针对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的体育和社交活动干预 "快乐呼吸 "的可接受性、实用性、实施和有效性:可行性研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
A Lewis, L A Turner, S Fryer, R Smith, H Dillarstone, Y W Patrick, E Bevan-Smith
{"title":"针对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的体育和社交活动干预 \"快乐呼吸 \"的可接受性、实用性、实施和有效性:可行性研究。","authors":"A Lewis, L A Turner, S Fryer, R Smith, H Dillarstone, Y W Patrick, E Bevan-Smith","doi":"10.1177/14799731241238435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a group-based pilot programme of low-to-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities, by investigating acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy testing. We offer suggestions on programme adaptions for future study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with a range of chronic respiratory diseases were invited to participate in a pilot 12 week group activity programme. Activities included outdoor walking, tai-chi, education and a range of social activities. Acceptability was determined by participant experiences determined during interviews. Practicality was determined by programme and outcome measure completion, cost and adverse events. Implementation was determined according to whether the programme ran as planned. Efficacy was determined by statistical analyses of outcomes including hand grip strength, timed up and go test, COPD Helplessness Index, COPD Assessment Test, and measures of physical activity via accelerometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis indicated that the \"BreatheHappy\" programme was acceptable. Seven of nine participants completed eight out of 10 sessions and the majority completed all outcome measures. \"BreatheHappy\" was therefore considered practical. The programme was not implemented as planned, with only 10 sessions running rather than the 12 intended. There was a significant increase in daily step counts (MD: 1284 95% CI: 240-2329 <i>p</i>: 0.024 effect size: 0.988), stepping time (MD: 16 min 95% CI: 5-27 min <i>p</i>: 0.011 effect size: 1.36) and daily minutes completing light physical activity (MD: 23 95% CI: 6-38 <i>p</i>: 0.006 effect size: 1.6). However, time spent sitting for ≥30 min but ≤60 min significantly increased (MD: 26 95% CI: 0.2-52 min <i>p</i>: 0.049 effect size: 0.931), showing signs of efficacy and changing physical activity behaviour patterns.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A 10-week programme of low-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities shows signs of feasibility for future research. Suggested adaptions for future study include using physical activity measures such as daily step count or light physical activity for a primary outcome, and mental health and social health related outcome measures relatable to participant's beneficial experiences of the programme. Recruitment in future studies will try and reach both those less socially active and possibly those who have completed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Venues should be close to efficient transport links whilst different frequencies and durations of programme delivery should be trialled. Adequate funding should be provided for both staff running the programme and blinded research staff for outcome measurement.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy of a physical and social activity intervention 'BreatheHappy' for people with long-term respiratory conditions: A feasibility study.\",\"authors\":\"A Lewis, L A Turner, S Fryer, R Smith, H Dillarstone, Y W Patrick, E Bevan-Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731241238435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a group-based pilot programme of low-to-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities, by investigating acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy testing. We offer suggestions on programme adaptions for future study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with a range of chronic respiratory diseases were invited to participate in a pilot 12 week group activity programme. Activities included outdoor walking, tai-chi, education and a range of social activities. Acceptability was determined by participant experiences determined during interviews. Practicality was determined by programme and outcome measure completion, cost and adverse events. Implementation was determined according to whether the programme ran as planned. Efficacy was determined by statistical analyses of outcomes including hand grip strength, timed up and go test, COPD Helplessness Index, COPD Assessment Test, and measures of physical activity via accelerometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis indicated that the \\\"BreatheHappy\\\" programme was acceptable. Seven of nine participants completed eight out of 10 sessions and the majority completed all outcome measures. \\\"BreatheHappy\\\" was therefore considered practical. The programme was not implemented as planned, with only 10 sessions running rather than the 12 intended. There was a significant increase in daily step counts (MD: 1284 95% CI: 240-2329 <i>p</i>: 0.024 effect size: 0.988), stepping time (MD: 16 min 95% CI: 5-27 min <i>p</i>: 0.011 effect size: 1.36) and daily minutes completing light physical activity (MD: 23 95% CI: 6-38 <i>p</i>: 0.006 effect size: 1.6). However, time spent sitting for ≥30 min but ≤60 min significantly increased (MD: 26 95% CI: 0.2-52 min <i>p</i>: 0.049 effect size: 0.931), showing signs of efficacy and changing physical activity behaviour patterns.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A 10-week programme of low-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities shows signs of feasibility for future research. Suggested adaptions for future study include using physical activity measures such as daily step count or light physical activity for a primary outcome, and mental health and social health related outcome measures relatable to participant's beneficial experiences of the programme. Recruitment in future studies will try and reach both those less socially active and possibly those who have completed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Venues should be close to efficient transport links whilst different frequencies and durations of programme delivery should be trialled. Adequate funding should be provided for both staff running the programme and blinded research staff for outcome measurement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981237/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241238435\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241238435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在通过调查可接受性、实用性、实施情况和效果测试,确定以小组为基础的中低强度体力活动训练、教育和社交活动试点计划的可行性。我们为今后的研究提供了计划调整建议:方法:邀请患有各种慢性呼吸系统疾病的人参加为期 12 周的试点团体活动计划。活动包括户外步行、太极拳、教育和一系列社交活动。可接受性由参与者在访谈中的体验决定。实用性则根据计划和结果测量的完成情况、成本和不良事件来确定。执行情况根据计划是否按计划进行来确定。通过对结果进行统计分析,包括手部握力、定时起立测试、慢性阻塞性肺病无助感指数、慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试,以及通过加速度计进行的体力活动测量,来确定计划的有效性:专题分析表明,"快乐呼吸 "计划是可以接受的。9 名参与者中有 7 人完成了 10 个疗程中的 8 个疗程,大多数人完成了所有结果测量。因此,"快乐呼吸 "被认为是切实可行的。该计划没有按计划实施,只进行了 10 次,而不是原定的 12 次。每天的步数(MD:1284 95% CI:240-2329 p:0.024 效果大小:0.988)、踏步时间(MD:16 min 95% CI:5-27 min p:0.011 效果大小:1.36)和每天完成轻体力活动的分钟数(MD:23 95% CI:6-38 p:0.006 效果大小:1.6)均有明显增加。然而,久坐时间≥30 分钟但≤60 分钟的人明显增加(MD:26 95% CI:0.2-52 分钟 p:0.049 效应量:0.931),显示出疗效和改变体育活动行为模式的迹象:讨论:为期 10 周的中低强度体育锻炼培训、教育和社交活动计划显示了未来研究的可行性。建议对未来研究进行调整,包括使用体力活动测量方法(如每日步数或轻度体力活动)作为主要结果,以及使用与参与者在该计划中的有益体验相关的心理健康和社会健康相关结果测量方法。在未来的研究中,将尝试同时招募社会活动较少的人和可能已经完成肺康复(PR)的人。活动地点应靠近交通便利的地方,同时应尝试不同的活动频率和持续时间。应为实施计划的工作人员和进行结果测量的盲人研究人员提供充足的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy of a physical and social activity intervention 'BreatheHappy' for people with long-term respiratory conditions: A feasibility study.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a group-based pilot programme of low-to-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities, by investigating acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy testing. We offer suggestions on programme adaptions for future study.

