认知能力对实践性军事工作熟练程度的元分析有效性

IF 3.3 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101818

Jeffrey M. Cucina , Scott K. Burtnick , Maria E. De la Flor Musso , Philip T. Walmsley , Kimberly J. Wilson

{"title":"认知能力对实践性军事工作熟练程度的元分析有效性","authors":"Jeffrey M. Cucina , Scott K. Burtnick , Maria E. De la Flor Musso , Philip T. Walmsley , Kimberly J. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of U.S. military enlistment cognitive ability tests was conducted using hands-on performance tests (HOPTs) as the criterion. In a HOPT, incumbents perform a representative sample of the tasks for a position and are evaluated by trained raters. We found operational validities in the .40s to .50s. Our meta-analytic database allowed us to investigate concerns regarding overcorrections (via use of multivariate corrections with credible applicant covariances) and provides a direct measure of job proficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 101818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analytic validity of cognitive ability for hands-on military job proficiency\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey M. Cucina , Scott K. Burtnick , Maria E. De la Flor Musso , Philip T. Walmsley , Kimberly J. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of U.S. military enlistment cognitive ability tests was conducted using hands-on performance tests (HOPTs) as the criterion. In a HOPT, incumbents perform a representative sample of the tasks for a position and are evaluated by trained raters. We found operational validities in the .40s to .50s. Our meta-analytic database allowed us to investigate concerns regarding overcorrections (via use of multivariate corrections with credible applicant covariances) and provides a direct measure of job proficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101818\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000126\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289624000126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

以实际操作能力测试（HOPT）为标准，对美国军队征兵认知能力测试的标准相关效度进行了荟萃分析。在 HOPT 中，应征者要完成一个职位的代表性任务样本，并由训练有素的评分者进行评估。我们发现操作有效性在 0.40 到 0.50 之间。我们的元分析数据库使我们能够调查有关过度校正的问题（通过使用可信的申请人协方差进行多元校正），并提供了工作熟练程度的直接测量方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Meta-analytic validity of cognitive ability for hands-on military job proficiency

A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of U.S. military enlistment cognitive ability tests was conducted using hands-on performance tests (HOPTs) as the criterion. In a HOPT, incumbents perform a representative sample of the tasks for a position and are evaluated by trained raters. We found operational validities in the .40s to .50s. Our meta-analytic database allowed us to investigate concerns regarding overcorrections (via use of multivariate corrections with credible applicant covariances) and provides a direct measure of job proficiency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

5.80

自引率

13.30%

发文量

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.