Serpil Çokakoğlu, Ruhi Nalçacı, Subutay Han Altıntaş, Fatih Atıcı
{"title":"自酸蚀底漆能否有效地将矫治器附件粘结到不同类型的陶瓷上?","authors":"Serpil Çokakoğlu, Ruhi Nalçacı, Subutay Han Altıntaş, Fatih Atıcı","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pretreatment with a self-etching primer for bonding aligner attachments to lithium disilicate (LD) and monolithic zirconia (MZ) ceramics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty ceramics, including LD (n=20) and MZ (n=20), were divided into four study groups according to the surface pretreatments: LD specimens pretreated with universal primer (Monobond Plus, MP) after hydrofluoric acid etching (Group 1); MZ ceramics pretreated with MP after sandblasting (Group 2); LD ceramics pretreated with self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond etch & prime, MEP) (Group 3); and MZ ceramics pretreated with MEP after sandblasting (Group 4). The aligner composite (GC Aligner Connect) and universal adhesive (GPremio Bond) were used to prepare the resin attachments. The bond strength was evaluated by micro-shear bond strength (SBS) testing (0.1 mm/min) after thermocycling, and the remnant adhesive was scored according to the resin attachment remnant index (RARI). The SBS data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests, and the RARI scores were analyzed using the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 had the lowest SBS, and group 2 had the highest SBS. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of bond strength (p<0.05). The RARI scores showed no significant differences, regardless of the pretreatment and ceramic type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a self-etching primer increased the bond strength of resin attachments on LD ceramics. For zirconia ceramics, both ceramic primers are recommended for aligner attachment bonding.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"37 1","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can a Self-etching Primer be Effective in Bonding Aligner Attachments to Different Types of Ceramics?\",\"authors\":\"Serpil Çokakoğlu, Ruhi Nalçacı, Subutay Han Altıntaş, Fatih Atıcı\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pretreatment with a self-etching primer for bonding aligner attachments to lithium disilicate (LD) and monolithic zirconia (MZ) ceramics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty ceramics, including LD (n=20) and MZ (n=20), were divided into four study groups according to the surface pretreatments: LD specimens pretreated with universal primer (Monobond Plus, MP) after hydrofluoric acid etching (Group 1); MZ ceramics pretreated with MP after sandblasting (Group 2); LD ceramics pretreated with self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond etch & prime, MEP) (Group 3); and MZ ceramics pretreated with MEP after sandblasting (Group 4). The aligner composite (GC Aligner Connect) and universal adhesive (GPremio Bond) were used to prepare the resin attachments. The bond strength was evaluated by micro-shear bond strength (SBS) testing (0.1 mm/min) after thermocycling, and the remnant adhesive was scored according to the resin attachment remnant index (RARI). The SBS data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests, and the RARI scores were analyzed using the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 had the lowest SBS, and group 2 had the highest SBS. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of bond strength (p<0.05). The RARI scores showed no significant differences, regardless of the pretreatment and ceramic type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a self-etching primer increased the bond strength of resin attachments on LD ceramics. For zirconia ceramics, both ceramic primers are recommended for aligner attachment bonding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"30-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本体外研究旨在评估自酸蚀底漆预处理对二硅酸锂(LD)和整体氧化锆(MZ)陶瓷粘接对准器附件的有效性:根据表面预处理情况,将包括LD(n=20)和MZ(n=20)在内的40种陶瓷分为四组进行研究:LD试样在氢氟酸腐蚀后用通用底漆(Monobond Plus,MP)进行预处理(第1组);MZ陶瓷在喷砂后用MP进行预处理(第2组);LD陶瓷在自腐蚀陶瓷底漆(Monobond etch & prime,MEP)进行预处理(第3组);MZ陶瓷在喷砂后用MEP进行预处理(第4组)。对准器复合材料(GC Aligner Connect)和通用粘合剂(GPremio Bond)用于制备树脂附着体。热循环后通过微剪切粘接强度(SBS)测试(0.1 毫米/分钟)评估粘接强度,并根据树脂附着残余指数(RARI)对残余粘接剂进行评分。SBS 数据采用方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行分析,RARI 分数采用卡方检验进行分析:结果:第 1 组的 SBS 最低,第 2 组的 SBS 最高。结果:第 1 组的 SBS 最低,第 2 组的 SBS 最高,各组在粘接强度方面有明显差异(p 结论:使用自酸蚀底漆可以提高粘接强度:使用自酸蚀底漆可提高 LD 陶瓷上树脂附着体的粘接强度。对于氧化锆陶瓷,建议使用两种陶瓷底漆进行对准器附着体的粘接。
Can a Self-etching Primer be Effective in Bonding Aligner Attachments to Different Types of Ceramics?
Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pretreatment with a self-etching primer for bonding aligner attachments to lithium disilicate (LD) and monolithic zirconia (MZ) ceramics.
Methods: Forty ceramics, including LD (n=20) and MZ (n=20), were divided into four study groups according to the surface pretreatments: LD specimens pretreated with universal primer (Monobond Plus, MP) after hydrofluoric acid etching (Group 1); MZ ceramics pretreated with MP after sandblasting (Group 2); LD ceramics pretreated with self-etching ceramic primer (Monobond etch & prime, MEP) (Group 3); and MZ ceramics pretreated with MEP after sandblasting (Group 4). The aligner composite (GC Aligner Connect) and universal adhesive (GPremio Bond) were used to prepare the resin attachments. The bond strength was evaluated by micro-shear bond strength (SBS) testing (0.1 mm/min) after thermocycling, and the remnant adhesive was scored according to the resin attachment remnant index (RARI). The SBS data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey tests, and the RARI scores were analyzed using the chi-square test.
Results: Group 1 had the lowest SBS, and group 2 had the highest SBS. There were significant differences between the groups in terms of bond strength (p<0.05). The RARI scores showed no significant differences, regardless of the pretreatment and ceramic type.
Conclusion: The use of a self-etching primer increased the bond strength of resin attachments on LD ceramics. For zirconia ceramics, both ceramic primers are recommended for aligner attachment bonding.