmax (HMB-Ca in capsules: 229.2 ± 65.9; HMB-Ca in water: 249.7 ± 49.7; HMB-FA: 139.1 ± 67.2 µmol L-1) and relative bioavailability (HMB-Ca in capsules: 104.8 ± 14.9%; HMB-FA: 61.5 ± 17.0%) were lower in HMB-FA vs. HMB-Ca (all p < 0.001). HMB-Ca in water resulted in the fastest Tmax (43 ± 22 min) compared to HMB-Ca in capsules (79 ± 40 min) and HMB-FA (78 ± 21 min) (all p < 0.05), while t1/2 was similar between treatments. To conclude, HMB-Ca exhibited superior bioavailability compared to HMB-FA, with HMB-Ca in water showing faster absorption. Elimination kinetics were similar across all forms, suggesting that the pharmaceutical form of HMB affects the absorption rates, but not its distribution or elimination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Amino Acids
Amino Acids 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Amino Acids publishes contributions from all fields of amino acid and protein research: analysis, separation, synthesis, biosynthesis, cross linking amino acids, racemization/enantiomers, modification of amino acids as phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, glycosylation and nonenzymatic glycosylation, new roles for amino acids in physiology and pathophysiology, biology, amino acid analogues and derivatives, polyamines, radiated amino acids, peptides, stable isotopes and isotopes of amino acids. Applications in medicine, food chemistry, nutrition, gastroenterology, nephrology, neurochemistry, pharmacology, excitatory amino acids are just some of the topics covered. Fields of interest include: Biochemistry, food chemistry, nutrition, neurology, psychiatry, pharmacology, nephrology, gastroenterology, microbiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信