基于研究人员合作和相似性测量技术计算研究学科间距离的新方法

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Bram Vancraeynest , Hoang-Son Pham , Amr Ali-Eldin
{"title":"基于研究人员合作和相似性测量技术计算研究学科间距离的新方法","authors":"Bram Vancraeynest ,&nbsp;Hoang-Son Pham ,&nbsp;Amr Ali-Eldin","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The measurement of distance between research disciplines involves various approaches, with a focus on publication citation analysis. However, calculating discipline distance requires more than just selecting relevant information; it also involves choosing suitable quantification methods and similarity measures. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to measuring the distance between research disciplines, referred to as a distance matrix. This approach is particularly useful when there is limited availability of citation data, providing an alternative method for quantifying the distance between disciplines. Our method counts co-occurrences of disciplines based on researcher collaborations in projects and evaluates various similarity measures to convert the co-occurrence matrix into a similarity matrix. We analyze the behavior of different similarity measures and propose functions to transform the similarity matrix into a distance matrix, capturing research discipline dissimilarity effectively. Additionally, we establish evaluation criteria for distance matrix quality. We implement our approach on the Flanders Research Information Space dataset, showing promising results. The distance matrix demonstrates satisfactory density scores, outperforming traditional approaches in skewness and deviation. The probability density functions of distances remain consistent over time, indicating stability. Furthermore, the distance matrix proves valuable for visualizing discipline profiles associated with the dataset, providing valuable insights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach to computing the distances between research disciplines based on researcher collaborations and similarity measurement techniques\",\"authors\":\"Bram Vancraeynest ,&nbsp;Hoang-Son Pham ,&nbsp;Amr Ali-Eldin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The measurement of distance between research disciplines involves various approaches, with a focus on publication citation analysis. However, calculating discipline distance requires more than just selecting relevant information; it also involves choosing suitable quantification methods and similarity measures. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to measuring the distance between research disciplines, referred to as a distance matrix. This approach is particularly useful when there is limited availability of citation data, providing an alternative method for quantifying the distance between disciplines. Our method counts co-occurrences of disciplines based on researcher collaborations in projects and evaluates various similarity measures to convert the co-occurrence matrix into a similarity matrix. We analyze the behavior of different similarity measures and propose functions to transform the similarity matrix into a distance matrix, capturing research discipline dissimilarity effectively. Additionally, we establish evaluation criteria for distance matrix quality. We implement our approach on the Flanders Research Information Space dataset, showing promising results. The distance matrix demonstrates satisfactory density scores, outperforming traditional approaches in skewness and deviation. The probability density functions of distances remain consistent over time, indicating stability. Furthermore, the distance matrix proves valuable for visualizing discipline profiles associated with the dataset, providing valuable insights.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000403\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724000403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量研究学科间的距离涉及多种方法,重点是出版物引文分析。然而,计算学科距离不仅需要选择相关信息,还需要选择合适的量化方法和相似性度量。在本文中,我们介绍了一种测量研究学科间距离的新方法,即距离矩阵。这种方法在引用数据有限的情况下尤为有用,为量化学科间的距离提供了另一种方法。我们的方法根据研究人员在项目中的合作情况统计学科的共现情况,并评估各种相似性度量,从而将共现矩阵转换为相似性矩阵。我们分析了不同相似性度量的行为,并提出了将相似性矩阵转换为距离矩阵的函数,从而有效捕捉研究学科的不相似性。此外,我们还建立了距离矩阵质量的评估标准。我们在弗兰德斯研究信息空间数据集上实施了我们的方法,结果令人鼓舞。距离矩阵显示出令人满意的密度得分,在偏度和偏差方面优于传统方法。随着时间的推移,距离的概率密度函数保持一致,显示出稳定性。此外,距离矩阵还能直观地显示与数据集相关的学科概况,提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new approach to computing the distances between research disciplines based on researcher collaborations and similarity measurement techniques

The measurement of distance between research disciplines involves various approaches, with a focus on publication citation analysis. However, calculating discipline distance requires more than just selecting relevant information; it also involves choosing suitable quantification methods and similarity measures. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to measuring the distance between research disciplines, referred to as a distance matrix. This approach is particularly useful when there is limited availability of citation data, providing an alternative method for quantifying the distance between disciplines. Our method counts co-occurrences of disciplines based on researcher collaborations in projects and evaluates various similarity measures to convert the co-occurrence matrix into a similarity matrix. We analyze the behavior of different similarity measures and propose functions to transform the similarity matrix into a distance matrix, capturing research discipline dissimilarity effectively. Additionally, we establish evaluation criteria for distance matrix quality. We implement our approach on the Flanders Research Information Space dataset, showing promising results. The distance matrix demonstrates satisfactory density scores, outperforming traditional approaches in skewness and deviation. The probability density functions of distances remain consistent over time, indicating stability. Furthermore, the distance matrix proves valuable for visualizing discipline profiles associated with the dataset, providing valuable insights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信