[门诊医疗保健中的跨专业合作形式。瑞士德语区的交叉案例分析]。

Q4 Medicine
Praxis Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Bettina Schwind, Sonja Merten, Eva Hollenstein, Kaspar Wyss, Jana Gerold
{"title":"[门诊医疗保健中的跨专业合作形式。瑞士德语区的交叉案例分析]。","authors":"Bettina Schwind, Sonja Merten, Eva Hollenstein, Kaspar Wyss, Jana Gerold","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The quality of care for the chronically ill is to be improved through interprofessional cooperation (IPC). To date, evaluation projects on IPC have mostly focused on the inpatient sector. The aim was to use a multiple case study design to investigate forms of IPC in primary care and to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors. Factors that facilitated the implementation of IPC included having a responsible person employed to provide the service, supportive training, and the introduction of evidence-based interventions. There appeared to be insufficient incentives to implement IPC and the needs of the chronically ill were poorly integrated. More systematic evaluation of IPC initiatives is needed to demonstrate their added value. Greater integration of patient needs is key.</p>","PeriodicalId":20494,"journal":{"name":"Praxis","volume":"113 2","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Forms of Interprofessional Cooperation in Outpatient Health Care. A Cross-Case Analysis in German-Speaking Switzerland].\",\"authors\":\"Bettina Schwind, Sonja Merten, Eva Hollenstein, Kaspar Wyss, Jana Gerold\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The quality of care for the chronically ill is to be improved through interprofessional cooperation (IPC). To date, evaluation projects on IPC have mostly focused on the inpatient sector. The aim was to use a multiple case study design to investigate forms of IPC in primary care and to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors. Factors that facilitated the implementation of IPC included having a responsible person employed to provide the service, supportive training, and the introduction of evidence-based interventions. There appeared to be insufficient incentives to implement IPC and the needs of the chronically ill were poorly integrated. More systematic evaluation of IPC initiatives is needed to demonstrate their added value. Greater integration of patient needs is key.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Praxis\",\"volume\":\"113 2\",\"pages\":\"28-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:通过跨专业合作(IPC)可以提高慢性病患者的护理质量。迄今为止,有关 IPC 的评估项目大多集中在住院部门。我们的目的是采用多案例研究设计,调查基础医疗中的 IPC 形式,并找出促进和抑制因素。促进实施 IPC 的因素包括:聘用负责人提供服务、支持性培训以及引入循证干预措施。实施 IPC 的激励措施似乎不足,慢性病患者的需求也没有得到很好的整合。需要对 IPC 举措进行更系统的评估,以证明其附加值。进一步整合病人的需求是关键所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Forms of Interprofessional Cooperation in Outpatient Health Care. A Cross-Case Analysis in German-Speaking Switzerland].

Introduction: The quality of care for the chronically ill is to be improved through interprofessional cooperation (IPC). To date, evaluation projects on IPC have mostly focused on the inpatient sector. The aim was to use a multiple case study design to investigate forms of IPC in primary care and to identify facilitating and inhibiting factors. Factors that facilitated the implementation of IPC included having a responsible person employed to provide the service, supportive training, and the introduction of evidence-based interventions. There appeared to be insufficient incentives to implement IPC and the needs of the chronically ill were poorly integrated. More systematic evaluation of IPC initiatives is needed to demonstrate their added value. Greater integration of patient needs is key.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Praxis
Praxis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信