Methods: People with a range of chronic respiratory diseases were invited to participate in a pilot 12 week group activity programme. Activities included outdoor walking, tai-chi, education and a range of social activities. Acceptability was determined by participant experiences determined during interviews. Practicality was determined by programme and outcome measure completion, cost and adverse events. Implementation was determined according to whether the programme ran as planned. Efficacy was determined by statistical analyses of outcomes including hand grip strength, timed up and go test, COPD Helplessness Index, COPD Assessment Test, and measures of physical activity via accelerometry.

Results: Thematic analysis indicated that the "BreatheHappy" programme was acceptable. Seven of nine participants completed eight out of 10 sessions and the majority completed all outcome measures. "BreatheHappy" was therefore considered practical. The programme was not implemented as planned, with only 10 sessions running rather than the 12 intended. There was a significant increase in daily step counts (MD: 1284 95% CI: 240-2329 p: 0.024 effect size: 0.988), stepping time (MD: 16 min 95% CI: 5-27 min p: 0.011 effect size: 1.36) and daily minutes completing light physical activity (MD: 23 95% CI: 6-38 p: 0.006 effect size: 1.6). However, time spent sitting for ≥30 min but ≤60 min significantly increased (MD: 26 95% CI: 0.2-52 min p: 0.049 effect size: 0.931), showing signs of efficacy and changing physical activity behaviour patterns.

Discussion: A 10-week programme of low-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities shows signs of feasibility for future research. Suggested adaptions for future study include using physical activity measures such as daily step count or light physical activity for a primary outcome, and mental health and social health related outcome measures relatable to participant's beneficial experiences of the programme. Recruitment in future studies will try and reach both those less socially active and possibly those who have completed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Venues should be close to efficient transport links whilst different frequencies and durations of programme delivery should be trialled. Adequate funding should be provided for both staff running the programme and blinded research staff for outcome measurement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信