从棉花马瑟到福奇博士：疫苗犹豫不决的历史标志。

Q2 Medicine

NeoReviews Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1542/neo.25-3-e187

Destri Eichman, Dana Bichianu

{"title":"从棉花马瑟到福奇博士：疫苗犹豫不决的历史标志。","authors":"Destri Eichman, Dana Bichianu","doi":"10.1542/neo.25-3-e187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine hesitancy became an important topic in the public discourse and academic research during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its history is as long as the history of immunization. One can find the same determinants of vaccine hesitancy, though in variable proportions, since the 1721 Boston smallpox epidemic. We aim to describe several historical immunization moments and analyze them using the vaccine hesitancy framework of the \"5Cs\" (ie, confidence, complacency, constraints, risk calculation, and collective responsibility).","PeriodicalId":19465,"journal":{"name":"NeoReviews","volume":"25 4","pages":"e187-e192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Cotton Mather to Dr Fauci: Historical Markers of Vaccine Hesitancy.\",\"authors\":\"Destri Eichman, Dana Bichianu\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/neo.25-3-e187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vaccine hesitancy became an important topic in the public discourse and academic research during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its history is as long as the history of immunization. One can find the same determinants of vaccine hesitancy, though in variable proportions, since the 1721 Boston smallpox epidemic. We aim to describe several historical immunization moments and analyze them using the vaccine hesitancy framework of the \\\"5Cs\\\" (ie, confidence, complacency, constraints, risk calculation, and collective responsibility).\",\"PeriodicalId\":19465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeoReviews\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"e187-e192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeoReviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.25-3-e187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeoReviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.25-3-e187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间，疫苗犹豫成为公众讨论和学术研究中的一个重要话题，但其历史与免疫接种的历史一样悠久。自 1721 年波士顿天花疫情以来，我们就可以发现疫苗犹豫不决的相同决定因素，尽管比例各不相同。我们旨在描述几个历史上的免疫时刻，并使用 "5C"（即自信、自满、约束、风险计算和集体责任）的疫苗犹豫框架对其进行分析。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From Cotton Mather to Dr Fauci: Historical Markers of Vaccine Hesitancy.

Vaccine hesitancy became an important topic in the public discourse and academic research during the COVID-19 pandemic, but its history is as long as the history of immunization. One can find the same determinants of vaccine hesitancy, though in variable proportions, since the 1721 Boston smallpox epidemic. We aim to describe several historical immunization moments and analyze them using the vaccine hesitancy framework of the "5Cs" (ie, confidence, complacency, constraints, risk calculation, and collective responsibility).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

NeoReviews Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

110

期刊介绍： Co-edited by Alistair G.S. Philip, MD, FAAP, and William W. Hay Jr., MD, FAAP, NeoReviews each month delivers 3 to 4 clinical reviews, case discussions, basic science insights and "on the horizon" pieces. Written and edited by experts, these concise reviews are available to NeoReviews subscribers at http://neoreviews.aappublications.org. Since January 2009, all clinical articles have been mapped to the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) content specifications in neonatology.