秘鲁教师数字能力问卷的分析和有效性证据

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Henry Santa-Cruz-Espinoza;Nancy Barazorda Puga;Jorge Antonio Crisostomo Olivares;Jeannina Del Alva Huaman Carhuatocto;Luis Enrique Arenas Rebaza;Gina Chávez-Ventura
{"title":"秘鲁教师数字能力问卷的分析和有效性证据","authors":"Henry Santa-Cruz-Espinoza;Nancy Barazorda Puga;Jorge Antonio Crisostomo Olivares;Jeannina Del Alva Huaman Carhuatocto;Luis Enrique Arenas Rebaza;Gina Chávez-Ventura","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2024.3368328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-experimental instrumental study whose objective was to analyze digital competences in a sample of Peruvian teachers and to show evidence of validity of the self-report questionnaire used. The Digital Competence Questionnaire was administered to a non-probabilistic sample of 414 participants. The results confirmed the multidimensional structure with five correlated factors and the reliability of the instrument. The comparative analysis indicated that basic education teachers have the lowest digital competence. Post-hoc comparisons showed that teachers with higher academic degree and younger age presented higher digital competence in relation to their comparison group. The results suggest differences in teachers’ digital competence according to some personal aspects.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis and Validity Evidence of the Digital Competence Questionnaire for Peruvian Teachers\",\"authors\":\"Henry Santa-Cruz-Espinoza;Nancy Barazorda Puga;Jorge Antonio Crisostomo Olivares;Jeannina Del Alva Huaman Carhuatocto;Luis Enrique Arenas Rebaza;Gina Chávez-Ventura\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RITA.2024.3368328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-experimental instrumental study whose objective was to analyze digital competences in a sample of Peruvian teachers and to show evidence of validity of the self-report questionnaire used. The Digital Competence Questionnaire was administered to a non-probabilistic sample of 414 participants. The results confirmed the multidimensional structure with five correlated factors and the reliability of the instrument. The comparative analysis indicated that basic education teachers have the lowest digital competence. Post-hoc comparisons showed that teachers with higher academic degree and younger age presented higher digital competence in relation to their comparison group. The results suggest differences in teachers’ digital competence according to some personal aspects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10440598/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10440598/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非实验性工具研究,旨在分析秘鲁教师样本的数字能力,并证明所使用的自我报告问卷的有效性。对 414 名参与者进行了非概率抽样数字能力问卷调查。调查结果表明,该问卷具有多维结构,包含五个相关因素,并且具有可靠性。比较分析表明,基础教育教师的数字化能力最低。事后比较显示,学历越高、年龄越小的教师的数字化能力越高。结果表明,教师的数字化能力因个人的某些方面而存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis and Validity Evidence of the Digital Competence Questionnaire for Peruvian Teachers
Non-experimental instrumental study whose objective was to analyze digital competences in a sample of Peruvian teachers and to show evidence of validity of the self-report questionnaire used. The Digital Competence Questionnaire was administered to a non-probabilistic sample of 414 participants. The results confirmed the multidimensional structure with five correlated factors and the reliability of the instrument. The comparative analysis indicated that basic education teachers have the lowest digital competence. Post-hoc comparisons showed that teachers with higher academic degree and younger age presented higher digital competence in relation to their comparison group. The results suggest differences in teachers’ digital competence according to some personal aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信